• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Xeon e5 v3/v4 for gaming 4k

Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
294 (0.05/day)
Location
Saigon city
System Name Kurise PC
Processor i7 5820k 4,7ghz / Ryzen 1700x 4ghz / 8700k
Motherboard Asus X99 deluxe / MSI x370 gaming pro carbon / z370i strix
Cooling EK evo, xspc slim 360 rad, D5 pump, dual alpha cool GPU mono block, dual xspc 240 radiator, DDC 18w
Memory Crucial sport white 16gb x 8 128gb 2666mhz/ Crucial sport white 16gb x 4 64gb 2933 / ddr4 chinese 32
Video Card(s) GTX 1080Ti SLI / HP gtx 1080 SLI 1850/1520 / 2080ti ref
Storage Lite on 512GB x 3 / Plextor m2 256gb / samsung 970 evo
Display(s) AOC I2769Vm, AOC U3477PQU, AOC I2769Vm / Koios 40''/ eizo EV2730QFX 1:1
Case Xigmatek Elysium / Corsair 750D / Bitfenix prodigy M
Audio Device(s) creative blaster ZX / Blaster ZXR / Blaster x7 lmt + burson v5i upgraded
Power Supply Be Quiet 1200 / Thermaltake toughpower 1200w / chinese 750w sfx PSU
Mouse Asus Echelon/ steelseries black ops II/ james donkey
Keyboard Cm storm quickfire pro / Fire rose steampunk kb/ corsair k70
Software Windows 10
i've got an offer for the x99 SOC champion + e5 2670v3 for 450$, it's very tempting to me to have more cores but the frequency i think is kind of low around 2,x ghz but i mainly gaming at 4k or multi monitor set up so i will get bottle neck for a SLI 1070/1080 or AMD CFX setup ?........the 2011v3 platform does give higher bandwidth which is nice but low frequency cpu is kinda like a trouble.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
1,445 (0.34/day)
Location
Israel
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard B550 Aorus PRO V2
Cooling Corsair H115i RGB Platinum
Memory Gskill Trident Z Neo 3600 2x16GB
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3070 Trio X
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB NVME/Supertalent Teranova 2x1TB
Display(s) Acer XV340CK
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G513 Tactile
Software Windows 10 Pro
Considering it boosts to 3.1ghz it should be fine, it will be even better once new API's are implemented although no one can guarantee when that will happen.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.70/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Single core boosts that high...

That said, you are rocking SLI/CFx with pretty fast cards. You need all the MHz you can get to eliminate a glass ceiling. Not sure I would do it with SLI.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
294 (0.05/day)
Location
Saigon city
System Name Kurise PC
Processor i7 5820k 4,7ghz / Ryzen 1700x 4ghz / 8700k
Motherboard Asus X99 deluxe / MSI x370 gaming pro carbon / z370i strix
Cooling EK evo, xspc slim 360 rad, D5 pump, dual alpha cool GPU mono block, dual xspc 240 radiator, DDC 18w
Memory Crucial sport white 16gb x 8 128gb 2666mhz/ Crucial sport white 16gb x 4 64gb 2933 / ddr4 chinese 32
Video Card(s) GTX 1080Ti SLI / HP gtx 1080 SLI 1850/1520 / 2080ti ref
Storage Lite on 512GB x 3 / Plextor m2 256gb / samsung 970 evo
Display(s) AOC I2769Vm, AOC U3477PQU, AOC I2769Vm / Koios 40''/ eizo EV2730QFX 1:1
Case Xigmatek Elysium / Corsair 750D / Bitfenix prodigy M
Audio Device(s) creative blaster ZX / Blaster ZXR / Blaster x7 lmt + burson v5i upgraded
Power Supply Be Quiet 1200 / Thermaltake toughpower 1200w / chinese 750w sfx PSU
Mouse Asus Echelon/ steelseries black ops II/ james donkey
Keyboard Cm storm quickfire pro / Fire rose steampunk kb/ corsair k70
Software Windows 10
i thought at higher resolution less CPU bound =.=!
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.70/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
That is correct... but since you are using multiple GPUs, you want as much CPU speed as you can. SLI/CFX scales with CPU speed in many titles.

Here is a quick article: http://www.ocaholic.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=1257&page=4

EDIT: That article is 1080... hmm... I know it is less CPU bound the higher you go, but its due to the cards and the data it is using is why it scales.
 

Kanan

Tech Enthusiast & Gamer
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
3,517 (1.11/day)
Location
Europe
System Name eazen corp | Xentronon 7.2
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X // PBO max.
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 w/ AM4 kit // 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 in, 1 out)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 @ 3800, CL16-19-19-39-58-1T, 1.4 V
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti modded to MATRIX // 2000-2100 MHz Core / 1938 MHz G6
Storage Silicon Power P34A80 1TB NVME/Samsung SSD 830 128GB&850 Evo 500GB&F3 1TB 7200RPM/Seagate 2TB 5900RPM
Display(s) Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p/144Hz&27" iiyama TN LED 1080p/120Hz / Samsung 40" IPS 1080p TV
Case Corsair Carbide 600C
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud Orbit S / Creative SB X AE-5 @ Logitech Z906 / Sony HD AVR @PC & TV @ Teufel Theater 80
Power Supply EVGA 650 GQ
Mouse Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX // Xbox 360 Wireless Controller
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB /w Cherry MX Brown switches
VR HMD Still nope
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15 095 Time Spy | P29 079 Firestrike | P35 628 3DM11 | X67 508 3DM Vantage Extreme
i thought at higher resolution less CPU bound =.=!
Simply spoken, more GPUs need more data feeded, that's why you want a fast processor. Granted that processor is fast, but it's speed is divided onto 12 cores, that's very suboptimal for games of today and tomorrow. It will take a while before 12 cores are properly utilized in games. That said, I'd go for 8 core CPUs maximum + high clocked too, to never be handicapped.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.16/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Simply spoken, more GPUs need more data feeded, that's why you want a fast processor.

...If what you want is the highest possible FPS at a given set of graphical settings, as opposed to the highest possible resolution or graphical fidelity at playable FPS.

That CPU will never be the thing keeping you under 60FPS imo - at least not for a very long time. Improved multi-core optimisation should come on line just in time as its single core performance starts to become inadequate.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
3,842 (0.61/day)
Location
Maryland
System Name HAL
Processor Core i9 13900k @5.8-6.1
Motherboard Z790 Arous master
Cooling EKWB Quantum Velocity V2 & (2) 360 Corsair XR7 Rads push/pull
Memory 2x 32GB (64GB) Gskill trident 6000 CL30 @28 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 Gigagbyte gaming OC @ +200/1300
Storage (M2's) 2x Samsung 980 pro 2TB, 1xWD Black 2TB, 1x SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Display(s) 65" LG OLED 120HZ
Case Lian Li dyanmic Evo11 with distro plate
Power Supply Thermaltake 1350
Software Microsoft Windows 11 x64
Simply spoken, more GPUs need more data feeded, that's why you want a fast processor. Granted that processor is fast, but it's speed is divided onto 12 cores, that's very suboptimal for games of today and tomorrow. It will take a while before 12 cores are properly utilized in games. That said, I'd go for 8 core CPUs maximum + high clocked too, to never be handicapped.

I really can't believe how long it's taken games to get on board with multi-hyperthreading.. It's pretty annoying..
 
Top