• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Reported Intel i7-8700K Coffee Lake 6-Core Lineup Leaked

Joined
Jun 22, 2016
Messages
191 (0.06/day)
System Name cryohellinc PC
Processor i7-4770k @4.5ghz
Motherboard MSI Z87 MPOWER
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series™ H115i
Memory Corsair Vengeance 16gb @1600mhz
Video Card(s) MSI Sea Hawk GTX 1080 2100mhz
Storage 3ssd - 64gb (software) ;128 (software + operational system); 256gb - Games + 1TB HDD
Display(s) PG348Q
Case Obsidian Series® 750D Full Tower ATX Case
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster ZxR + Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250Ω
Power Supply Antec High Current Pro HCP-1200 1200W
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei
Keyboard SteelSeries 6gv2 + custom O-Rings. Using Via PS2 connector
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Intel is reacting, not panicking. Why would they drop prices when they're selling their product hand over fist? Remember that in a capitalist environment pricing is ALWAYS set by the buyer. If they have market share and they're basically printing money it would be stupid for them to drop prices.

You can call them the bad guy all you want, but AMD is no different. When they could, just over ten years ago, they were also selling $ 999 processors.
Agreed, however in this case neither is Good or Bad, both of them are Ugly (if you get the reference ;)) This is a normal competition which is finally back, however I have to say that looking on recent actions by Intel + all the rumors that float around, I do think they are hastily trying to close the gaps in their product portfolio to counter AMD. That can be seen in both themselves, and their partners. Sudden release of massive amount of new CPU's, which are all in all, a shrinked version of Xeon's + hastily made Mobo's + major overheating issues e.t.c.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2011
Messages
93 (0.02/day)
Processor i7 6700k
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming/AURA
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 LTT Edition
Memory 2 x 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo 3600MHz CL16-19-19-39
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX580 Nitro+
Storage 970Evo Plus 1TB + 850 EVO 500 GB + WD Red 3 TB + HDST 4TB + Seagate 6TB
Display(s) 2x Asus MG279Q
Case Cooler Master Haf 912 Plus
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex SF-650F14MG
Mouse Logitech G703
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Turbo has never maxed out all cores out of the box :/ Sure, you can overclock all four cores on a 7700K to 4.5 GHz, and the same is true here (more in fact, it overclocks nicely).

My 6700k, with a -0.1V voltage offset, runs Prime95 at 4.2 on all cores with everything else on auto. I don't understand how Turbo Boost actually works on a single core
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
2,063 (0.74/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,486 (2.40/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
My 6700k, with a -0.1V voltage offset, runs Prime95 at 4.2 on all cores with everything else on auto. I don't understand how Turbo Boost actually works on a single core

It's for programs that only use one or two cores, so there's a potential that the turbo boost will go above that of four (or in this case, six) cores.
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
374 (0.08/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Pentium II 400 @ 516MHz
Motherboard AOpen AX6BC EZ
Cooling Stock
Memory 192MB PC-133
Video Card(s) 2x Voodoo 12MB in SLI, S3 Trio64V+
Storage Maxtor 40GB
Display(s) ViewSonic E90
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster 16
Software Windows 98 SE
Agreed, however in this case neither is Good or Bad, both of them are Ugly (if you get the reference ;)) This is a normal competition which is finally back, however I have to say that looking on recent actions by Intel + all the rumors that float around, I do think they are hastily trying to close the gaps in their product portfolio to counter AMD. That can be seen in both themselves, and their partners. Sudden release of massive amount of new CPU's, which are all in all, a shrinked version of Xeon's + hastily made Mobo's + major overheating issues e.t.c.

Core CPUs have been Xeons with certain communication channels and ECC Reg memory support disabled for a very long time. New generations always bring a large number of new CPUs. The new CPUs don't have overheating issues, the VRMs do when there isn't enough airflow (and there are certain boards not affected by this ;)). The VRM cooling isn't even Intel's design, so you can't blame them for that directly. I say not directly as you can blame them for it indirectly, as the launch being moved forwards combined with vendors working on FOUR platforms simultaneously means that the vendors haven't been able to commit 100 % to X299.

There is a hell of a lot that you can blame Intel for with X299, but address those points directly instead of scraping together wishy washy points that don't account for anything. Blame them for something tangible, such as the lack of PCI-E lanes.

I don't understand how a hundred people who have not seen, never mind used, Threadripper have such deeply seated opinions on the matter.

I get that it's trendy to hate on Intel at the moment, but for crying out loud please have valid reason for hating on them!

My 6700k, with a -0.1V voltage offset, runs Prime95 at 4.2 on all cores with everything else on auto. I don't understand how Turbo Boost actually works on a single core

I have no idea what you'r trying to say :(
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
374 (0.08/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Pentium II 400 @ 516MHz
Motherboard AOpen AX6BC EZ
Cooling Stock
Memory 192MB PC-133
Video Card(s) 2x Voodoo 12MB in SLI, S3 Trio64V+
Storage Maxtor 40GB
Display(s) ViewSonic E90
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster 16
Software Windows 98 SE
Some boards default to using all cores at turbo boost. ;)

That doesn't really matter, as it is not Intel's spec (which is what he's complaining about - the spec is for only two cores boosting to the maximum frequency).
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.57/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I get that. Was just adding a point for clarity as to why he may be seeing the behavior he is seeing. Is that ok, lol???

Feels like he understood how turbo works, but is wondering why p95 runs all cores at 4.2...thelostswede answered that. :)

Rgardless, my post was a value add for clarity...mmmk? :)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
374 (0.08/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Pentium II 400 @ 516MHz
Motherboard AOpen AX6BC EZ
Cooling Stock
Memory 192MB PC-133
Video Card(s) 2x Voodoo 12MB in SLI, S3 Trio64V+
Storage Maxtor 40GB
Display(s) ViewSonic E90
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster 16
Software Windows 98 SE
I get that. Was just adding a point for clarity as to why he may be seeing the behavior he is seeing. Is that ok, lol???

Of course :D It doesn't, however, add validity to his complaint.

As I said, hate on Intel all you want, but please know why you hate them and let it be a valid reason xD
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.57/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
That was his (noname) only post in this thread and he didnt hate on intel...

I digress...not worth it. :)
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
374 (0.08/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Pentium II 400 @ 516MHz
Motherboard AOpen AX6BC EZ
Cooling Stock
Memory 192MB PC-133
Video Card(s) 2x Voodoo 12MB in SLI, S3 Trio64V+
Storage Maxtor 40GB
Display(s) ViewSonic E90
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster 16
Software Windows 98 SE
That was his (noname) only post in this thread and he didnt hate on intel...

I digress...not worth it. :)

You're 100 % correct - I mixed him up with the person who said it's a quad core with a dual core glued on (cryohellinc). I blame posting from my phone :p My bad :)
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,680 (4.15/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores
Processor 2990WX
Motherboard Asrock X399M
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill 3600
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller
Keyboard Keychron K8
Software W10P
I'm just trying to figure out work load a home user would prefer 8 slow Ryzen cores. A workstation is one thing and I do want to give threadripper a go, but if the goal is games AMD is at a loss, these 6 core chips will probably extend that lead even more and quite honestly make the kaby lake quads on x299 even more confusing.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,977 (0.78/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
It's interesting for a change seeing Intel responding to AMD offerings. We've been used to reverse for too long.
The upcoming 6-core has been known since before the launch of Ryzen.

Instead we have a quad core CPU, with Dual core Cpu glued on top of it, which clocks higher.
No, it's a 6-core design.

How is this a new and innovative product? Honestly?
And how is this a bad thing?

The only way I see this competing against say Ryzen 1700 is if it will have fantastic value price.

Recently built a workstation for job, with Ryzen 1800x, fantastic CPU, all cores clocked to 4.0, works flawlessly.

Seems my next home / gaming build will be 1700 unless something changes.
This CPU beats Ryzen 1800X in overall performance.

The 8700k might literally just be a 7800x.
No, i7-8700K is based on Kaby-Lake, not on the more advanced Skylake-X. i7-7800K offers slightly higher IPC, higher memory bandwidth, AVX-512 and various chipset features, if any of these are relevant, it's worth considering. Otherwise i7-8700K will surely offer better value.

If intel sticks with 14nm too long AMD has got them beat. All AMD then has to do is improve zen and maybe even switch to 7nm for zen2 to get more cores in the same die space and zen is apparently also very cheap to produce, unlike Intel's competition, so AMD could just drop the prices 20-30% and keep the budget crown.
Intel 14nm is much denser than Samsung 14nm, so for a fair comparison Samsung will be "~20nm". Intel is planning to release the "lower end" Cannonlake on 10nm later this year, with it's next new architecture Icelake on 10nm around end of next year.

I'm just trying to figure out work load a home user would prefer 8 slow Ryzen cores.
You know, synthetic benchmarks to demonstrate its "superiority".
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,680 (4.15/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores
Processor 2990WX
Motherboard Asrock X399M
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL
Memory 4x16GB G.Skill 3600
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller
Keyboard Keychron K8
Software W10P
You know, synthetic benchmarks to demonstrate its "superiority".

It isn't even great there. I swear if I see one more cinebench says its best post I'll blow my brains out.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
234 (0.05/day)
Location
Pekanbaru - Riau - Indonesia - Earth - Universe
System Name My Best Friend...
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
Motherboard Made By Xiaomi
Cooling Air and My Hands :)
Memory 3GB LPDDR3
Video Card(s) Adreno 510
Storage Sandisk 32GB SDHC Class 10
Display(s) 5.5" 1080p IPS BOE
Case Made By Xiaomi
Audio Device(s) Snapdragon ?
Power Supply 2A Adapter
Mouse On Screen
Keyboard On Screen
Software Android 6.0.1
Benchmark Scores 90339
After 7 Years... Nice..

But I will wait for Vodka Lake, Coke Lake, Cappucino Lake, Sake Lake, etc...
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
374 (0.08/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Pentium II 400 @ 516MHz
Motherboard AOpen AX6BC EZ
Cooling Stock
Memory 192MB PC-133
Video Card(s) 2x Voodoo 12MB in SLI, S3 Trio64V+
Storage Maxtor 40GB
Display(s) ViewSonic E90
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster 16
Software Windows 98 SE
The 8700k might literally just be a 7800x. If intel sticks with 14nm too long AMD has got them beat. All AMD then has to do is improve zen and maybe even switch to 7nm for zen2 to get more cores in the same die space and zen is apparently also very cheap to produce, unlike Intel's competition, so AMD could just drop the prices 20-30% and keep the budget crown.

So let's hope Intel isn't just stretching skylake's lifespan as much as possible with minor upgrades (really minor since you need a good-great cooler to really make use of extra stock clocks and overclockability) and they're finally dropping down to a 10nm or even a 7nm proces node.

Um, since when have TSMC or Samsung been better at manufacturing than Intel? You can bet your bottom dollar that Intel will retain their lead for the foreseeable future.
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
484 (0.13/day)
Location
Fort Sill, OK
Processor Intel 7700K 5.1Ghz (Intel advised me not to OC this CPU)
Motherboard Asus Maximus IX Code
Cooling Corsair Hydro H115i Platinum
Memory 48GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4 3200 Dual Channel (2x16 & 2x8)
Video Card(s) nVIDIA Titan XP (Overclocks like a champ but stock performance is enough)
Storage Intel 760p 2280 2TB
Display(s) MSI Optix MPG27CQ Black 27" 1ms 144hz
Case Thermaltake View 71
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 1000 Platinum2
Mouse Corsair M65 Pro (not recommded, I am on my second mouse with same defect)
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 1803
Benchmark Scores Yes I am Intel fanboy that is my benchmark score.
I am all for 8700K if it Overclock anything like my 7700K which is 5.1+ Ghz anytime, any day with minimal effort.

It's interesting for a change seeing Intel responding to AMD offerings. We've been used to reverse for too long.

I am more interested in weather INTEL will solder die & HS or utilize cheap glue once more. I hope they have learned their lesson from past and if not INTEL should get ready to issue another statement to advise consumers not to OC their K series chip. But things do not look very promising since their HEDT now even use Thermal paste.


Some boards default to using all cores at turbo boost. ;)

In ASUS motherboard's BIOS, you can simply select SYNC ALL CORES and you have all cores running at max speed e.g. 4.5Ghz in 7700k regardless of the load type. Easy Overclocking for you.

Depending on the BIOS, once you enable X.M.P profile, it auto enables SYNC all cores.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.88/day)
Um, since when have TSMC or Samsung been better at manufacturing than Intel? You can bet your bottom dollar that Intel will retain their lead for the foreseeable future.

I'd say TSMC is on the same level as Intel and they have proven their worth many times with advanced and reliable processes. You have to understand that TSMC is a fabricator for 3rd parties. When they come to their engineers and tell what they want fabed, they are probably best at what they do. You can't take Intel product and Intel fabs where engineers of both work together since initial plans and compare that with TSMC where 3rd parties come to them with already planned stuff and they have to make it. Sure they are in touch from day one most likely, but they can't ever have same communication as when it's everything inside of the same company.

Btw, MSI board that I have also has an All Core turbo option. And I'm pretty sure Ryzen boards have similar option.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,681 (1.39/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
No, i7-8700K is based on Kaby-Lake, not on the more advanced Skylake-X. i7-7800K offers slightly higher IPC, higher memory bandwidth, AVX-512 and various chipset features, if any of these are relevant, it's worth considering. Otherwise i7-8700K will surely offer better value.

Those perf increase are only on paper. In real word scenarios, eg: games, the 7700K uttery smoked the 7800X.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
767 (0.18/day)
Location
Poland
System Name THU
Processor Intel Core i5-13600KF
Motherboard ASUS PRIME Z790-P D4
Cooling SilentiumPC Fortis 3 v2 + Arctic Cooling MX-2
Memory Crucial Ballistix 2x16 GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (dual rank)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ventus 3X OC 12 GB GDDR6X (2610/21000 @ 0.91 V)
Storage Lexar NM790 2 TB + Corsair MP510 960 GB + PNY XLR8 CS3030 500 GB + Toshiba E300 3 TB
Display(s) LG OLED C8 55" + ASUS VP229Q
Case Fractal Design Define R6
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V381 + Monitor Audio Bronze 6 + Bronze FX | FiiO E10K-TC + Sony MDR-7506
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Logitech M705 Marathon
Keyboard Corsair K55 RGB PRO
Software Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks in 2024?
Really curious about the price of the i5. Six highly clocked cores is exactly what I want.
 
Top