1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Braidwood Technology and P57 Chipset Get The Axe, Sources Claim

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Aug 19, 2009.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,691 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,664
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Intel's so codenamed "Braidwood" technology, which was touted to be a successor for Intel Turbo Memory, in which a supplementary high-speed, low-latency NVRAM module is used to speed up booting, application startup, and enhance system responsiveness in general, is shelved for now, and will not be part of Intel 5-series chipsets' feature-set, according to industry sources. As a result, Intel P57, a variant of P55 that officially supports it, will not be implemented, as Braidwood is the principal difference between it and P55. Several motherboard manufacturers already have the hardware-side of the technology ready, as several high-end LGA-1156 motherboards have been spotted with Braidwood NVRAM slots, or at least placeholders of the same. The software-side of it, however, seems to be the problem child, sources explained.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: DigiTimes
     
  2. Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,509 (6.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,107
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    GB p55-ud5 already has it built onboard. the boards have been boxed and are in transit to retail chains already.

    i dont think its totally scrapped.

    maybe the actual cards but not the feature itself.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  3. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,691 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,664
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Like I said, boards already have it, but it will stay useless (rudimentary), if the sources are right.
     
    Fitseries3 says thanks.
  4. Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,509 (6.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,107
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    someone will make a way to utilize it i bet.
     
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,691 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,664
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
  6. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,258 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    966
    Intel has made the right choice. They have had a product development/marketing team running out of control. Too many derivative products, too many SKUs. Let the motherboard manufacturers determine the scope of what they want to build for what target market. They dont need Intel telling them how to do that with many many different bins of varying chipsets.

    And with SSD now taking off and coming down in price, braidwood was idea too late.
     
  7. IINexusII

    IINexusII

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2009
    Messages:
    909 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Location:
    London, UK
    the old intel turbo cache thing didnt get very popular anyway so its a good thing its scrapped
     
  8. REVHEAD New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    300 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Sydney/ Australia
    Yes I have to agree, with SSD and Sata 3 ect, its just a little to late for this tech, the gains would be negligable at the most.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page