• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Top AMD RDNA4 Part Could Offer RX 7900 XTX Performance at Half its Price and Lower Power

Joined
Jun 29, 2023
Messages
543 (1.11/day)
Location
Spain
System Name Gungnir
Processor Ryzen 5 7600X
Motherboard ASUS TUF B650M-PLUS WIFI
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assasin 120 SE Black
Memory 2x16GB DDR5 CL36 5600MHz
Video Card(s) XFX RX 6800XT Merc 319
Storage 1TB WD SN770 | 2TB WD Blue SATA III SSD
Display(s) 1440p 165Hz VA
Case Lian Li Lancool 215
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO 80Ohm
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 750W 80 Plus Gold
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Keychron V6
VR HMD The bane of my existence (Oculus Quest 2)
So AMD's best card will be about the performance of a low-end RTX 5070 or 5060. AMD really are incompetent. Good thing they were gifted an amazing CPU architecture that is easy to iterate on, otherwise they would be bankrupt by now.
We know no details on blackwell, and if ADA is anything to go by then it might be better than both, and besides, not having a high end gpu does not mean not being able to beat nvidia in the other important areas. (Let's remember a 4060 cannot beat a 3060ti, and the 4070 is roughly on par with the 100usd more expensive 3080, in MSRP anyways)
But having a good Halo class gpu does tend to make people think higher of your lower end products, no matter how underwhelming.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.51/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
We know no details on blackwell, and if ADA is anything to go by then it might be better than both, and besides, not having a high end gpu does not mean not being able to beat nvidia in the other important areas. (Let's remember a 4060 cannot beat a 3060ti, and the 4070 is roughly on par with the 100usd more expensive 3080, in MSRP anyways)
But having a good Halo class gpu does tend to make people think higher of your lower end products, no matter how underwhelming.
But it does mean AMD does not go forward for another 2 or so years. Is that good in your book? AMD will be 3 generations behind nGreedia, which puts immense pressure on AMD to claw back that vast perf gap. If AMD aren't careful, Intel will catch up and maybe overtake them, then AMD/Radeon is finished. I would be very worried if I were Sony/Microsoft...

I would assume that unless nGreedia is going to separate their AI and Consumer GPU designs, then we should expect at least another 40-60% perf from Blackwell. But at what cost, well, that's only limited by Jensen's greed and arrogance.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Messages
1,605 (1.43/day)
I desperately hope they don't abandon the high-end. At least one other company needs to compete with nVidia there, don't care if it's Intel or AMD. Just, some kind of pressure...
For what? Monkey wants banana. People pay 200% more for 20-30% more performance, it makes no sense for AMD to spend hundreds of millions developing another high-end chip just for you to end up buying Nvidia at a discount.

Anyway, the performance of the XTX @ $400 is a great offer. If we had an effective MCM solution it could be 2x the performance of the XTX at US$800-1000.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2023
Messages
543 (1.11/day)
Location
Spain
System Name Gungnir
Processor Ryzen 5 7600X
Motherboard ASUS TUF B650M-PLUS WIFI
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assasin 120 SE Black
Memory 2x16GB DDR5 CL36 5600MHz
Video Card(s) XFX RX 6800XT Merc 319
Storage 1TB WD SN770 | 2TB WD Blue SATA III SSD
Display(s) 1440p 165Hz VA
Case Lian Li Lancool 215
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO 80Ohm
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 750W 80 Plus Gold
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Keychron V6
VR HMD The bane of my existence (Oculus Quest 2)
Yeah yeah why not, next you'll tell me the pigs would fly too :wtf:
Hand me over a cannon, catapult, trebuchet or a suspiciously strong man and I'll make it happen.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,168 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
Just when I was wondering if I should swap my 7800 XT for a 7900 XTX. I guess the answer is no.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,751 (0.61/day)
This will probably get an 80 CU config with a 256-bit memory interface and a TBP of 300W. Ray tracing capabilities could be increased as well as the clock speed to match 7900XTX performance. AMD could possibly combine two of these on a next, next gen SKU at 3 nm.

I assume a simpler, easier to manufacturer part (read higher volume yields) is because AMD is prioritizing higher end silicon to CDNA.

There is also a good chance that AMD is betting on Nvidia abandoning the mid-range to budget discrete desktop GPU space. This would leave AMD (RDNA4) and Intel (Battlemage) to compete in the sub $500 price bracket.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2024
Messages
138 (0.49/day)
Location
TPU censorship
Processor AMD
Motherboard AMD chipset
Cooling Cool
Memory Fast
Video Card(s) AMD/ATi Radeon | Matrox Ultra high quality
Storage Lexar
Display(s) 4K
Case Transparent left side window
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Deepcool Gold 750W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Yes
VR HMD No
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Yes
For what?

For keeping the competitiveness alive.
AMD is several years behind with their RDNA architecture. They need something new and something soon in order to stay relevant.

Monkey wants banana. People pay 200% more for 20-30% more performance, it makes no sense for AMD to spend hundreds of millions developing another high-end chip just for you to end up buying Nvidia at a discount.

That's not exactly right. AMD offers worse performance per money as is. Look at the benchmarks.
RTX 4090 is 71% faster than RX 7900 XTX for approximately 95% more money (1850 euros vs 950 euros).
Given Nvidia's far superior brand recognition, AMD is the big underdog and loser here.
Second tier manufacturer.

1706524248184.png
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,922 (4.74/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / R9 380 2 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / MSi G2712
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / Corsair CX650M / DQ550ST [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
There is also a good chance that AMD is betting on Nvidia abandoning the mid-range to budget discrete desktop GPU space.
I don't see a reason why NV should abandon this segment.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,168 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
For keeping the competitiveness alive.
AMD is several years behind with their RDNA architecture. They need something new and something soon in order to stay relevant.
Then tell us what the point is in AMD spending millions to develop a high-end chip just so that you can buy Nvidia at a reduced price?

There is nothing to compete with the 4090, and even if there was, people would still buy the 4090 over anything, so what's the point in trying to compete where you can't?

That's not exactly right. AMD offers worse performance per money as is. Look at the benchmarks.
RTX 4090 is 71% faster than RX 7900 XTX for approximately 95% more money (1850 euros vs 950 euros).
71% more performance for 95% more money? How is that better? :kookoo:
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
601 (0.31/day)
Location
Moscow, Russia
Processor Intel 12600K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X
Cooling CPU: Noctua NH-D15S; Case: 2xNoctua NF-A14, 1xNF-S12A.
Memory Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 @3600CL16 2*16GB
Video Card(s) Palit RTX 4080
Storage Samsung 970 Pro 512GB + Crucial MX500 500gb + WD Red 6TB
Display(s) Dell S2721qs
Case Phanteks P300A Mesh
Audio Device(s) Behringer UMC204HD
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 560W
Mouse Glorious Model D-
If this is true (press x to doubt), then the only remotely reasonable explanation I can imagine is that they want to allocate more to CDNA, where the big money is. Also why would Jensen abandon the mid-range market where they still outsell AMD without even trying.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,751 (0.61/day)
I don't see a reason why NV should abandon this segment.
This requires looking at Nvidia’s revenues and product trajectory from both AMD and Intel. Nvidia makes the lionshare of its money on compute GPUs and Gaming GPUs with higher margins at the high end. NVidia already abandoned the sub $300 4050 SKU. There are now three players in the sub $500 space: AMD, Intel and Nvidia. AMD plans to increase the CU count up to 40 in their APUs.

There is no advantage for Nvidia to compete against APUs, Battlemage and RDNA4 just to sell a low margin SKU. Its too crowded at the low end and the margins aren’t worth it. Something similar also happened with Nvidia discontinuing mobile MX processors in the laptop space as mobile APUs and SoCs became faster. I predict Nvidia will drop the RTX 5060 parts and only sell 5070/5080/5090 parts in its next GPU series.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,168 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
This requires looking at Nvidia’s revenues and product trajectory from both AMD and Intel. Nvidia makes the lionshare of its money on compute GPUs and Gaming GPUs with higher margins at the high end. NVidia already abandoned the sub $300 4050 SKU. There are now three players in the sub $500 space: AMD, Intel and Nvidia. AMD plans to increase the CU count up to 40 in their APUs.

There is no advantage for Nvidia to compete against APUs, Battlemage and RDNA4 just to sell a low margin SKU. Its too crowded at the low end and the margins aren’t worth it. Something similar also happened with Nvidia discontinuing mobile MX processors in the laptop space as mobile APUs and SoCs became faster. I predict Nvidia will drop the RTX 5060 parts and only sell 5070/5080/5090 parts in its next GPU series.
That's because they're still selling the 3050 and 3060 (heck, even the 1650). What I suspect is, Nvidia will make the 5070-80-90, and keep selling 30 and 40 series cards in the lower segments to keep development costs at a minimum. Mid-range cards aren't and won't be abandoned. Only older models are / will be relegated to mid-range selling points.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,751 (0.61/day)
That's because they're still selling the 3050 and 3060 (heck, even the 1650). What I suspect is, Nvidia will make the 5070-80-90, and keep selling 30 and 40 series cards in the lower segments to keep development costs at a minimum. Mid-range cards aren't and won't be abandoned. Only older models are / will be relegated to mid-range selling points.
Selling previous gen parts instead of the latest series for a certain price segment is tantamount to abandonment in my opinion. Besides the 3050 and 3060 will be really old by year’s end and don’t seem to be going down much in price. They are also mostly refurbished and used. I’m not sure Nvidia will allocate fab capacity to these two SKUs for much longer if they haven’t already stopped.

Edit: If anything gets sent to the fabs from Nvidia at the low end, it will probably be Switch 2 SoCs.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,168 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
Selling previous gen parts instead of the latest series for a certain price segment is tantamount to abandonment in my opinion. Besides the 3050 and 3060 will be really old by year’s end and don’t seem to be going down much in price. They are also mostly refurbished and used. I’m not sure Nvidia will allocate fab capacity to these two SKUs for much longer if they haven’t already stopped.
Then we'll have the 4060 as their replacement. It's a tiny chip on a simple PCB, so I'm sure Nvidia can afford a few price drops on it.
If by "abandonment", you mean not spending money to carve a smaller chip out of the new architecture, then I agree.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
6,016 (2.90/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory 2x16 GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 Rev E @ 3800 CL16
Video Card(s) RTX3080 Ti FE
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) LG 34GN850P-B
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Audio Device(s) SoundBlaster G6 | Fidelio X2 | Sennheiser 6XX
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Endgame Gear XM1R
Keyboard Wooting Two HE
Sounds like a big disappointment if AMD is going to abandon at least trying to go head to head against Nvidia.
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
44 (0.02/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard ASRock B650E PG Riptide WiFi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory Kingston Fury Beast 32GB 5600 MHz CL36 @ 6200 MHz
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6600
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Power Supply Corsair RM550x
The YouTube link is dead.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,168 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
Sounds like a big disappointment if AMD is going to abandon at least trying to go head to head against Nvidia.
If they manage to go head to head in the mid-range, I'll consider it a win. Personally, I don't care about the top tier, and I doubt that many people do.
 

silentbogo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
5,538 (1.38/day)
Location
Kyiv, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS X570-PLUS TUF Gaming
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240mm AIO
Memory 4x8GB Samsung DDR4 ECC UDIMM
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
Storage ADATA Legend 2TB + ADATA SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case ghetto CM Cosmos RC-1000
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic SSR-550FX (80+ GOLD)
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Modecom Volcano Blade (Kailh choc LP)
VR HMD Google dreamview headset(aka fancy cardboard)
Software Windows 11, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
I don't see a reason why they would abandon the high end when the biggest margins are there!
There could be a number of reasons. Highest margins ≠ Highest profit, and even margins are highly debatable, once you factor in things like R&D, cost of development, yields, and of course modern day manufacturing and logistics problems.
But given that Moore's Law Is Dead deleted that video, I assume he's not that confident in his "predictions" either. While the dude is mostly competent, he's just like other youtubers - may guess few things right now and then, but he isn't a tech-Nostradamus.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
338 (0.06/day)
System Name Xajel Main
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard ASRock X570M Steel Legened
Cooling Corsair H100i PRO
Memory G.Skill DDR4 3600 32GB (2x16GB)
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 Ti AMP Holo
Storage (OS) Gigabyte AORUS NVMe Gen4 1TB + (Personal) WD Black SN850X 2TB + (Store) WD 8TB HDD
Display(s) LG 38WN95C Ultrawide 3840x1600 144Hz
Case Cooler Master CM690 III
Audio Device(s) Built-in Audio + Yamaha SR-C20 Soundbar
Power Supply Thermaltake 750W
Mouse Logitech MK710 Combo
Keyboard Logitech MK710 Combo (M705)
Software Windows 11 Pro
I don't see a reason why they would abandon the high end when the biggest margins are there! The issue with AMD this generation is the price, they've got cheaper silicon compared to Nvidia, yet their pricing has been extremely bad, especially at launch.

Imagine the RX 7900XT launching at $800, it would have been an instant hit, it would have been the go to card with enthusiasts, but at $900 it was overexpensive and lacked value, even the 7900XTX was better value.
Then they launched the 7600 at $270 which was a reduction from the $300 price they initially went for, imagine this card launching at $240, it would have been an entry level hit, it would have been the go-to card for people looking for value and as an entry card.

They also screwed up with the 7700XT price, it should have cost $420 at start and it would have been just as popular, if not more than the 7800XT. At $450 it was worse value than the more expensive 7800xt.

According to rumors, there were two reasons
1. RDNA5 is shaping to be promising enough that they have to prioritize more resources to finalize it ASAP.
2. RDNA4 Multi Chiplet design is still inefficient compared to RDNA5, going RDNA4 high-end means a lot of work for diminishing results.

So they could either continue with high-end RDNA4 thus delaying RDNA5 more and gaining little results from the high-end RDNA4 (not competitive enough or even worse than RDNA3 competitive position), or scrap high-end RDNA4 to accelerate RDNA5 development and release.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
601 (0.14/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 3900x
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600CL16
Video Card(s) 3060Ti FE 0.9v
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 1TB, 2x Samsung 840 EVO 1TB
Display(s) ASUS ProArt PA278QV
Case be quiet! Pure Base 500
Audio Device(s) Edifier R1850DB
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III 650W
Mouse A4Tech X-748K
Keyboard Logitech K300
Software Win 10 Pro 64bit
I don't see a reason why they would abandon the high end when the biggest margins are there! The issue with AMD this generation is the price, they've got cheaper silicon compared to Nvidia, yet their pricing has been extremely bad, especially at launch.
Because using these high end chips in AI dedicated hardware gives even higher margins and gamers will always complain about AMD while giving money to nvidia anyway.

Anyway, the performance of the XTX @ $400 is a great offer. If we had an effective MCM solution it could be 2x the performance of the XTX at US$800-1000.
I just hope it's not another DLSS3 moment, where AMD starts using FSR3 numbers on their new cards vs FSR2 with old ones in official PR benchmarks.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
they've got cheaper silicon compared to Nvidia, yet their pricing has been extremely bad, especially at launch.
Any concrete evidence on that, or is it just a hunch?
Before replying consider 2 things:
AMD's profit margins around 40-50%. Nvidia's profit margins at 65-75%.
Nvidia can have more wafers from TSMC and uses them only for GPUs. AMD needs to also use the majority of wafers it gets from TSMC for EPYC and Ryzen CPUs and APUs.
 
Top