imperialreign
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2007
- Messages
- 7,043 (1.15/day)
- Location
- Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
System Name | УльтраФиолет |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Kentsfield Q9650 @ 3.8GHz (4.2GHz highest achieved) |
Motherboard | ASUS P5E3 Deluxe/WiFi; X38 NSB, ICH9R SSB |
Cooling | Delta V3 block, XPSC res, 120x3 rad, ST 1/2" pump - 10 fans, SYSTRIN HDD cooler, Antec HDD cooler |
Memory | Dual channel 8GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 @ 1800MHz @ 7-7-7-20 1T |
Video Card(s) | Quadfire: (2) Sapphire HD5970 |
Storage | (2) WD VelociRaptor 300GB SATA-300; WD 320GB SATA-300; WD 200GB UATA + WD 160GB UATA |
Display(s) | Samsung Syncmaster T240 24" (16:10) |
Case | Cooler Master Stacker 830 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro PCI-E x1 |
Power Supply | Kingwin Mach1 1200W modular |
Software | Windows XP Home SP3; Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 |
Benchmark Scores | 3m06: 20270 here: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12313 |
Thanks for all the responses so far, guys, and nice to see Tatty still around, eh?
My current setup is a standard DVI-I single-link DVI cable (although, I have a full-blown DVI-I dual-link cable, but it's not compatible with most monitors).
So, then, there's no difference in actual HDMI cables between the standard revisions? There's not BS differences like USB 1.1/2.0 cables?
As well, if HDMI uses a higher refresh rating, and a monitor that supports both DVI and HDMI inputs should be able to accomodate the higher refresh, correct? (if such is the case, I myself might actually go ahead and whip out the HDMI cable - I get that "refresh banding" across the screen in some games using DVI)
So, DVI can support up to 2560x1600 res? I was always lead to believe it only support upto 1920x1200. Or is there a difference that's limited only between a single-link and dual-link cable?
@newtekie - DVI has become capable of audio pass-through? Do you have a reference link? I'm really interested in reading up some more on that capability.
My current setup is a standard DVI-I single-link DVI cable (although, I have a full-blown DVI-I dual-link cable, but it's not compatible with most monitors).
HDMI has only 2 versions. HDMI and mini HDMI. The version numbers are updates to the standard.
So, then, there's no difference in actual HDMI cables between the standard revisions? There's not BS differences like USB 1.1/2.0 cables?
As well, if HDMI uses a higher refresh rating, and a monitor that supports both DVI and HDMI inputs should be able to accomodate the higher refresh, correct? (if such is the case, I myself might actually go ahead and whip out the HDMI cable - I get that "refresh banding" across the screen in some games using DVI)
So, DVI can support up to 2560x1600 res? I was always lead to believe it only support upto 1920x1200. Or is there a difference that's limited only between a single-link and dual-link cable?
@newtekie - DVI has become capable of audio pass-through? Do you have a reference link? I'm really interested in reading up some more on that capability.