- Joined
- Mar 7, 2023
- Messages
- 530 (1.29/day)
System Name | BarnacleMan |
---|---|
Processor | 14700KF |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B760 Aorus Elite Ax DDR5 |
Cooling | ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 240 + P12 Max Fans |
Memory | 32GB Kingston Fury Beast 5600 cl36 Oc'd to 6000 cl32 |
Video Card(s) | Asus Tuf 4090 24GB (non-oc version, undervolted) |
Storage | 2TB Netac nv7000 + 2TB P5 Plus + 2TB SN850X + 2*(4TB MX500) in raid 0. 14TB Total. |
Display(s) | Dell 23.5" 1440P IPS panel (P2416D) |
Case | Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH Performance Mid-Tower |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech Z623 |
Power Supply | Gigabyte 850w (ud850gm pg5) |
Mouse | Some piece of shit from China |
Keyboard | Some piece of shit from China |
Software | Yes Please? |
My old ddr4 3200 kit became very unstable if I were to overclock it by even 50mhz. But I bought some 5600 CL36 kingstom fury beast ddr5 for my new motherboard and cpu (13600kf and gigabyte auros b760), even though I wanted 6000 the guy at the store convinced me 5600 would be more stable so I just went along with it. However I found out, at least on some benchmarks that it actually scored worse than my ddr4, probably because of the latency? Not happy with this I tried pushing the mts up, got all the way to 6000 without even touching timings and it performed way better than before ( on passmark, from 88th percentile to 96th, and also increased cpu performance (well obviously - but it was nice to see nontheless).
Ran a stability test for 8 hours with 0 errors. Thats crazy! It even went up to 6100 but I thought maybe I shouldn't push it and brought it back down to 6000. I tried lowering the latency from 36 to 34 without much visible effect. Possibly because I didn't touch any of the subtimings because I really don't know how they work.
Is this normal? Is it safe? Should I try pushing it even more? Or should l maybe educate myself a bit more on how timings work and take that angle instead? Or maybe I should just leave well enough alone and run at 6000 CL36. According to HWmonitor the ram isn't anywhere near hot though I understand overclocking ram can also have a small affect on cpu temps. However with my Artic Liquid Freezer II 240, I'm able to run at max boost frequency indefinitely - or so it seems. So I have a bit of headroom there. And I can't overclock the cpu frequency above what the boost would have done anyway on this motherboard (didn't really think about that before buying... hmmm).
Anyway I've just never had ram that could so easily run above it advertised clock speed. Thats awesome.
Ran a stability test for 8 hours with 0 errors. Thats crazy! It even went up to 6100 but I thought maybe I shouldn't push it and brought it back down to 6000. I tried lowering the latency from 36 to 34 without much visible effect. Possibly because I didn't touch any of the subtimings because I really don't know how they work.
Is this normal? Is it safe? Should I try pushing it even more? Or should l maybe educate myself a bit more on how timings work and take that angle instead? Or maybe I should just leave well enough alone and run at 6000 CL36. According to HWmonitor the ram isn't anywhere near hot though I understand overclocking ram can also have a small affect on cpu temps. However with my Artic Liquid Freezer II 240, I'm able to run at max boost frequency indefinitely - or so it seems. So I have a bit of headroom there. And I can't overclock the cpu frequency above what the boost would have done anyway on this motherboard (didn't really think about that before buying... hmmm).
Anyway I've just never had ram that could so easily run above it advertised clock speed. Thats awesome.
Last edited: