• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Readying a 144 Hz 4K Ultra HD Monitor

Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,476 (1.40/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
In my opinion, 4K is good for huge TVs but not so for desktop monitors. All the 1080 movies looks washedout and low res now, games looks sharper then ever but the textures start to look low even on ultra; you need GPU horsepower to play games smoothly, windows apps support is mediocre to say the least, etc
 

Gin-year-bread

New Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
They're not exactly scientific/standard where ATSC/PAL standardized 480i, 720p, 1080i, and 1080p.

"2K" generally means 2000 pixels wide. "4K" generally means 4000 pixels wide. "8K" generally means 8000 pixels wide.

They usually describe height has being a 2:1 ratio width:height.

Tech people/companies, like Apple for example would disagree with that. 2K was 2048 in the 90's and it is still today 2048. A 4K iMac "happens" to have a 4096x2304 resolution, which just "happens" to be two times 2K.
Their 5K iMac are also 5K: 5120x2880.

Same thing with 2K / 4K texture maps: 2048x2048 / 4096x4096.
 
Top