1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

First NVIDIA GeForce Titan 780 Performance Numbers Revealed

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 31, 2013.

  1. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    the 690 is dual 680's on one card
  2. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,981 (3.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    I know we have a bang-head-on-wall smilie and a few others, but we REALLY need a face-palm added.
  3. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,084 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    441
    And? I still don't see how the 780 can be faster than the 690 when you compare the specs.

    K20X

    Shading Units: 2688
    TMUs: 224
    ROPs: 48
    SMX: 14
    Pixel Rate: 41.0 GPixel/s
    Texture Rate: 164.0 GTexel/s
    Floating-point performance: 3,935.23 GFLOPS

    GTX 690:
    Shading Units: 1536 x2
    TMUs: 128 x2
    ROPs: 32 x2
    SMX: 8 x2
    Pixel Rate: 29.3 GPixel/s x2
    Texture Rate: 117.1 GTexel/s x2
    Floating-point performance: 2,810.88 GFLOPS x2
    ThunderStorm says thanks.
  4. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,738 (2.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,043
    GK 110 has 15 SMX 2880 CC. K20x is running at 732 MHz. If this Titan is a fully enabled GK110 and runs at 1GHz we might see something.
  5. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    981 (0.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    216
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    It won't run at 1 GHz my algorithms put it close to ~900 MHz.
  6. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,084 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    441
    Does the 3Dmark even benefit from CC? Aren't they meant for computing?

    If it is running at 1GHz, it still seems weird to me...where do those 1000 points come from if the 690 is running around 950MHz.
  7. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    sorry, my point was that the 690 is spec'd the same as a 680, just two of them.

    if the 780 has 6gb of memory like the link a few posts back says it does that could go a long way towards achieving that score, in addition to a fully loaded 110 clocked higher i think we have a winner, an expensive one but a winner
  8. NHKS

    NHKS New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    596 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    It would be great 'if' this score turns out true/close, when the card is launched, which I doubt


    [​IMG]

    but can anybody tell if Extreme preset is GPU memory + DP perf(compute/physics) dependent? I ask this because of the expected 6GB Vram and that GK110 has much better DP performance than GK104
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2013
    fullinfusion says thanks.
  9. tokyoduong

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    464 (1.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    117
    Unless this is one humongous, power hungry, expensive and low yielding chip then I don't see how this can be possible. I guess we'll just wait and see.

    If this is true then prepare for sticker shock! and 300+W requirements.
  10. fullinfusion

    fullinfusion 1.21 Gigawatts

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    7,755 (3.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,697
    I believe I just found a replacement gpu :D
  11. Fluffmeister

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    546 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    154
    This is a balls deep high end card, and I personally can not wait! :cool:
  12. Bytales

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    32 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    va Ares II

    This shot is in time to wipe the floor with the ARES II card. If that x7100 is from a single GPU, you can bet your ass ill stick 2 inside my rig.
  13. BarbaricSoul

    BarbaricSoul

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,764 (2.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,548

    (Looks at 7970) Rumor has it it's the one I'm leaving you for,Rumor Has It, Rumor Has It, Rumor Has It





    :shadedshu I'm sorry, I couldn't resist :laugh:
    jmcslob says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,865 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    428
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    Well holy shit....
    I'm actually not sure what to say if this is accurate...except this card is gonna cost a lot but will be worth it if under $700
  15. tokyoduong

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    464 (1.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    117
    or the movie starring jennifer aniston
  16. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,146 (13.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,597
    Not believable. Especially if this GPU is actually based on GK110, the numbers just don't make any sense.

    Wishful thinking from some Chinese enthusiast I would say.
    PatoRodrigues, Melvis, v12dock and 3 others say thanks.
  17. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,128 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,355
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    Got to remember dude - all rumours and one of the main ones was it has 85% the performance of the 690.

    Only now an oddly high x7100 score pops up - which seems unlikely, especially for the rumoured power envelope.

    We'll all see soon enough. :toast:
  18. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,080 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    802
    Agreed, it's performance that cannot be achieved even with a full GK110 core
  19. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,246 (1.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    Ahhh, someone with some sense! A wise cat you are indeed sir :pimp:

    Same old same old from Nvidia marketing dept but i'll take the post, it helps mah peenUs grow :p
  20. blibba

    blibba

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    815 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    178
    Location:
    Oxford, UK

    Everything benefits from CC. They are the modern equivalent of shaders. Core-count and bus width are the main differences between low-end and high-end cards.
  21. xvi

    xvi

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,688 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    730
    Location:
    Washington, US
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. Yellow&Nerdy?

    Yellow&Nerdy?

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    349 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Pretty spectacular performance. A new 8800 GTX it certainly is not: you didn't have to cough up 900 bucks to get it.
  23. Fluffmeister

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    546 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    154
    The rumoured price is crazy, but you can guarantee not long after it's launch you'll see people with two, three even four of them topping all the benchmarks.
  24. xcaninox

    xcaninox

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2010
    Messages:
    13 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Brazil
    awesome performance, horrible price..

    900 dollars is A LOT of money.. no chance i'll pay that for a VGA.
  25. Scrizz

    Scrizz

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,665 (1.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    317
    what good ol' days lol.

    I remember radeon 9800xt was like $500
    and that was 10 years ago :eek:

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page