1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD FX-8350 Cracks 7.443 GHz

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 22, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,601 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,646
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    AMD's next-generation FX series processors may be just around the corner, but OC feats around its flagship model, the FX-8350, are already beginning to take shape. Chinese overclocker Ma Yuchuan (马宇川) achieved 7.443 GHz with the FX-8350, except with just one of its four modules enabled (two cores). The clock speed of 7443 MHz was set with a base clock of 244.3 MHz, and multiplier of 30.5X. A core voltage of 1.968V was used, and the chip was cooled with liquid nitrogen. 8 GB of dual-channel DDR3-1600 MHz memory by Patriot was used, and seating it all was Gigabyte 990FXA-UD7 motherboard. Find the CPUID validation here. The feat still trails Andre Yang's 8.71 GHz on FX-8150. That's not to say that the FX-8350 isn't as good a chip with overclocking, not enough enthusiasts have their hands on it, yet.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Expreview
     
  2. BlackOmega

    BlackOmega

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Messages:
    624 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Not bad. Was he able to run super-pi or anything?
     
  3. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    Good to see they are already clocking up. Wonder what we will get out of them with all modules enabled and stable on air/water. Hopefully in the 5.5ghz+ range easy.
     
  4. Disruptor4

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    227 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Good feat, but I think I'd like to see right now is how they compare clock for clock with BD. What kinda IPC changes have they done? Voltage changes? etc etc
     
  5. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,827 (1.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Wonder whats faster this or a stock FX-8350 with all of its cores, for real.
     
  6. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,615 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Really only about to about 7.5% max IPC increase. Maximum of 15% increase from the higher clocks.
     
  7. tacosRcool

    tacosRcool

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    860 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    Does it fare better than the older AMD chips in terms of performance?
     
  8. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,673 (4.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,027
    arent all these chinese announcements usually fake?
     
  9. Hustler New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    100 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39

    Lol..that still makes them slower clock for clock than a Phenom II.

    :rolleyes:
     
  10. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,605 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    :slap:

    this was just a minor improvement, AMD appears to be more focused on steamroller

    now lets compare a 8350 to a 8150 at same clock speed then a 8320 to a 8150, then a 8320 to 8120
     
  11. nt300

    nt300

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    868 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Toronto, ON. Canada
    They are both from different gens. Clock for clock means nothing, but compared to the Bulldozer yes you can make that comparison.
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  12. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,605 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    architecture is different.

    Good design poor execution.

    btw didnt the Bulldozer only reach 8 GHz on a single core and not a module where as this hit 7+ with a module (contains 2 cores), I mean wouldnt that technically be faster than that Bulldozer then
     
  13. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,185 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,976
    Location:
    Home
    Well done to him for getting good results, but I suspect this will not matter too much just like how the Pentium 4's managed insane clockspeeds but no meaningful way forward.
     
  14. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,605 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    hey you recall BD breaking a OC record, wasnt that just with a single core and not a module since a module contains 2 cores sharing certain resources internally
     
  15. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    BD hit 8,4xxGHz sometime in September, but as you guys said, I think only on 1 core/1 module. Either way, I'm sure we'll keep hearing about higher and higher records on PD as well.
     
  16. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,185 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,976
    Location:
    Home
    Yes I vaguely remember BD snatching the OC crown, but I am not convinced until I see tangible results in commercial applications (read: them start selling Bulldozers clocked at 5Ghz etc.)
     
  17. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,605 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    ok a FX 8 has 2 cores per module and 4 modules per CPU.

    FX 6 has 3 modules

    FX 4 has 2 modules
     
  18. w3b New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Messages:
    68 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Location:
    Australia
    Article features a CPUID validation so perhaps that may not be the case in this instance :confused:

    Agent 86: "Missed it by that much." :p
     
  19. No_Asylum New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2012
    Messages:
    83 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    These tests are stupid and pointless. NO ONE uses their PC this way. Show us how high it will overclock with the best air or water cooling available. Not this ridiculous Liquid Nitrogen crap that has zero real world implications.
     
  20. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,116 (2.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    917
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    Its just done to see the limits. Like jet cars breaking the sound barrier or F1 racing. No one is going to use their car like that.
     
  21. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    8.7ghz in Nov of last year with one entire module running

    [​IMG]

    Please don't troll. No one cares what you think about CPUz and max clocks.
     
  22. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    I agree, But this is kind of good in a way. At least they will be able to see how far they can push the silicon and thus may even net us higher speeds for future stuff. Maybe AMD will have us stock 5GHz Chips in another years time, that will clock to 6.5GHz on Air! Now this would be very impressive!
     
    eidairaman1 and nt300 say thanks.
  23. nt300

    nt300

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    868 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Toronto, ON. Canada
    Will all due respect, what is wrong with running liquid 24/7? I use liquid nitrogen and it great. :rolleyes:

    High clocks are great, it shows you how much that silicon can be pushed.
     
  24. anubis44

    anubis44

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    70 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Why do I have such a nagging feeling that if these were results for an Intel processor, you'd be shouting about how it proves the superiority of Intel's overclocking ability, and how that would apply even for air or liquid coolers, too...

    As others have said, this kind of overclocking is done to show the upper limits of the process technology and to push the boundaries to the extreme. Of course nobody is going to run their system on liquid nitrogen on a regular basis - nobody here is saying anything of the kind. But these results do give us some glimpse into the overclockability of this CPU, even using more conventional cooling methods. I just bought a closed loop water cooler for the first time, and I'm very excited to see what the new Vishera chips can do on water now.
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  25. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,605 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    Ya the troll below probably would praise Intel on such a high overclock, probably did it with the 65nm P4 Cedarmill model at the time too. I dont need to say anything more as everyone quoted above has said it for me.

    go troll elsewhere
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page