1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Help: GPU Upgrade

Discussion in 'System Builder's Advice' started by olo94, Dec 31, 2013.

  1. olo94

    olo94

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    13 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Hello I’m having trouble choosing a new GPU upgrade for my setup.

    My current setup is:

    CPU: AMD FX-6300
    Motherboard: ASRock 970 EXTREME3
    RAM: G SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB
    GPU: GIGABYTE GeForce GT 430 (Fermi) 2GB 128-bit DDR3
    PSU: OCZ ZT Series 750W

    I’m basically just having trouble finding something that isn’t too overkill or will be bottlenecked with my current setup. I’m not trying to spend anything above a $300 video card. If there is something that you see that should be upgraded then I will take it into consideration.

    My current video card is starting to die on me:fear:. I mostly use it for watching HD movies, converting, and rarely playing games when/if it can on Steam (Saints Row: The Third, Payday 2, etc.) at 1920 x 1080 on a 23" screen.

    Thanks in advance! :)
  2. DF is BUSY

    DF is BUSY

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2013
    Messages:
    267 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    for 300 and down, you can try to get a used gtx 770, a new gtx 760

    or if you can wait for the cryto-coin craze to fade, you can try to get new or used 7950/70, 280x
  3. Norton

    Norton WCG-TPU Team Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Messages:
    8,369 (8.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18,591
    A Radeon 7870 or 270X (same card) should be fine for your usage and will save you a few $$$. I have no problems with mine and am quite happy with the performance :)
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  4. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,543 (1.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Location:
    Australia
    First of all where are you located? USA? and I agree with Norton a 270x or even an older 7970 possibly?
  5. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,054 (4.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,371
    R9 280 (non X) will do wonders
  6. olo94

    olo94

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    13 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    I'm from the USA. Are you talking about something like these :
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150692
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161442

    I've been recently looking at getting one of these:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127745
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127699

    I'm not too GPU savvy by the way :laugh:
  7. DF is BUSY

    DF is BUSY

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2013
    Messages:
    267 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    any of the 270x are also suitable, they arent extremely powerful but they will last you a good amount of time and you can save some money. they are the equivalent of the 7870's.
  8. thebluebumblebee

    thebluebumblebee

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,879 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,419
    Oh are you ever in for a nice surprise.
    You might be able to get away with something as low as a GTX 650 Ti or 7770(260x).
    Normally, you will not regret buying as much GPU as you can afford. It will last longer than just buying the minimum that you need.
    Also, consider noise levels. The MSI Gaming series are know for being quiet. Especially that MSI GTX 760 Gaming. TPU Review
    25 Million points folded for TPU
  9. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    333 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    72
    I second the emotion on the 760.

    I love my 7870, it has served me well for the price I paid (bought it when they first dramatically dropped to under $200 more than a year ago after nvidia launched the inferior 660 for 229 and amd did the typical thing of underpricing them), and while that level of performance (270x) will probably still work for most people, especially if they overclock, it's hard in good conscience to say the 760 isn't worth the extra couple dollars these days ($230 vs 200), especially if they don't overclock.

    It simply isn't the same battlefield as when a 7870 could be overclocked to greater performance than a stock card (660ti) 50%+ more expensive and that often was enough for 30/60fps avgs at 1080p, it isn't even 25%...It is now 15% more expensive for a slightly better card that will leave you with a better comfort zone, as even though the difference is slight, that extra performance can matter a lot for 1080p thresholds of playability.

    That said, it is around the current bare minimum for 1080p with quality settings, so I would suggest slightly higher for longevity (which spending over $200 on a gfx card should really afford you imho...less than that and you're doomed to repeat per process shrink/generation, which isn't for everyone, and is coming upon us within a year). Anything above that, be it overclocked 7870xt (1536sp), 670, 7950, and original 7970 or stock 680, 280x/7970ghz, and 770 would be a good option imho...granted cards in that range on the amd side are typically dramatically overpriced due to mining, and of course nvidia purposely forces the up-sell this gen from a 760 (barely good enough) to overkill at a premium I would say falls out of most 'normal peoples' comfort zone. This is why 270x/280x were good options (either/or before the nvidia cuts or amd price hikes)...cheaper and overclockable to good-enough, or cheaper-than-770 and just plain good-enough. If you can find any of the above between 200-300 (used?), I think you would be doing yourself a favor.

    editted for terrible grammar.
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2013
  10. olo94

    olo94

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    13 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
  11. thebluebumblebee

    thebluebumblebee

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,879 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,419
    Looking forward to the "holy sh*t" post.:laugh:
    ...PACMAN... says thanks.
    25 Million points folded for TPU
  12. ...PACMAN...

    ...PACMAN...

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2012
    Messages:
    277 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    88
    My GTX 760 has been awesome for gaming....I'm at 1080p and it plays everything ULTRA. You may have to use little or no AA on the very demanding games (Crysis 3, Assassins Creed IV etc) but performance has been ultra smooth in every game I have thrown at it and I play alot of different games. Indie/Classics/AAA....the works.

    Be sure to look up Nvidia Inspector which can help you out with adding AA to unsupported titles.

    Any further questions, don't hesitate to ask and enjoy the massive jump in performance you are about to receive lol :)
  13. Magic 65 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2014
    Messages:
    12 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    GTX 760 is too fast for you CPU, you won't get game performance like in reviews...
    Game performance will be less when it might be with faster CPU.
  14. XSI

    XSI

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Messages:
    115 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Location:
    Vilnius. Lithuania
    NO it Isn't.
  15. Magic 65 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2014
    Messages:
    12 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    XSI, game performance of FX-6300 is about Intel i3-3250 Ivy Bridge, depending of game of course...
    But it would be a reason to change CPU+MB...

    Most important to topicstarter is a game performance difference between GT430 and GTX 760. It is like a difference between Challenger Deep and Mount Everest even on FX 6300 CPU.
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2014
  16. Chetkigaming

    Chetkigaming

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    218 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    51
    go for gigabyte wf gtx 760, fast and silent.
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2014
  17. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    An FX-6300 will not bottleneck a GTX 760.
  18. Magic 65 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2014
    Messages:
    12 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Only in a case of playing console game ports.
    In worse case we have performance decrease about 15-20 persent.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page