Report an Error
NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Graphics Processor
- GF100
- Cores
- 352
- TMUs
- 44
- ROPs
- 40
- Memory Size
- 2.5 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Bus Width
- 320 bit
GPU
I/O
Bottom
Back
Recommended Gaming Resolutions:
- 1366x768
- 1600x900
- 1920x1080
The Quadro 5000 was an enthusiast-class professional graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on February 23rd, 2011. Built on the 40 nm process, and based on the GF100 graphics processor, in its GF100-850-A3 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. The GF100 graphics processor is a large chip with a die area of 529 mm² and 3,100 million transistors. Unlike the fully unlocked GeForce GTX 480 Core 512, which uses the same GPU but has all 512 shaders enabled, NVIDIA has disabled some shading units on the Quadro 5000 to reach the product's target shader count. It features 352 shading units, 44 texture mapping units, and 40 ROPs. NVIDIA has paired 2,560 MB GDDR5 memory with the Quadro 5000, which are connected using a 320-bit memory interface. The GPU is operating at a frequency of 513 MHz, memory is running at 750 MHz (3 Gbps effective).
Being a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro 5000 draws power from 1x 6-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 152 W maximum. Display outputs include: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort. Quadro 5000 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 interface. The card measures 248 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a dual-slot cooling solution. Its price at launch was 2499 US Dollars.
Being a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro 5000 draws power from 1x 6-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 152 W maximum. Display outputs include: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort. Quadro 5000 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 interface. The card measures 248 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a dual-slot cooling solution. Its price at launch was 2499 US Dollars.
Graphics Processor
Graphics Card
- Release Date
- Feb 23rd, 2011
- Generation
-
Quadro
(x000)
- Production
- End-of-life
- Launch Price
- 2,499 USD
- Bus Interface
- PCIe 2.0 x16
- Reviews
- 26 in our database
Relative Performance
Based on TPU review data: "Performance Summary" at 1920x1080, 4K for 2080 Ti and faster.
Performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks.
Clock Speeds
- GPU Clock
- 513 MHz
- Shader Clock
- 1026 MHz
- Memory Clock
-
750 MHz
3 Gbps effective
Memory
- Memory Size
- 2.5 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Memory Bus
- 320 bit
- Bandwidth
- 120.0 GB/s
Render Config
- Shading Units
- 352
- TMUs
- 44
- ROPs
- 40
- SM Count
- 11
- L1 Cache
- 64 KB (per SM)
- L2 Cache
- 640 KB
Theoretical Performance
- Pixel Rate
- 11.29 GPixel/s
- Texture Rate
- 22.57 GTexel/s
- FP32 (float) performance
- 722.3 GFLOPS
- FP64 (double) performance
- 361.2 GFLOPS (1:2)
Board Design
- Slot Width
- Dual-slot
- Length
- 248 mm
9.8 inches
- Width
- 111 mm
4.4 inches
- TDP
- 152 W
- Suggested PSU
- 450 W
- Outputs
- 1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
- Power Connectors
- 1x 6-pin
- Board Number
- P2007
Graphics Features
- DirectX
- 12 (11_0)
- OpenGL
- 4.6
- OpenCL
- 1.1
- Vulkan
- N/A
- CUDA
- 2.0
- Shader Model
- 5.1
GF100 GPU Notes
| GF100 has 4 GPCs each capable of 8 pixels per clock. This limits complete GPU to 32 pixels per clock and because of that it can't feed all 48 ROPs when they all require data at the same time. Additional ROPs however can be used for MSAA (because it doesn't require additional data from rasterizers, while giving more work to ROPs.) |
Jul 2nd, 2022 10:38 EDT
change timezone
Latest GPU Drivers
New Forum Posts
-
by opheenYour PC ATM (32649)
-
by eidairaman1Gpu upgrade, will my PSU be okay ? (5)
-
by eidairaman1MSI ARMOR RX 570 4 GB BIOS (1)
-
by eidairaman1Race room pcvr quest 2 settings (1)
-
by eidairaman1MSI Gaming X 1660 GPU Re-paste thermals (10)
-
by oxrufiioxoWhen will gpu prices return to normal. (270)
-
by eidairaman1Faulty RX 480 8GB Code 43 No artifacting (3)
-
by andreaspujiharMaking Audio Enhancers Work on Windows (2493)
-
by R0H1TCyberpunk 2077’s external QA team allegedly misled CD Projekt article (19)
-
by eidairaman1Assuming same price, what would you buy? (38)
Popular Reviews
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Review - Fantastic Choice for Upgrades from Older Ryzens
- ASRock Radeon RX 6950 XT OC Formula Review
- USB4 is Coming - Everything You Need to Know
- Gigabyte Z690 AORUS Xtreme WaterForce Review
- Gainward GeForce GTX 1630 Ghost Review - Challenging the AMD RX 6400
- Cyberpunk 2077: FSR 1.0 vs. FSR 2.0 vs. DLSS Comparison Review
- Upcoming Hardware Launches 2022 (Updated Jul 2022)
- XMG NEO 15 E22 Laptop (i7-12700H/RTX 3080 Ti) + OASIS External Liquid Cooling System Review - Cool, Quiet, Fast
- MOONDROP Chu In-Ear Monitors Review - $20 ticket to Hi-Fi Audio
- The ASUS TUF Gaming Alliance Revisited
Controversial News Posts
- Intel LGA1851 to Succeed LGA1700, Probably Retain Cooler Compatibility (185)
- Intel Arc A380 Desktop GPU Does Worse in Actual Gaming than Synthetic Benchmarks (158)
- NVIDIA RTX 40 Series Could Reach 800 Watts on Desktop, 175 Watt for Mobile/Laptop (120)
- AMD RDNA3 Offers Over 50% Perf/Watt Uplift Akin to RDNA2 vs. RDNA; RDNA4 Announced (117)
- Windows Defender can Significantly Impact Intel CPU Performance, We have the Fix (116)
- Intel Shows Off its Arc Graphics Card at Intel Extreme Masters (108)
- OEMs Under Pressure from Microsoft to Stop Use of HDDs as Boot Drives from 2023 (93)
- AMD Plans Late-October or Early-November Debut of RDNA3 with Radeon RX 7000 Series (90)