- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,984 (0.35/day)
Processor | Intel Core i9 9900k @ 5.1GHZ all core load (8c 16t) |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MEG Z390 ACE |
Cooling | Corsair H100i v2 240mm |
Memory | 32GB Corsair 3200mhz C16 (2x16GB) |
Video Card(s) | Powercolor RX 6900 XT Red Devil Ultimate (XTXH) @ 2.6ghz core, 2.1ghz mem |
Storage | 256GB WD Black NVME drive, 4TB across various SSDs/NVMEs, 4TB HDD |
Display(s) | Asus 32" PG32QUX (4k 144hz mini-LED backlit IPS with freesync & gsync & 1400 nit HDR) |
Case | Corsair 760T |
Power Supply | Corsair HX850i |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Lightspeed on powerplay mousemat |
Keyboard | Logitech G910 |
VR HMD | Wireless Vive Pro & Valve knuckles |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
After ATi had already shut the door on CUDA running on ATi hardware natively
Again i'll have to correct you on this - it is not native support. It is emulation. Emulation is almost always inefficient and buggy when trying to run hardware supported calculations on hardware which does not have those exact calculations supported. You would not get a very good result running CUDA on STREAM hardware (on the 4k series) because CUDA had things such as double floating point precision (i think that is correct, been a while since i looked into the fundamental differences), which stream and the 4k series did not have, so the emulation would needto do a lot more calculations to perform the same task, and even then it isn't guaranteed that the emulation would work with 100% compatability.
Anyway i feel this is getting too far off topic, if you want to discuss this further open up a new thread and we can look into it in detail there.