1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7 Makes it Past 4.61 GHz with Water-Cooling

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 14, 2009.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    27,684 (11.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,418
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    In a move that asserts Intel's undisputed leadership over the PC microprocessor market, Intel senior performance analyst François Piednoel conducted a special exhibition at the CES 2009 event, where he demonstrated the Core i7's overclocking and resulting performance potential employing water cooling. The water-cooled Intel Core i7 reached speeds in excess of 4.60 GHz, proving it has better overclocking potential than AMD's Phenom II X4 when water-cooled.

    The setup included an Intel Core i7 sample seated on an Intel "Smackover" DX58SO motherboard. The motherboard was backed by Intel's own desktop control-center software that provides software-level performance management and monitoring. The processor's vCore was set at 1.44V, with the northbridge set at 1.21V. The clock speed of 4.61 GHz was achieved with a bus speed of 144 MHz with a multiplier value of 32x. Temperatures recoded showed the CPU chugging along at 61 °C, with the CPU VRM at 31 °C and the X58 chipset at 41 °C. The feat shows Core i7 to be the better CPU to overclock when water-cooling is used, while an Intel Core i7 is yet to reach 6.2+ GHz speeds, just for the kicks.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: Fudzilla
  2. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    At $1000 it damn well better.........
    CDdude55 and mdm-adph say thanks.
  3. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,919 (7.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Er.. Yay? Aren't people at home hitting higher anyway?
  4. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    27,684 (11.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,418
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Many Thanks to AuDioFreaK39 for sending this in.
  5. kid41212003

    kid41212003

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,581 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    532
    Location:
    California
    They're trying to say that, no one use LN2 or dry ice at home, or using it to run 24/7.

    So, on water, Phenom II vs Core i7, and....

    Well, you know what I mean.
  6. Paulieg

    Paulieg The Mad Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912 (4.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,978
    Location:
    Wherever I can find the iron.
    It's amazing how often WC gets left out of the mix. I do appreciate that Intel thought of more "practical" cooling here. I still don't think i7 is worth the cost though. It's not really the price of the chips either. It's the price of x58 boards that kills it for me. Only 1 motherboard option under $200? Forget it. I'll be sticking with PII.
  7. KieranD

    KieranD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    7,979 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    805
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    water cooling and air cooling are the mainstream forms of cooling so all i take into account is the speed with those

    LN2, dry ice ect is just for record breaking and that cannot be run 24/7 anyway

    i want to see straight i7 vs phenom II on air reviews if anyone knows of any id like to see them

    me im waiting for i5 which is supposed to be the mainstream cpu line
  8. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    There's tons of them. Search PII reviews here, or simply go to any tech website and find their PII review.
  9. SK-1

    SK-1

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,196 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    328
    Amen to that brother. I have crunched dollar vs performance increase and I cant even justify it (yet;)).
  10. Paulieg

    Paulieg The Mad Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,912 (4.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,978
    Location:
    Wherever I can find the iron.
    I haven't ruled out i5 when released though. :)
  11. Exavier

    Exavier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    982 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Location:
    Bath, UK
    I'm hoping I can clock my quad and get used to the DFI bios enough to warrant not needing a change..lol
    also, is that new intel software only i5/7 or will we see a version for 775 chips?
  12. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    896 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    132
    Location:
    Australia
    "The feat shows Core i7 to be the better CPU to overclock when water-cooling is used, while an Intel Core i7 is yet to reach 6.2+ GHz speeds, just for the kicks."

    Ummm what the heck does that mean. Seriously some of those guys at fudzilla should take some english classes.
  13. Laurijan New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,228 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    343
    Location:
    Oulu, Finland
    What CPU-Block do they use in the first pic?
  14. laszlo

    laszlo

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    889 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    66 feet from the ground
    "proving it has better overclocking potential than AMD's Phenom II"

    i don't see the point of all this i7 better than p2;p2 is made to be a c2 alternative and has his position there; maybe the next amd cpu will take the fight but honestly i don't see why ...

    who don't like amd buy intel and viceversa, but we all must thanks amd for the competition and the fight they have (david vs goliat) and prey they remain in business otherwise bye-bye good prices
  15. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,281 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,190
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    At first I thought you were saying a Pentium II :laugh:

    We all know that prices will drop... eventually. I'm currently putting together a WC setup that will still have my old E6600 in it, and eventually an i7, but who knows when.
  16. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,037 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    535
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    Same for me, all the decent boards are in excess of £250 over here, I'm not prepared to pay that much, not when I then have to add at least £100 for RAM, and another £250 for the chip.

    Thing about this article though, it says it was using the desktop control centre thing, so overclocking was done within Windows, but could it actually POST at that speed? If not IMO, this is not impressive.
  17. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,990 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,084
    Sure this is great, if you don't mind your $1000 chip running 61C, at 2% load........


    What a great idea, now someone run F@H or soemthign on it, and burn it out. Intel doens't have much to be scared of other than the voltage intolerance of their new chip, it is highly possible they are still searching for the perfect chip to get to 6Ghz with. Either way, AMD has made a hell of a chip that overclocks better than the competition for less.
    Rebo&Zooty says thanks.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  18. spearman914

    spearman914 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,339 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    Location:
    Brooklyn, New York 11223
    Sad news, i7 tends to run at boiling temps.
  19. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,171 (1.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Too bad that board sucks anyways as it has no SLI support
  20. AsphyxiA

    AsphyxiA New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    632 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    why am i not impressed with this? LOL oh yeah cause its not that impressive. I like intel, but im still not really all that impressed with the i7 series.
  21. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,643 (7.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,969
    Location:
    some AF base
    hmm we will see about this no clock past 4.6ghz on water....:D

    anyone want to see if a ES 945 can break 4.6ghz on H2O?


    bet if i get there it runs cooler too
  22. AsphyxiA

    AsphyxiA New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    632 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    i'd like to see that and i bet it would run cooler. The spokes people who actually overclock seem like that really don't know what they are doing.
  23. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,643 (7.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,969
    Location:
    some AF base
    no kidding i bet this was an all software clock...
  24. kid41212003

    kid41212003

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,581 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    532
    Location:
    California
    4.6GHz at 1.44v is really low voltage. The reason why it so hot is because the x32 multiplier.
  25. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,643 (7.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,969
    Location:
    some AF base
    multiplier makes no difference on heat. that would be voltage and clock


    and its really not that low of voltage on this chip maybe on a C2Q but not a i7

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page