First Alleged GTX TITAN-X Benchmarks Surface

[the54thvoid]

Darn you made me reply.

I haz the control

 

[15th Warlock]

 

[Crap Daddy]

From what I gather from different leaks taken with the obvious grain of salt, in very short it's around 50% faster than a 780ti while consuming around the same 260W and it'll be around 1000. Given that Apple sells watches which appear to be smart and will be obsolete next year for 10.000 I think Nvidia is doing what it can and has to do. Brand value, performance and high margins. Viva el capitalismo. Take or leave it.

 

[Daemmon]

Given that Apple sells watches which appear to be smart and will be obsolete next year for 10.000

As much I don't like Apple (I do like Lemmy tho) 10k is for the Apple "Gold" Watch, that's the kind of thing some dumb rich person would buy just because they can afford it and think they are cool wasting money. The "down-to-earth" models start at 299 or 399 can't remember correctly.

 

[arbiter]

Ah, you want me to tell you whether fake 390X scores are higher than fake Titan X scores, well it's my opinion that they could be either a fake percentage higher or lower.
As for actual performance, I made my observations known based on architecture scaling for the Titan X. As for the 390X, who knows?.

We will see pretty soon Titan X's performance as its gotten in the hands of reviews in last day or so. So independent benchmarks and power draw will be showing up in next few days or so. Pcper podcast which was recorded about 5 hours ago as i post this had the box on their desk and had the card in their office. The real test will be 4k as the amount of ram titan X has is what it will be best area.

 

[HumanSmoke]

We will see pretty soon Titan X's performance as its gotten in the hands of reviews in last day or so. So independent benchmarks and power draw will be showing up in next few days or so. Pcper podcast which was recorded about 5 hours ago as i post this had the box on their desk and had the card in their office. The real test will be 4k as the amount of ram titan X has is what it will be best area.

Aye, with the launch due on or around the 17th, actuality isn't that far away. More interested in the die size and overclocking potential. 12GB of GDDR5 takes a large bite out of the board power budget as the K6000 has demonstrated.

 

[Sony Xperia S]

you're sad

How do you know that I'm sad? What if it isn't true?

... and have a basic inability to formulate a coherent argument - guess that is predictable as well.

The basic inability is in some of you who don't wanna understand and accept what I'm saying.

you want me to tell you whether fake 390X scores are higher than fake Titan X scores, well it's my opinion that they could be either a fake percentage higher or lower.

No, I meant something you answered there:

As for actual performance, I made my observations known based on architecture scaling for the Titan X. As for the 390X, who knows?.

So, basically you have no clue but still argue over fake or not which actually is irrelevant.

 

[Tatty_Two]

Can we cease the 2 or 3 man theatre show now, enough of the hijacking (again), if I have to come in this thread again because of multiple reported posts I will just have to take the easy option and remove some of you..... thank you!

 

[Caring1]

Can we cease the 2 or 3 man theatre show now, enough of the hijacking (again), if I have to come in this thread again because of multiple retarded posts I will just have to take the easy option and remove some of you..... thank you!

Fixed it for you

 

[fullinfusion]

Wow one card is smokin!

my 290X and 290 non X on the same run only score X8637 at stock clocks on a quad core cpu..

Nice to see a huge jump in scores from the green camp but fingers crossed the AMD 3 series do as well if not better.

 

[64K]

Wow one card is smokin!

my 290X and 290 non X on the same run only score X8637 at stock clocks on a quad core cpu..

Nice to see a huge jump in scores from the green camp but fingers crossed the AMD 3 series do as well if not better.

The 390/390x will be a huge jump too. These are good times for PC gamers. Lightning fast GPUs from both sides. We are well on our way to a single GPU solution to very high/ultra settings on 4K (no AA) 60+ FPS in most games. ~3 years imo. Then the enthusiasts will want 8K.

 

[fullinfusion]

The 390/390x will be a huge jump too. These are good times for PC gamers. Lightning fast GPUs from both sides. We are well on our way to a single GPU solution to very high/ultra settings on 4K (no AA) 60+ FPS in most games. ~3 years imo. Then the enthusiasts will want 8K.

lol I hear ya, but I think your comment about 3 yrs from now should've read 3 yrs ago. We needed/wanted this performance boost but it's just a game to the makers imho.

But cool beans is all I gota say on this next jump in performance... I just hope I dont face palm when the AMD bring there cards out....

 

[Xzibit]

The 390/390x will be a huge jump too. These are good times for PC gamers. Lightning fast GPUs from both sides. We are well on our way to a single GPU solution to very high/ultra settings on 4K (no AA) 60+ FPS in most games. ~3 years imo. Then the enthusiasts will want 8K.

Lets hope we wont be playing the same 720p or luckily 1080p developed game scaled to 4k or 8k.

Memories of Doom 1 + 1080p texture pack = 1080p game At least the textures looked better.

 

[trenter]

I can never figure out all the complaints from people about the price of these cards. Obviously Nvidia knows what its doing, that's why it has twice the market share that AMD does. The high price of cards like these benefits even those who aren't buying this card. It adds money for Nvidia to reinvest on a better performing next architecture, which means for those of us buying the GTX 760/960 or 770/970s, we'll probably see some of the technology passed down.
It's the same thing as cars like the Ford GT or Nissan GT-R, can sit there and complain all day long about the price but the fact is, if you are complaining about the price of it you probably can't afford it even without the markup, so why complain or even care about the price? The point is it's a halo product designed to draw attention to the series and get high end buyers to come to the product line and pump money into it. Both Intel and Nvidia do this to AMD on CPU and GPU side, and I'm sure AMD is trying to figure out how it can do this as well.

 

[BiggieShady]

Inside this case from gdc2015 there is a radeon R9 390X, but AMD didn't want to show it ... case doesn't look well ventilated based on where it's positioned so it seems stock coolers are better this time round.

image courtesy pcper

 

[Caring1]

I heard they hid the latest release Corvette in there that is due to appear at the upcoming motor show too

 

[arbiter]

Inside this case from gdc2015 there is a radeon R9 390X, but AMD didn't want to show it ... case doesn't look well ventilated based on where it's positioned so it seems stock coolers are better this time round.
View attachment 63357
image courtesy pcper

Well that would seem to support that leaked AIO water cooler that AMD was reported to be working on to keep it cool but other thing to consider is the demo they were running on it, you don't know how much load was even on the gpu to start with so.

 

[BiggieShady]

I heard they hid the latest release Corvette in there that is due to appear at the upcoming motor show too

Yeah, AMD had to respond somehow to Nvidia entering the automotive industry

other thing to consider is the demo they were running on it, you don't know how much load was even on the gpu to start with so.

Well it was the UE4 Showdown demo at occulus rift booth (car flipping thingie).