Tatty_Two
Gone Fishing
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,803 (3.86/day)
- Location
- Worcestershire, UK
Processor | Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK |
Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans |
Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1 |
Video Card(s) | Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC |
Storage | WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS) |
Display(s) | AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular |
Mouse | Coolermaster Storm Octane wired |
Keyboard | Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech |
Software | Win 10 Home x64 |
If you should choose between the 4300 or 6300 which would you take?
The 4300 is 100 euro and the 6300 is 145.
4300 personally, I like the 800FSB and the 9 x multiplier, reviews show that with the right motherboard near to 3.6Gig can be acheived and it is less ram dependant as with a FSB of 800, even at 1:1 with a overclock to 3.6Gig if acheived the ram is going to be in the 800's.
it's just personal preference, I am sure some would say the 6300 but there is little if any performance difference, the 4300 is now becoming cheaper and you are less dependant on a really high end motherboard than you were in the early C2D days as with a 9 x multi you need so much less FSB.