1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

14 nm "Broadwell" A True System-on-Chip (SoC)

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 14, 2012.

  1. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,111 (1.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    565
    Just thinking out loud here, but what is the appeal for Intel to make PCIe lanes accessible to anything outside the PCH after everything does truly become a SoC?

    They already have graphics, USB 3.0, Sata 6, etc.

    I'm not trying to be doom and gloom here. Just thinking that outside of server stuff, it doesn't appear to me as if Intel has a compelling reason to make CPU PCIe lanes available.
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  2. hellrazor

    hellrazor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,569 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Easier bandwidth; it's like taking the middleman out.
  3. faramir New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Messages:
    203 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Actually Broadwell is supposed to be a Haswell die shrink from 22 nm to 14 nm.

    Its successor architecture is supposed to be Skylake (14 nm), followed by Skymont (10 nm ?).
    radrok says thanks.
  4. shellx New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I'm trying to imagine what will be the layout of the motherboard with no chipset. The producers will just make sure to have something to differentiate the base models and top models. And above all names to be attached to motherboards. Up to date are based on the chipset name.
  5. Xiphos

    Xiphos New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    233 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    just looking at the picture, and looks like every time we have a chipset architecture change we get a big boost in performance. so skip Haswell and wait for Broadwell?
  6. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,127 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    I think you're reading it incorrectly. What you said is half correct, whenever we have a CPU Architecture change, we get a big boost in performance, not really chipset. So 22nm Haswell will be a big improvement, but 14nm Haswell will be a slight performance gain. Similar to how SB was a big jump in performance, but IB won't really be that huge.
  7. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,356 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    i can see the pros and cons to SOC... pros being power consumption and tdp, cons being the components that would normally be on a motherboard, if they go bad on the cpu there goes your cpu pretty much. overclockers may want to be extra careful with soc cpus.
  8. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    Yeah, I got it mixed up because the change to SoC made me think it would have been a tock.
    Thanks ;)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page