FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 26,259 (4.63/day)
- Location
- IA, USA
System Name | BY-2021 |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile) |
Motherboard | MSI B550 Gaming Plus |
Cooling | Scythe Mugen (rev 5) |
Memory | 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB |
Video Card(s) | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT |
Storage | Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM |
Display(s) | Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI) |
Case | Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay |
Audio Device(s) | Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+ |
Power Supply | Enermax Platimax 850w |
Mouse | Nixeus REVEL-X |
Keyboard | Tesoro Excalibur |
Software | Windows 10 Home 64-bit |
Benchmark Scores | Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare. |
The relatively low clockspeeds of X58 are starting to show in games.Man, even x58 is still more than enough for most anything anybody does today. Even the best S775 setups are more than enough, IMO. The speed from newer hardware shines in benchmarks and some specific situations like video encoding, or WCG, stuff like that. Sandy Bridge was the last time Intel really tried to improve raw CPU power. Now, they seem to be focusing on iGPU development and energy efficiency... which isn't really a bad thing. Even for serious gamers, the iGPU now has some use, thanks to QuickSync. I'd like to see something come from AMD, even if it's just quad cores or 6 cores again, but they need to be improved. The way they did Piledriver didn't turn out too well IMO.