1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Has 14 nm Test Circuits In The Lab, Limited Teaser Info Released

Discussion in 'News' started by qubit, Dec 5, 2011.

  1. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    10,962 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,291
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Nordic Hardware has scored an exclusive interview with Pat Bliemer, Managing Director of Intel Northern Europe to discuss the technology following on from the 22 nm one used in the upcoming Ivy Bridge processors. Unfortunately, Bliemer was light on the technical details of this technology and didn't say when it would see the light of day, except to say that it will make fuller use of the Tri-Gate tech being used in the Ivy Bridge processors and that test circuits are running.
    Back in July, we looked even further ahead and reported that Intel aims to have 10 nm-based processors by 2018 and that the 14 nm tech is due for release around 2014. Watch this space.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    How in the hell are AMD ( or anyone else) going to be able to compete with this?

    lol
     
  3. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    10,962 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,291
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    They're dead in the water. :ohwell:
     
  4. v12dock

    v12dock

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,718 (0.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    412
    The APU
     
  5. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    I don't think APUs can save AMD from this ( I think this is why they're backing out the high end market)

    14nm = potentially packing double he amount of transistors that AMD can in the same amount of space ( based on AMDs 2014 road map)

    3d transistors are much more power effciant they have much lower voltage leak and can because of this can do higher clocks at lower voltage.

    That means over-clocking monsters as heat shouldn't be a problem.*

    * There will still be heat, but there will be far less of it
     
  6. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    10,962 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,291
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Unfortunately for AMD, from the Ivy Bridge generation, the IGP unit is going to be very competitive with theirs in terms of raw 3D performance and DX11 support and will actually make a decent low end "graphics card". No, Intel are totally driving this market in a one horse race.
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2011
  7. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,773 (4.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,030
    Location:
    Florida
    oh man AMD is F#$%d
     
  8. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,275 (2.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    970
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    By not and focusing on Hybrid GPU's that scale well in other ways?
     
  9. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    AMD needs to come up with their own version of a 3d transistors or pay a licensing fee or something to stay in the game, that can kick global foundries up the arse so they can keep at at the NM race.

    That or make a breakthrough in optic computing or graphene chips lol

    With this much of an architectural edge even intels crappy GPU technology would be able to match AMDs if not beat it. ( so intel will be able to beat AMD at their own game)


    No wonder AMD are going mobile :laugh:
     
  10. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,275 (2.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    970
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    HYBRID CPU's!!!!11!~!Q@!!!!


    :cry:
     
  11. Moose

    Moose

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    314 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Location:
    UK
    NC37 and qubit say thanks.
  12. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
  13. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,409 (0.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    287
    :rockout:
     
  14. ayban New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    looking forward to Intel Radeon Graphics or maybe Intel Larabee HD8xxx by 2014.
     
    Completely Bonkers says thanks.
  15. function69 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    60 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Wake me up when it's 2nm
     
  16. SteelSix

    SteelSix

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    230 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    Location:
    Atlanta, USA
    Damn. Almost scary.

    At this pace, Skynet will be online soon.
     
  17. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,345 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    319
    Making a decent GPU isn't all performance. Even if they get something able to match an APU, they do not have mature drivers. It would take total refocusing from Intel for them to turn their GPUs around on every front.

    Plus, I'll believe it when I see it. Intels mindset is to throw enough x86 at it to surpass the weakness. Real GPU cores are much more advanced. Until Intel changes that mindset, it is foolish to think they'll produce a competitive GPU.
     
  18. Damn_Smooth

    Damn_Smooth

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,436 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    478
    Location:
    A frozen turdberg.
    The GPU argument is fun and all, but it doesn't matter when AMD can't produce a CPU powerful enough to push it's graphics. With the 7000 series rumored to be twice as powerful, we have officially passed the point where their CPUs can keep up. I will be running discreet in my main system until they no longer let me. I don't want to speak for anyone else, but I think most of you will be doing the same.
     
  19. EpicShweetness

    EpicShweetness

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    333 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Ft Stewart
    Very true the current line of "high end" CPU's from AMD can not take advantage of all the raw power there GPU's have. However there is one problem. The APU's combination of a decent CPU and GPU is for HTPC or the everyday user, they don't need all the x86 power of an Intel CPU, there CPU's do everyday task's just fine. Plus alot of things out there are being offloaded onto the GPU.
     
  20. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    AMD is in trouble. I'm sure there are one or two decent engineers there... but with a little headhunting and for (relatively) small change, Intel can strike AMD in the heart now by taking out just a few technical engineers and giving them jobs at Intel. Never mind any gardening leave... AMD is listing and it will only take a small nudge to sink it for years.


    PS. This PR is a bit of scare mongering too I think. I doubt Intel will go straight to 14nm. It is two jumps from 22nm. I expect 16nm or 18nm first.
     
  21. Lipton

    Lipton

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    68 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Completely Bonkers says thanks.
  22. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    I wonder if the strategic roadmap and actual practice will follow. There must be some interesting new silicon technology to jump such a large factor 22nm to 14nm. Perhaps technically the lithography is at 14nm but the "spacing" of components will be wider to deal with current leakage etc. I guess we will not know until they launch and we do a transistor count per mm2. 22nm is truly amazing. 14nm is incredible! To think I am still running a 130nm Northwood!
     
  23. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,983 (4.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,149
    Location:
    Pune
    i dont think intel will be able to compare to AMDs IGPs :p
     
  24. Trackr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    265 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    So..

    IB (22nm) - 2012
    Haswell (14nm) - 2014
    Broadwell (10nm) - 2018

    We're going to be stuck with Ivy Bridge for two whole years?

    We're going to be stuck with Haswell for FOUR YEARS?!
     
  25. Lipton

    Lipton

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    68 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    It's not quite that bad. :toast:

    Sandy Bridge (32 nm, 2011) -> Ivy Bridge (22 nm, 2012).
    Haswell (22 nm, 2013) -> Broadwell (14 nm, 2014).
    Skylake (14 nm, 2015) -> Skymont (10 nm, 2016).

    Intel source [PDF]. This, of course, may be subject to change with revised roadmaps.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page