Crysis, is it still the hardest game on your system?

[DrPepper]

World in conflict now thats another game that hits hard, but i think its just badly made IMO.

Actually its one of the best designed games I've seen but when you increase the graphics level of course your going to get bad performance.

 

[RadeonProVega]

I will be doing some benchmarks with my new rig later today, at 1280x1024 high to medium settings. But keep in mind, sound and particles will be on low, but everything else at high to medium.

 

[troyrae360]

Yes it is, i can run it on high, about 20FPS, thats as far as i can run Crysis at the moment.

FarCry 2 isnt as bad as it, i can run it 10+Frames more then Crysis. I thought FEAR 2 would hit hard but no i can run it flat out, max everything 1600*1200 res and get 45FPS.

World in conflict now thats another game that hits hard, but i think its just badly made IMO.

hmm, its definitly not badley made, infact its one of the most polished games ive played, id say you graphix card has alot to answer for if your playing COD WaW, my system playes it flawlessley

 

[Melvis]

Actually its one of the best designed games I've seen but when you increase the graphics level of course your going to get bad performance.

mmmk fair enough, i have only really played the first 2missions or so of the game, and it was awhile ago now, but i just remember if you wanted it to look good you had to put the settings up pretty high because it looked like ass, and when i did wow it came back with low FPS, even tho it still didn't look that great But i must admit i was using the 8600GT back then, so it might be alot better with the 3850.

hmm, its definitly not badley made, infact its one of the most polished games ive played, id say you graphix card has alot to answer for if your playing COD WaW, my system playes it flawlessley

Yea as i said to DrPepper i was using the 8600GT so that might be the main reason why, i play COD WaW flat out as well, and still get good FPS. 1280*1024 around the 60FPS i think.

I will have to run World in Conflict again and see how i go this time using the 3850.

 

[ArmoredCavalry]

hmm, its definitly not badley made, infact its one of the most polished games ive played, id say you graphix card has alot to answer for if your playing COD WaW, my system playes it flawlessley

Ditto on that, World in Conflict runs very well, for how good it looks.

 

[troyrae360]

Damn i just got Empire total war, theres absolutley no way i can play that with all setting turned on!!

 

[Attix]

I'm pretty sure Crysis is pretty high up there with GPU loads and overall usage of your hardware. That, along with GTAIV. Pretty much anything extremely graphic intensive.

 

[RadeonProVega]

Testing out Crysis again, 1280x1024 , anti aliasing x2, all high to medium settings(only sound and texture). 185.50 / BFG 8400GS. I also have a question, how come the game looks really really blured when you set things on high, or is my Nvidia Control Panel settings config wrong?

1280x1024 see how it looks at all high settings:

I have that gamma correction on, is that the problem, or should i change something in the option menu?

 

[Binge]

I think your computer is dying.

 

[RadeonProVega]

I think your computer is dying.

My Pentium III doesn't die, as it ages, it grows in strength, seriously. But anyways, um no , my computer is not dying. I may have to play around with the settings that all, i was just curious did anyone know why it looks so blurred. I think one of the effects is causing it, my guess post processing.

Let me do some more testing.
be back laterZ.

 

[troyrae360]

My Pentium III doesn't die, as it ages, it grows in strength, seriously. But anyways, um no , my computer is not dying. I may have to play around with the settings that all, i was just curious did anyone know why it looks so blurred. I think one of the effects is causing it, my guess post processing.

Let me do some more testing.
be back laterZ.

did you turn motoin blur off? what sort of fps are you getting?

HANG ON haven you got a whole thred on how your P3 is dead!! and that you gonna by a prebuilt system from Dell or Acer or sumthing?

 

[RadeonProVega]

did you turn motoin blur off?

There is no monitor blur option in Crysis, in warhead, but not in crysis. And i manage to fix the problem, by putting post processing on medium instead of high.

What sort of fps are you getting?

With AAX2, High to medium settings, max fps is running solid at 9-13, never dips below 9. I am just testing the game settings out more , because i have switch over to XP using my 8400gs. This game runs so much better now on XP. This game is really really playable on my P3 if i turn off AA and put everything on medium to low, i average around 17-30fps. But i really do not want to play this game at all medium, looks better with some settings on high, so i am still testing around.

HANG ON haven you got a whole thred on how your P3 is dead!! and that you gonna by a prebuilt system from Dell or Acer or sumthing?

No, My Pentium III is fine, my Dell optiplex 210L Intel Celeron D at 3.06ghz was the one that died on me, it was used anyway and had it problems from the start, and it only cost me 40 bucks, so you know.

 

[pantherx12]

I dunno man, you can taxing and horribly optimized, play NWN2, even with my current rig I can only manage about 15-20fps at maximum settings, which is completely ridiculous @ 1280x1024...

I can however run Warhead 1920x1080 Enthusiast with 2x AA for part of the game smooth almost 30ish fps.

Oh gods I thought it was just my card!

If I set everything to high and have it at my native resolution (1400x900) I get 5-10 fps!

 

[RadeonProVega]

Hey, anyone wanna battle me in performance?
1280x1024 , high to medium settings ?

LETS DO IT!

 

[CDdude55]

Wow, thats the PIII system U2K?, looks to good.

And my system is great at 1280x1024 in Crysis, especially at Medium.

 

[Melvis]

Hey, anyone wanna battle me in performance?
1280x1024 , high to medium settings ?

LETS DO IT!

I like to eat P3's and P4's for breakfast

 

[RevengE]

Hey, anyone wanna battle me in performance?
1280x1024 , high to medium settings ?

LETS DO IT!

Your kidding right?

 

[CDdude55]

I have to agree, you need to look for systems on your level U2k, As alot of system on here can do that res with that game like nothing.

 

[RadeonProVega]

Wow, thats the PIII system U2K?, looks to good.

Same rig since 2000, running on 90watts with a 8400GS 512MB PCI(BFG BTW)
Yea crysis does looks nice, which is why i completed the demo 5 times so far I just like looking at the game haha. Even tho Jericho is the best FPS on the planet.

And my system is great at 1280x1024 in Crysis, especially at Medium.

30-40? 20-40? At those settings, they seem to be just right tho.

I like to eat P3's and P4's for breakfast

Well i like to eat old hardware everyday

Your kidding right?

Nope, have some fun dude?
Life is full of fun my friend!

(I'm in a good mood, forgive me )

 

[Melvis]

Well i like to eat old hardware everyday

You be hard pressed to find hardware older then yours to eat on here eg: Celeron 500MHz?

It must take like 10mins to load that game? gezzzz

 

[ShadowFold]

I win

 

[CDdude55]

I'm get around 20- 30's at Medium with no AA more much special effects, everything on high just kills my system if anything else is added.

I can play with somethings on high with no AA, once i add AA it will generally turn into a slideshow.

 

[ShadowFold]

All high 1920x1080 2x AA runs 30-40FPS for me.

 

[CDdude55]

All high 1920x1080 2x AA runs 30-40FPS for me.

Lucky.

 

[pantherx12]

Getting Crysis soon, what is the predicted frame rate on my rig?

1400x900 resolution, but I'd settle for 1024x768