Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 31, 2013.
the 690 is dual 680's on one card
I know we have a bang-head-on-wall smilie and a few others, but we REALLY need a face-palm added.
And? I still don't see how the 780 can be faster than the 690 when you compare the specs.
Shading Units: 2688
Pixel Rate: 41.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate: 164.0 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance: 3,935.23 GFLOPS
Shading Units: 1536 x2
TMUs: 128 x2
ROPs: 32 x2
SMX: 8 x2
Pixel Rate: 29.3 GPixel/s x2
Texture Rate: 117.1 GTexel/s x2
Floating-point performance: 2,810.88 GFLOPS x2
GK 110 has 15 SMX 2880 CC. K20x is running at 732 MHz. If this Titan is a fully enabled GK110 and runs at 1GHz we might see something.
It won't run at 1 GHz my algorithms put it close to ~900 MHz.
Does the 3Dmark even benefit from CC? Aren't they meant for computing?
If it is running at 1GHz, it still seems weird to me...where do those 1000 points come from if the 690 is running around 950MHz.
sorry, my point was that the 690 is spec'd the same as a 680, just two of them.
if the 780 has 6gb of memory like the link a few posts back says it does that could go a long way towards achieving that score, in addition to a fully loaded 110 clocked higher i think we have a winner, an expensive one but a winner
It would be great 'if' this score turns out true/close, when the card is launched, which I doubt
but can anybody tell if Extreme preset is GPU memory + DP perf(compute/physics) dependent? I ask this because of the expected 6GB Vram and that GK110 has much better DP performance than GK104
Unless this is one humongous, power hungry, expensive and low yielding chip then I don't see how this can be possible. I guess we'll just wait and see.
If this is true then prepare for sticker shock! and 300+W requirements.
I believe I just found a replacement gpu
This is a balls deep high end card, and I personally can not wait!
va Ares II
This shot is in time to wipe the floor with the ARES II card. If that x7100 is from a single GPU, you can bet your ass ill stick 2 inside my rig.
(Looks at 7970) Rumor has it it's the one I'm leaving you for,Rumor Has It, Rumor Has It, Rumor Has It
:shadedshu I'm sorry, I couldn't resist
Well holy shit....
I'm actually not sure what to say if this is accurate...except this card is gonna cost a lot but will be worth it if under $700
or the movie starring jennifer aniston
Not believable. Especially if this GPU is actually based on GK110, the numbers just don't make any sense.
Wishful thinking from some Chinese enthusiast I would say.
Got to remember dude - all rumours and one of the main ones was it has 85% the performance of the 690.
Only now an oddly high x7100 score pops up - which seems unlikely, especially for the rumoured power envelope.
We'll all see soon enough.
Agreed, it's performance that cannot be achieved even with a full GK110 core
Ahhh, someone with some sense! A wise cat you are indeed sir
Same old same old from Nvidia marketing dept but i'll take the post, it helps mah peenUs grow
Everything benefits from CC. They are the modern equivalent of shaders. Core-count and bus width are the main differences between low-end and high-end cards.
The price is ridiculous. I miss the good ol' days where $350 bought you the top of the line card.
Pretty spectacular performance. A new 8800 GTX it certainly is not: you didn't have to cough up 900 bucks to get it.
The rumoured price is crazy, but you can guarantee not long after it's launch you'll see people with two, three even four of them topping all the benchmarks.
awesome performance, horrible price..
900 dollars is A LOT of money.. no chance i'll pay that for a VGA.
what good ol' days lol.
I remember radeon 9800xt was like $500
and that was 10 years ago
Separate names with a comma.