1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 CrossFireX Tested

Discussion in 'News' started by Jimmy 2004, Feb 4, 2008.

  1. Jimmy 2004

    Jimmy 2004 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    5,491 (1.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    267
    Location:
    England
    Admittedly this isn’t the first review of AMD’s new 3870 X2 running in CrossFireX, but it does seem to give a better indication of real world performance. As in the previous test, this article shows unimpressive 3DMark scores, but as the author is quick to point out, 3DMark06 is known to be quite heavily dependent on the CPU so doesn’t always give a reliable indication of real world GPU performance. More interesting are the benchmarks of Call of Juarez and F.E.A.R., which show performance increases of around 50% and 75% respectively. It’s important to remember that AMD’s CrossFireX driver is still in development, but these figures should give a rough idea of what is to be expected. You can read FPSLABS’ full article here.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: FPSLABS
  2. paul06660

    paul06660 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    84 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Dynamite Planted!!!
    (at the Nvidia Command Post)
  3. Hawk1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,249 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    163
    Location:
    The Big Smoke, Canada
    Looks very good. Not that I would go Quadfire, but good to know it will (should) scale very well. Man, nothing but good news for AMD/ATI the past several days. There must be two moons in the sky or something.
  4. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    So... anyone got a copy of this CrossFireX "evaluation" driver...? ;)
  5. moto666 Guest

    Sweet sweet!
  6. Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,509 (6.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,107
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    it's interesting to see that it seams to do amazingly well on the older DX9 games. it does good on new games too but, most of the benches i've seen have used mostly older games.
  7. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,921 (6.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    If only I hit the lotery :p looks like ATi got good drivers out for once
  8. zOaib New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    985 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    FL
    :D:D yay
  9. InnocentCriminal

    InnocentCriminal Resident Grammar Amender

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,486 (1.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    847
    Interesting article, better than the Tom's Hardware one.

    I plan to eventually have CrossfireX, once I've got the most out a single card. If they don't release a 2nd revision of the card that uses a updated PCI-bridge chip I may just stick with one. Depends...
  10. Ravenas

    Ravenas

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,635 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Wow, I've always wanted to try Crossfire or SLI. Seems like nows the time! Nice work on ATI's part! :toast:
  11. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,912 (5.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,063
    Location:
    Ohio
    I detect extreme cpu bottlenecking, even on a 4GHz C2Q Extreme 45nm...

    On second thought, I detect extreme bottlenecking of everything.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. REVHEAD New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    300 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Sydney/ Australia

    Yep even my 8800 gtx sli setup is seriously bottlenecked with quad core @ 3.820 and 4 gig of ram, even more compounded when I run 2560x1600res, these cards will never reach there potential unless a cpu is overclocked under phase, cpu is allways the limmiting factor, and it suxs.
  13. OrbitzXT

    OrbitzXT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,969 (0.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    New York City
    In most games isn't the GPU bottlenecking, not the CPU? The only time you ever see a CPU bottleneck is with benchmarks like 3dMark. Why would the frames of these games improve so much with the addition of a second card? If one card was bottlenecked by the CPU, a second card shouldn't result in a drastic increase of frames. I remember reading a good post here that explained it all, and that most users are just unaware of how bottlenecks work and always assume the CPU is bottlenecking just because of 3dMark scores.
  14. imperialreign

    imperialreign New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,043 (2.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    909
    Location:
    Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
    I think it also has a lot to do with specific CPUs. The P4's are notorious for bottlenecking high end cards. The 1950s, for example, are great VGA adapters, but when coupled with a P4, they just don't shine like they should.

    With the addition of my second card, on average I only saw 15-25% increase in performance (whereas I was hoping to see the typical 25-35% increase), depending on the app and how heavily GPU intensive it was.

    Damn, I can't wait to get away from this CPU, though :banghead:
  15. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,760 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,468
    these are quite early drivers .. some benchmarks even see -35% (yes i have the drivers) and amd has not released them for this reason. if the public opinion is "sucks" on launch, they have to do massive positive pr afterwards
    Mussels and WarEagleAU say thanks.
  16. imperialreign

    imperialreign New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,043 (2.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    909
    Location:
    Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
    it would seem, then, that ATI is trying to avoid another 2900 repeat?

    Still, though, from what all we've seen, there's some massive potential behind these cards - ATI's prob burning the midnight oil on them.
  17. HaZe303

    HaZe303 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    305 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Sweden (08-Stockholm)
    Very impressive. I though I saw in some other bench that a single 3870x2 got like 13000-14000 on 3dmark06? Now it shows 20000?? Maybe it is the cpu that made the difference?? Maybe time to move over to ATI?? Nah, ill wait for Nv g9, and then decide which is best for me. Propably most others will do the same, its a shame that ATI got this "break" at this wrong time.
  18. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,088 (2.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    913
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    hmmm, not quite familier with that allusion, care to elaborate?

    I really want one of these cards, I hope to manage to sell my pro and for the GDDR4 version to come out soon, I just won't settle for GDDR3, i'm sorry.
  19. imperialreign

    imperialreign New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,043 (2.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    909
    Location:
    Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
    it means that they're working extra overtime to get stuff done (working late into the night)
    AphexDreamer says thanks.
  20. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Extremely good news on the ATI front. This card is starting to look very good. I hope to see a high end from them sometime this year.
  21. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,668 (7.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,980
    Location:
    some AF base
    at low res the cpu the limiting factor at high res its the vid card i seriously doubt your C2Q is the issue @2560x1600


    back on topic how about 3/4x3870X2?
  22. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    You wouldn't call the 3870 X2 "high-end?" :p
  23. happita

    happita

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,355 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    394
    :laugh:
  24. REVHEAD New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    300 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Sydney/ Australia

    Ok how would you explain the same setup running a overclocked 4ghz quad getting an extra max 12 fps in 3dmarks 2006? and the same setup running 3.6ghz max 12 fps less in 3dmarks test 1 and 2? hmm I have done 100s of tests and benchmarks, the limmiting factor and I quote "is the CPU"

    What systems have you tested this theory on?
  25. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,668 (7.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,980
    Location:
    some AF base
    are you kidding me 3dmak is massively cpu biased run a real game and watch the fps. want prtoof its biased my 7800GS is oc'd quite high in games it performs better than the ones i have seen on faster cpus but a lower gpu speed, but in 3dmark i come up in last place....gee i wonder if thats got anything to do with the program?


    and an extra 12fps is nice if it went from 12fps to 24fps but i doubt that it did that would show cpu bottlenecking going from 100fps to 112fps however does not

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page