6670 vs 4850 vs GTS 250

[gasolina]

currently i'm a bit confused about those 3 i heard that with newest driver 6670 ~ gts 250 and 4850 overwhelmed those 2 is it correct with the newest driver ?
and 1 more thing , some people also claimed that right now nvidia geforce now is suffering from FPS drop like ati 3k or 4k in the old day and min FPS of 6970 is much higher than min FPS of GTX 570 .
are those 2 statements right now are truth ?.......

 

[HossHuge]

Going by this chart I'd say that the 4850/GTS250 would be faster than a 6670. But don't quote me. But don't forget the 6670 also has DX11.

 

[HossHuge]

Sorry for the double post.... but I just saw this as well.

I remember that a 5750 and 4850 are about the same. But I'm sure that gap has closed a bit with better drivers for the 6670. And the 6670 also has much lower power consumption

 

[gasolina]

@HossHuge is the gap now around 15% to reach 5750.4850,gts 250 lv ??

 

[erocker]

are those 2 statements right now are truth ?.......

No, not true.

 

[HossHuge]

@HossHuge is the gap now around 15% to reach 5750.4850,gts 250 lv ??

After reading a little more. The 5750 is about 8% faster than a 4850 so I'd say the gap between a 6670 and a 4850 is about 5 to 10% in favour of the 4850. However, as I said before the 6670 has DX11 and has much lower power consumption.

Depending on the price, I'd go with the 6670.

 

[eidairaman1]

6750 is the equivalent of a 4850 performance wise just as stated earlier its a DX11 card which will run fine on Win Vista/7.

 

[HossHuge]

6750 is the equivalent of a 4850 performance wise just as stated earlier its a DX11 card which will run fine on Win Vista/7.

Well according to this, the 5750/6750 is just a bit faster...

 

[aBigRat]

currently i'm a bit confused about those 3 i heard that with newest driver 6670 ~ gts 250 and 4850 overwhelmed those 2 is it correct with the newest driver ?
and 1 more thing , some people also claimed that right now nvidia geforce now is suffering from FPS drop like ati 3k or 4k in the old day and min FPS of 6970 is much higher than min FPS of GTX 570 .
are those 2 statements right now are truth ?.......

For the first question : An HD 6670 is a bit faster than an HD 4770. You obviously can put it on par with a 9800GTX. So it should be about 5% slower than an HD 4850 in favor of HD 4850 and GTS 250. Not much.
For the sake of new technology and power savings, get an HD 6670 over those HD 4850, GTS 250. In addition, There is still a lot of OC potential left in HD 6670s while an GTS 250 hardly stands at 800MHz;

For the second question : Yes, AMD HD 6000 series seem to perform a bit better then Nvidia GTX 500 in favor of minFPS lately. Here is a link for you to look at it :
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/01/11/amd_69706950_cfx_nvidia_580570_sli_review/4

 

[Hayder_Master]

As friends say here 6670 is better one.

 

[gasolina]

i want to confirm these 2 things =.=! , the gap between GTS 250 740 vs 6670 core 800 ( DF 2 of 'em) is it 10% or greater or lower than 10% ?
and recently right now GTS 250 used to be 7 or 10% faster than hd 4850 but right now it's 7% slower than the 4850 ?

 

[gasolina]

due to what i searched the 6670 overclock at 900 ( 800@900) GPU score around 7k5~7k7 and the 4850 df is 7k8 or 7k9 so it's kinda strange around 5% different in comparison with the 4850 ( both are in default ) .

 

[eidairaman1]

i want to confirm these 2 things =.=! , the gap between GTS 250 740 vs 6670 core 800 ( DF 2 of 'em) is it 10% or greater or lower than 10% ?
and recently right now GTS 250 used to be 7 or 10% faster than hd 4850 but right now it's 7% slower than the 4850 ?

driver improvements

 

[aBigRat]

You cannot judge the performance of a card just with one or two tests. Both HD 4850 and HD 6670 may use VLIW-5 but they are different, just like G200 and GF100. You have to run at least 10 DX9c/10 games to have more accurate results.
I don't see a reason for you to keeping asking about this but I will conclude every thing here:

6670 is a bit slower than 4850, 250. I see this gap is under 10%, not much to actually be counted (just like the gap between GTX 560 and HD 6870).
6670 consumes much less power than 4850 (1/2) and 250 (1/4)
6670 can be OC'ed much higher than 4850 and 250 (by %)

So, If you want to get one out of three, go for HD 6670. I think that's clear enough for you.

 

[gasolina]

@aBigRat t/y i jz got the 6670 , the guy from the pc store give me it from my old 5770 =.=!.... yeh i jz tested myself around 5% the gap is