- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 1,380 (0.29/day)
System Name | Desktop |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Xeon E5-1680v2 |
Motherboard | ASUS Sabertooth X79 |
Cooling | Intel AIO |
Memory | 8x4GB DDR3 1866MHz |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 970 SC |
Storage | Crucial MX500 1TB + 2x WD RE 4TB HDD |
Display(s) | HP ZR24w |
Case | Fractal Define XL Black |
Audio Device(s) | Schiit Modi Uber/Sony CDP-XA20ES/Pioneer CT-656>Sony TA-F630ESD>Sennheiser HD600 |
Power Supply | Corsair HX850 |
Mouse | Logitech G603 |
Keyboard | Logitech G613 |
Software | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
Another Thing.. AMD CPUs, Aren't Doing To Bad... When You Take Into Account, They're Only Using Dual Channel Memory, At The Moment & Intel, Are Using Triple Or Quad Channels, To Gain Performance...
Wait Until An AMD MB Uses Quad Channel Memory & Then See How The i7 Competes... Intel Will Fail BIG Time..
It was proven that the benefits are almost none (I'm talking about consumer desktop parts, not servers). AMD has a slow IMC and wold not benefit from more channels if the IMC is slow.
I also don't get your point about the OS, the patch was released and what's done is done, I don't get why people expect a magical 30% increase in performance, it's the chip at fault not the OS.
And if the performance is the same in Win 7 as in Linux I fail to see what exactly is MS doing wrong here.
And I don't get your point that the multi-core kernel has to be rewritten...there are 8-10-12 core chip on the market for quite a while and if I remember right Windows Server 2008 R2 is almost identical to Win 7 and has no problems running 4 CPU's with 12 cores.
There is no magical kernel for BD to shine, the only one who should fix it is AMD.