1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Intros Athlon II X2 Models 240 and 245

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 22, 2009.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,201 (11.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,572
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    Nearly six weeks into the introduction of the Athlon II X2 250, AMD added two new models in the series to choose from the Athlon II X2 240 and 245 are clocked at 2.80 GHz and 2.90 GHz respectively, and occupy two lower places in the series. The 240 has a bus multiplier of 14.0x 200 MHz, while 245 is a notch higher, at 14.5x 200 MHz. The chips are based on AMD's 45 nm Regor core, which is a monolithic dual-core, with two physical cores on a die, and no L3 cache. The L2 cache per core instead, has been increased to 1 MB, which makes it 2 MB of total external cache for the chip. It uses a lavish 4.0 GT/s HyperTransport 3.0 system interface, and comes in the AM3 socket package that supports DDR2 and DDR3 memory standards. The two will be out soon and will be priced around the US $65 mark.

    [​IMG]
  2. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,664 (6.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,838
    Damn, I was hoping they would go up, not down...Hopefully a 260 is on the way.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. Semi-Lobster

    Semi-Lobster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    353 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Maybe these will have a lower TDP? Breaking the 45W mark for dual-cores would be a dream come true for HTPC builders
  4. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    Cheaper is the only way to fight when your opponent is Intel.
  5. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,664 (6.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,838
    I'm pretty sure undervolting the 250 gets you pretty close already.

    No, I'm pretty sure they have plenty of room to increase clock speeds to compete with some of the higher processors. The 250 is only a 65w processor after all...
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2009
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    how is this an issue?
  7. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    I'm sure they do, too. That's why, if they haven't, it's because they know it won't be worth their time and money to do so, and have obviously decided to compete on the lower cost market.

    Unless you know better that their teams of financial planners and strategists. ;)

    Is it because these chips will use a lot less power than just a crippled quad-core that's been turned into a dual?
    [I.R.A]_FBi says thanks.
  8. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,664 (6.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,838
    At this point I think I just might...

    As I don't see how competing at the higher profit margin areas would be a bad thing in any way.

    Edit: Although, now that I look at it closer, releasing higher models would probably start to hurt the 550 sales, as the 250 and 550 perform pretty similarly already. Though I would still like to see a 260BE...

    Edit2: The 245 is already at newegg for $66.99, putting it right there with the E5200.
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2009
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,201 (11.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,572
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    It's not a quad-core with failed/defective/disabled cores, in other words, there's nothing for you to unlock :)
    [I.R.A]_FBi says thanks.
  10. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,883 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
  11. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,664 (6.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,838
    Your right, sorry. I was looking at this, but I think I had the numbers for the E6300 loaded, but had changed the drop down box to say E5200 and didn't hit the compare button again to get it to load. Thats what I get for jumping back and forth between too many tabs.:laugh:
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2009
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,883 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    Still you are right, they are close, and the 5200 does lead in some of the tests
  13. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    I wonder how they compare in terms of OCing?
  14. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,664 (6.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,838
    I don't know, I really want to get my hands on one of the Athlon II X2's to play with, but just can't afford it right now.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,883 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    I have a weery feeling that the 5200 will out-clock it
  16. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    I really wish I had a newer AMD board that supports the newer cpus. I'm stuck with brisbanes and windsors.
  17. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    wow, nice comparative numbers to the 5200. About time they put out something to compete.
  18. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,664 (6.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,838
    I have the feeling also. I've been hearing 3.8-3.9GHz is about the max for the Athlon II, obviously extreme cooling can get it higher I'm sure.

    I seem to want to say the E5200 maxes about at about the same, maybe even higher. For some reason I think 4.0GHz+ might be entirely possible with the E5200. And since the E5200 already comes close to matching the 250, once both are clocked roughly the same I think the E5200 will take it.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  19. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    Well, from what I can tell, c2d still has the per clock advantage over these.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page