1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Announces PQ321Q Pre-Order: The World's First Consumer 4K Monitor

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 2, 2013.

  1. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    At 3840 x 2160 I'm sure AA is not needed.
     
  2. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,873 (11.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,716
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Exactly, so when Anantech mentions "maxed out," I'm sure they're cranking up AA unnecessarily, as well.
     
  3. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    They used SSAA for Sleeping Dogs...

    Two GPUs are fine for 4K gaming with lots of eyecandy imho.

    Once AMD/ATI gets rid of the frametime issues we'll probably have good performance at reasonable price tags with their next series.
     
  4. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    782 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    83
    Also take note that Seiki has announced a 39" 4K UHDTV for ~$699. It will almost certainly be limited to 30Hz refresh rate but the price is hard to pass up on,.....

    Pre-orders were supposed to start in late June at Sears online.

    There was also supposed to be a 65" Seiki 4K UHDTV in the fall.

    ***edit***

    Seiki SE39UY04 39 Inch LED 4K 120hz Ultra HDTV

    http://www.buydig.com/shop/product....catargetid=1889113596&cadevice=c&&cagpspn=pla
     
    Prima.Vera says thanks.
  5. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,271 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Can you use 2xHDMI for 60hz on this one?
     
  6. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    782 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    83
    I don't know enough about the Seiki SE39UY04 39" 4K monitor to say but the price and previous example of the Seiki SE50UY04 would suggest otherwise.

    Simply put, a 4K monitor (UHDTV) at 39" and ~$699 is something the industry as a whole is lucky to have. I personally wouldn't look this particular gift horse too hard in it's (most likely) 30Hz limited mouth,...... :)

    I'm seriously considering getting one for desktop use and possibly even the Seiki 50" or 65" 4K,......(as I would like a bigger HDTV).

    But then again gaming isnt my only goal.
     
  7. xorbe

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    421 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    63
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    Exactly what cable connections are required to drive this thing with a single Titan? Frame rate limited?
     
  8. RCoon

    RCoon Gaming Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    7,791 (8.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,918
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    The day gamers wittle themselves down to 30hz 4K gaming is the day I'll eat my own hat in surrender that things are going down the toilet :D

    I can understand people saying that with everything maxed out with AA and SSAO on 4K is going to slow things down alot, and many saying that eye candy anti-jaggies options wont be used on 4K because of its high quality. But you know, people like to say "yeah my rig can run anything on max". When people start buying these things, they'll have to say "yeah I can run most of the settings on high with zero anti-jaggies".
    I still believe jaggies will be present on 4K in some situations. I also dont believe many devs will make games for 4K in the near future, perhaps futher along the timeline maybe.
    I dont know what it is, everyone is all excited about 4K, but the idea to me just smells slightly fishy, as if its some kind of rushed gimmick they're giving us. Maybe I'm just paranoid and overly withdrawn about the idea of 4K at this point. Especially because of the cost, and the still high cost of 1200+ monitors.
     
  9. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    782 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    83
    I hear what you are saying,....believe me,....

    I'm still willing to try it and as I said I'm not only interested in gaming. I might buy and try an Asus PQ321 as well but again I don't have a one track mind with a focus only on gaming.

    From my perspective looking and lusting after 4K monitors with a gaming centric focus is like someone lusting after a GTX Titan for web surfing or data entry,....
     
  10. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,271 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    what different tech?? Both are LCDs...:eek:
     
  11. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Not sure if you're serious

    one is IGZO and the other is S-MVA
     
  12. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,899 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,417
    Hey don't you say nothing bad bout Quake Live dangit!
     
    Aquinus says thanks.
  13. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,690 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,343
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I could do some Quake 3 Arena right now. :p
     
  14. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,271 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    IGZO is a semiconducting material not a TFT technology. Forget the marketing non-sense crap.

    /nvm
     
  15. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    You don't seem to get the point w/e. Don't worry.
     
  16. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,271 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Sure I don't get the point on how a 50" TV can costs almost x3 times less than a 32" monitor. I don't think the image quality on the Asus monitor is x2.5 times better than the one of that TV.
     
  17. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,690 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,343
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Higher pixel density does cost more money to produce. Pixels on a 50" screen are going to be much larger than pixels a 30" screen if the resolution is the same. The cost to produce a TV is different than the cost to produce a 30" display. Consider for a moment that you have to cram everything from that 50" into something that is almost half the size. Miniaturization costs money, not to mention the cost to the consumer for a decent profit margin, but that's not all of it.
     
  18. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,271 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    So in other words a phone display with 450PPI (5" - 1080p) should cost as much as a car.
    (4K on 32" is "only" 170PPI btw...)
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2013
  19. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,690 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,343
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    ...but you're also talking about a panel that is only 5" big. Bigger panel with same pixel density is going to cost more to make.
     
  20. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,419 (1.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,259
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    to add to Aquinus' post, not only that, but with a larger panel size, when retaining the pixel density, the price grows almost exponentially, not linearly. The same is true in reverse.
     
    Aquinus says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Seems like to get 60Hz it has to be handled like two separate monitors, even on DP 1.2

    Doesn't surprise me since is the same monitor as the Sharp

    [​IMG]

    Picture from OCN
     
  22. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    It is however supported by dual link dvi...curious if it is a dual connection.
     
  23. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,419 (1.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,259
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Probably dual, since it requires 4x the bandwidth of a 1920x1080@60 or 2x the bandwidth of 1920x1080@120
    Since 1920x1080@120 is already near the upper bandwidth limit of a dual-link DVI, simple math says it would need 2x DL-DVI cables.

    EDIT: That also implies a single DL-DVI cable should be enough for 3840x2160@30
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  24. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    I read on another forums guys :


    So basically DP 1.2 can drive 4k at 60Hz but there is not controller capable :banghead:
     
  25. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,271 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    295
    I wonder what kind of cables, controllers and ports will use the Japanese for their 8K@120Hz TVs!! :))
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page