1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GK110 / GTX 780 pre-launch leaks & info

Discussion in 'NVIDIA' started by qubit, Aug 30, 2012.

  1. TheHunter

    TheHunter

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    981 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Location:
    Europa
    Yeah 780 & 770 only 32 ROPS?

    Seems kinda off, 48 would be more like it, AMD HD8970 apparently has 48 as well.


    I hope they'll keep HyperQ and Dynamic parallelism
     
  2. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,922 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    983
    Yawn... another rumor... :)
     
  3. TheHunter

    TheHunter

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    981 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Location:
    Europa
  4. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,859 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    628
    You seem to be forgetting or glossing over the fact that Tesla product is limited production, super high end, where huge yield lots are not critical as with consumer product, so it's not in fact "perfectly plausible".

    The VR Zone article has it right. Everyone, including Intel, are pushing back latest production goals because every manufacturer out there right now is struggling with these ultra small dies, which obviously affects yields, which in turn affects the quantity and consistency of each model.

    Those are things that have to be dialed in BEFORE mass production begins. Nvidia is not going to want to repeat the base layer defect problem that affected the launch of the 680s, so I doubt they'll be overly anxious to beat AMD to the punch, esp considering the 700s will be a mere reboot of the existing architecture, vs Maxwell.

    I'd be excited about AMD's 8000 series if it weren't for the fact that they never talk about or seem to even acknowledge the need to improve their software. Right now 7970s are going for as low as $330, but the customer feedback isn't so good.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2012
    EarthDog says thanks.
  5. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,941 (3.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    I didn't gloss over anything, it's how I felt about it at the time - 2.5 months ago.

    Judging from a couple of stories I've seen recently (I forget where now, sorry) NVIDIA might still release a graphics card based on this GPU. Perhaps it'll be cut down a bit? I've seen that suggested and would help with the yield problem. Of course, the softening enthusiast market really isn't helping any of this, is it? In the end, I think that there's quite a bit of uncertainty around this, but I still wouldn't rule out a launch by end of December or early January, perhaps.
     
  6. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,859 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    628
    Actually I said forgetting OR glossing over, as it sounded to be one or the other. Again, I feel counting on ANY 700 being released this year or even by Jan seems overly optimistic. If even Intel says they are pushing back production 6 months, that says a whole lot regarding how difficult it is to produce these small die chips in quantities.
     
  7. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,941 (3.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Yeah, you could be right. Too much uncertainty, can't say much more than that, really.
     
  8. NHKS

    NHKS New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    596 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    just for the sake of gossip/speculation..
    GeForce 700 series card - GTX780(GK110) according to source(29Nov).. not to say that i am buying this info without salt!
    [​IMG]
    8+6 pin eh? and whats with that orientation?!!:rolleyes:
     
  9. Slizzo

    Slizzo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    383 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    NHKS says thanks.
  10. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,941 (3.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Hey, December 2012 has been and gone and not a word from nvidia about a GTX 780 type card, lol. Let's hope they launch the bloody thing sometime in the not too distant future. I haven't even seen rumours about it lately, which doesn't bode well.
     
  11. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Yeah I do agree, I feel kinda annoyed by the lack of leaks about any of the new GPUs.

    Could it be that this time the two of Nvidia and ATI will launch their new gen close to each other?
     
  12. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,563 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    If the 680 was really meant to be the 660 then the GK110 will be nvidia's most polished product ever. We've known the specs for months because it's been ready to go for months so I'm expecting a lot.
     
  13. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,941 (3.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,532
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Thng is the card has already been released as HPC accelerator a couple of months ago, so it's not that much of a stretch to expect a graphics card version of it, which is why I'm surprised at the lack of news.

    And yeah, I bet it will destroy every other card out there if they ever make it. Perhaps it's the lack of games requiring that level of horsepower that's putting them off making it, as sales would likely be very low.
     
  14. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    I look forward to see that giant GPU overclocked, I imagine that if the HPC version is 225-250W TDP (as far as I remember) then the desktop version could very well draw 400W overclocked with a waterblock :roll:

    Or maybe not cause Nvidia doesn't want us to play with voltages :shadedshu
     
    qubit says thanks.
  15. T4C Fantasy

    T4C Fantasy CPU & GPU DB Maintainer

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    973 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    411
    Location:
    Uranus
    I love new gpu generations, all the benchmarks, the trolling, the architecture white papers! :D :D :D
     
  16. ViperXTR

    ViperXTR

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,396 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    409
    GPU pre release excitement :D, sometimes wanting is better than having :D

    And i heard the kepler refresh would be bringing back its muscle in the GPGPU part?
     
  17. T4C Fantasy

    T4C Fantasy CPU & GPU DB Maintainer

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    973 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    411
    Location:
    Uranus
    if it uses gk110 then yes
     
    ViperXTR says thanks.
  18. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,571 (3.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,682
    Would be great for a "crunching" GPU as AMD is currently the "king of the hill" (World Community Grid).
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  19. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,485 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,698
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    Everyone needs to remember that the full force GK110 (if fully gpgpu enabled) will require a lot of power*. GK104 is so frugal because it's gpu capability is far less than it's Fermi ancestor (compare 580 compute benchmarks/scores with 680).

    *I'm also sure we'll see the same people bitching about how much power the 7970 consumes suddenly say it (power consumption) doesn't matter if/when the proper daddy kepler arrives.

    I do think that had Nvidia got their shit together last year and managed to manufacture a working GK100 then it would have been the same old story of recent years, faster than AMD but more power hungry. I see GK110 being that very card, but working.
     
  20. Kaynar

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    626 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    You know that the 7970 actually consumes about the same as the 680 at standard clocks during gaming... (source: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_680_review,9.html) I saw that a few days ago while looking for some other stuff on several different websites. For 20Watts difference in practice is not much of a difference.

    And i'm sure that nVidia was just waiting for ATI to release their card and see if they would have to "deploy the big guns" or just keep them for the next round, which is what they certainly did.
     
  21. Recus

    Recus

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    533 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    And GTX 680 is faster. Since most recommended is GHz edition: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7970_ghz_edition_review,8.html
     
  22. Vlada011

    Vlada011

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2012
    Messages:
    342 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    I think same it's to early for new series too.
    GTX680 4GB is perfect card, special solder Classified version with backed EVboot connectors.
    Cheat NVIDIA.
    Intel/NVIDIA that's the way.
    And this connectors on back is OK and I love cards when need much power.
    With 8+8 pin and more...
     
  23. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,485 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,698
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    If you post on TPU, it's polite to use TPU's reviews.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/HD_7970_Matrix/26.html

    The 7970 GHz (not the Matrix) beats the 680 on every resolution except 1280x800. And a GHz still clocks lower than your average 680. I'd also like to point out W1zz's test suite is one of the largest out there.

    Point is, had the GK100 seen the light of day, IMO, it would have comfortably beaten the 7970 (10-20%?). But it would have consumed far more power and definitely cost more. 680's are still over inflated price wise.
     
  24. Recus

    Recus

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    533 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    And if TPU review is wrong? Unlike you I read several different reviews of the same product.

    I said GTX 680 is faster than HD 7970, not GHz.

    Because of transistor count I can guess that GK100 is much faster.
     
  25. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,774 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,071
    Well of course. Nvidia has taken AMD and us for a ride. The incompetent masterminds at the helm of AMD, the same that are driving the company to disaster, launched the 7970 clocked conservatively and at an astonishing price - remember? $550. Nvidia on the other hand wasn't ready with the big chip, you know the one that was supposed to be the flagship and compete with the 7970, the infamous GK110. In turn the very manufacturable, smaller and very powerful midrange chip was almost ready. Some tweaks, the ingenious boost and bam!
    You have another flagship which at launch was better by a fair margin than the 7970 and claimed the most important title of the fastest GPU.

    Now imagine what would have happened if AMD would have launched the 7970 clocked as a GHZ edition?
     
    the54thvoid says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page