• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Worlds first 6TB HDD, with helium!

Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
1,690 (1.16/day)
Likes
1,094
System Name AMD Black Widow
Processor AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-780T-D3L (rev. 4.0)
Cooling Cooler master hyper 212 EVO
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 2x4GB 1600MHz KHX1600C9D3B1K2/8GX
Video Card(s) MSI Radeon HD 7850 2GB OC GDDR5 Twin Frozr 3
Storage WESTERN DIGITAL 1TB 64MB 7k SATA600 Blue WD10EZEX
Display(s) LG W2453SQ-PF
Case Thermaltake Chaser A31 Black
Power Supply Cooler Master Extreme Power plus 460w
Software Windows 7 64bit
#2
Yeah seen it before. It's nice that they are making improvement's in disk capacity. But looking at statistics bigger drives fail faster.
 

BUCK NASTY

F@H Mod & 4P Enthusiust
Staff member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
4,973 (1.30/day)
Likes
4,639
Location
Port St Lucie, FL. U.S.A.
System Name Main Rig
Processor AMD FX-4130 @ 4.8Ghz
Motherboard ASUS M5A99X Evo
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212+
Memory 8GB GSkill DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 Strix @ 1503Mhz Core
Storage Corsair Force 90gb SSD/ WD Caviar Blue 750gb
Display(s) ASUS 24" IPS
Case Coolermaster Centurion 590
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec TP750 80+
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64
#3
I'd hate to see my complete HD movie library wiped out by a single drive. I'm pushing my luck with the 3TB drive i just installed in the HTPC. LOL
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,098 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,222
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#5
The read/write speed on it is pretty disappointing to me. That drive would take half a day to format.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
954 (0.59/day)
Likes
385
Location
Cumberland Plateau
System Name EVGA-FX | Lenny (Lenovo Y480)
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.5GHz 1.416v | i7 3610qm
Motherboard Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600 | 8gb DDR3 @ 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX780 Classified @ 1228MHz 1.615v | GT640m LE
Storage Crucial M500 480GB, WD Caviar Blue 500GB, WD Scorpio Blue 750GB | Samsung 250GB 840
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 1440p | 42" Vizio 3D LCD TV 1080p
Case CoolerMaster HAF XB Evo
Power Supply Seasonic G-650
Software Windows 6.3.9600
#7
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
2,998 (0.61/day)
Likes
1,578
Location
Visalia, CA
System Name Crimson Titan 2.5
Processor Intel Core i7 5930K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard Asus ROG Rampage V Extreme
Cooling CPU: Swiftech H220-X, RAM: Geil Cyclone 2, VGA: Custom EK water loop
Memory 8x4GBs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 XMP2 3000MHz @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX Titan X SCs in SLI under full cover EK water blocks
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Acer XB280HK 28" 4K G-Sync - 2x27" Acer HN274s 1920x1080 120Hz
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T - EK Pump/Reservoir, 360mm EK Radiator
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro on Logitech THX Z-5500 5.1/Razer Tiamat 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Silvestone ST1500 1.5 kW
Mouse Cyborg R.A.T. 9
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
#8

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,098 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,222
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#9
What does formatting entail to you?
Checking for bad sectors. Format without checking for bad sectors is moot.

6,000,000 MB / 150 MB/s = 40,000 seconds = 666.67 minutes = 11.11 hours

DoD 5220.22M 3-pass erase + 40% verification is expected to take over a day and a half (~37 hours) to complete. That's ridiculously long.

3 TB drives take about 4-6 hours compared to 11.11 hours. What I'm getting at is that, even though these drives were able to double their capacity, they were not able to double (or increase at all) their read/write performance. If that is the trend with helium drives, helium drives are not a long term answer to the hard drive problem.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
954 (0.59/day)
Likes
385
Location
Cumberland Plateau
System Name EVGA-FX | Lenny (Lenovo Y480)
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.5GHz 1.416v | i7 3610qm
Motherboard Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600 | 8gb DDR3 @ 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX780 Classified @ 1228MHz 1.615v | GT640m LE
Storage Crucial M500 480GB, WD Caviar Blue 500GB, WD Scorpio Blue 750GB | Samsung 250GB 840
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 1440p | 42" Vizio 3D LCD TV 1080p
Case CoolerMaster HAF XB Evo
Power Supply Seasonic G-650
Software Windows 6.3.9600
#10
Checking for bad sectors. Format without checking for bad sectors is moot.

6,000,000 MB / 150 MB/s = 40,000 seconds = 666.67 minutes = 11.11 hours

DoD 5220.22M 3-pass erase + 40% verification is expected to take over a day and a half (~37 hours) to complete. That's ridiculously long.

3 TB drives take about 4-6 hours compared to 11.11 hours. What I'm getting at is that, even though these drives were able to double their capacity, they were not able to double (or increase at all) their read/write performance. If that is the trend with helium drives, helium drives are not a long term answer to the hard drive problem.
Valid point. Knock on wood that not checking for bad sectors on a new drive hasn't bitten me in the ass.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,484 (0.57/day)
Likes
544
System Name My Surround PC
Processor Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.2 GHz (1.15 V)
Motherboard ASRock Z87 Extreme6
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / XSPC Rasa CPU / Swiftech MCW82 / Koolance HX-1320 w/ 8 Scythe Fans
Memory 16GB (2 x 8 GB) Mushkin Blackline DDR3-2400 CL11-13-13-31
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti Armor 2X
Storage Samsung SSD 850 Pro 256GB, 2 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD in RAID 1
Display(s) 3 x Acer K272HUL 27" in Surround 7860x1440
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Integrated ALC1150 + Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1250 1.25kW
Mouse Gigabyte Aivia Krypton
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Windows 8.1 Pro x64
#11
Yeah seen it before. It's nice that they are making improvement's in disk capacity. But looking at statistics bigger drives fail faster.
He filled HDDs are nice, but in my view it's a dead-end technology. He-filled hard drives are a one-time doubling in capacity. I don't see how they can improve on the technology from here. The form factors are fixed so you can't increased the physical size of the drive, and if someone knew how to make thinner platters with the requisite rigidity (in order to increase the number of platters), it would not be exclusive to He-filled HDDs.

In contrast, the true advances in HDD technology are still platter density. If HAMR or patterned media actually ever comes to fruition then it will be good for improvements over many generations just as has occurred with PMR, which increased capacity by ~10x over many years.

3 TB drives take about 4-6 hours compared to 11.11 hours. What I'm getting at is that, even though these drives were able to double their capacity, they were not able to double (or increase at all) their read/write performance. If that is the trend with helium drives, helium drives are not a long term answer to the hard drive problem.
And therein lies the problem with He HDDs. Since HDDs only read from one platter at a time and all He HDDs do is increase the number of platters, transfer rate does not increase in a He HDD. Therefore the time to write the entire drive increases proportionately to the capacity increase.
 
Last edited:

theonedub

habe fidem
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,911 (2.48/day)
Likes
5,126
Location
Northern CA, USA
System Name Erakith || Asus UX305FA
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.2ghz 1.068v || Intel Core M 5Y10 @ 800mhz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP4 TH || ASUS OE
Cooling EK Supremacy, D5 w/ EK Top, 2X EK-CoolStream XTX 360 & Photon 270 Res || !PASSIVE!
Memory 16GB Samsung 'Wonder' RAM || 8GB LPDDR3 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA 780Ti Classified HydroCopper || Intel HD Graphics 5300
Storage 256gb Corsair Performance Pro, 2TB Caviar Green, 2TB Samsung F4 || Toshiba 256GB SSD
Display(s) DELL Ultrasharp U2715H 27" || 13.3" 1080P IPS
Case CaseLabs Merlin SM8 || Aluminum Unibody
Power Supply NZXT Hale-90-1000-M
Mouse Logitech M705 Marathon
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB w/ Cherry MX Silent
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 || WIndows 10 Home x64
Benchmark Scores WCG & F@H Only
#12

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,098 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,222
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#13
And therein lies the problem with He HDDs. Since HDDs only read from one platter at a time and all He HDDs do is increase the number of platters, transfer rate does not increase in a He HDD. Therefore the time to write the entire drive increases proportionately to the capacity increase.
Increased density + same RPM (and it is the same at 7200 RPM) should translate to increased read/write performance because the head is exposed to more data. This is why single platter 1 TB drives are so much faster than dual platter 1 TB drives. I'm beginning to get the impression that they didn't increase the density at all--instead, they used helium to add more platters. But no, they can't be right either because 3.5" drives only have room for 5 platters...unless helium enabled them to make the platters thinner so there's six 1 TB platters in there. That would explain the (poor) performance.

In any case, this is disappointing. I hope it is just a bug or fluke that will get corrected in mature models.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
1,713 (0.79/day)
Likes
602
System Name msdos
Processor 8088
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
#14
It just sounds like a ticking time bomb to me, it's gonna leak out with time.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,484 (0.57/day)
Likes
544
System Name My Surround PC
Processor Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.2 GHz (1.15 V)
Motherboard ASRock Z87 Extreme6
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / XSPC Rasa CPU / Swiftech MCW82 / Koolance HX-1320 w/ 8 Scythe Fans
Memory 16GB (2 x 8 GB) Mushkin Blackline DDR3-2400 CL11-13-13-31
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti Armor 2X
Storage Samsung SSD 850 Pro 256GB, 2 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD in RAID 1
Display(s) 3 x Acer K272HUL 27" in Surround 7860x1440
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Integrated ALC1150 + Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1250 1.25kW
Mouse Gigabyte Aivia Krypton
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Windows 8.1 Pro x64
#15
Increased density + same RPM (and it is the same at 7200 RPM) should translate to increased read/write performance because the head is exposed to more data. This is why single platter 1 TB drives are so much faster than dual platter 1 TB drives. I'm beginning to get the impression that they didn't increase the density at all--instead, they used helium to add more platters. But no, they can't be right either because 3.5" drives only have room for 5 platters...unless helium enabled them to make the platters thinner so there's six 1 TB platters in there. That would explain the (poor) performance.

In any case, this is disappointing. I hope it is just a bug or fluke that will get corrected in mature models.
I think you had unrealistic expectations, because the helium has nothing to do with advanced platter designs or increases in areal density. The only point of helium HDDs is that the helium allows a reduction the head fly height and thus the ability to cram up to 7 platters into the disk instead of the maximum 5 platters in a conventional air HDD. That's where 100% of the capacity increase comes from. There is nothing else new about them. That's why I see helium HDDs as less than a disruptive technology since it's a one time capacity increase. Air filled HDDs will always coexist with Helium HDDs; the Helium HDDs will just be the new top of the line. They will stay at about 50% more capacity than the top of the line air filled hard disk but no better performance compared to air filled HDDs since they will both be based on the same platter technology.

How did they come up with 3 days? I've been able to write the full capacity to my 128gb MicroSD in about 3 hours :confused:

You're right - I stated the wrong unit. 128000MB/14.6MB/s = 2.46 hours
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,531 (4.82/day)
Likes
5,618
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#16
Increased density + same RPM (and it is the same at 7200 RPM) should translate to increased read/write performance because the head is exposed to more data. This is why single platter 1 TB drives are so much faster than dual platter 1 TB drives. I'm beginning to get the impression that they didn't increase the density at all--instead, they used helium to add more platters. But no, they can't be right either because 3.5" drives only have room for 5 platters...unless helium enabled them to make the platters thinner so there's six 1 TB platters in there. That would explain the (poor) performance.

In any case, this is disappointing. I hope it is just a bug or fluke that will get corrected in mature models.
I think that it does. The helium is supposed to reduce air friction inside the drive which would make it easier for the motor to spin more platters and because of the helium there is less air turbulence than traditional drives. Personally, I would rather see higher density platters.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,098 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,222
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#17
In which case, I wonder what their pricing is going to be. Specifically, will two 3 TB normal drives be cheaper than one 6 TB helium drive? If the helium drives are substantially cheaper then I could see them getting used in file storage scenarios where speed doesn't really matter.