1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Will Counter Barcelona with 1600MHz FSB Xeons

Discussion in 'News' started by DanTheBanjoman, Aug 23, 2007.

  1. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    After hearing nothing about the 1600MHz FSB Xeons for several months VR-Zone tells us they will appear in Q4 this year. There will be 2 quad core Harpertown models at 2.8 and 3 GHz and a single dual core Wolfdale at 3.4 GHz. Additionally the cache is increased by 50% to 3MB per core. The faster FSB and increased cache will raise the bar even higher for Barcelona, however since both CPU's aren't available it is yet to be seen if this will be enough.

    To support these new processors Intel will release the Seaburg chipset, it is not mentioned if the current chipsets will officially support the faster bus.
    For a full list of new Wolfdales and Harpertowns visit VR-Zone.

    Source: VR-Zone
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 23, 2007
    oldcrank says thanks.
  2. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    Is the higher fsb meant to help in the server segment?
     
  3. mandelore

    mandelore New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Location:
    UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
    hmm, dont it make u think, they need this to counter the barcelona chip? :)
     
  4. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    Meh, it doesn't really boost performance speed of the CPU unless you're running into a fsb bottleneck. The only time I can think of that happening is in a multi-server cpu socket solution.
     
  5. mas0n New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Messages:
    88 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Location:
    dallas
    In other news, Intel still uses the old FSB architecture...
     
  6. jocksteeluk

    jocksteeluk New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,457 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th buildi
    even though this is server hardware i am pretty sick of the ever changing hardware specifications of Intel cpu's because i have no doubt that the 1600mhz bus will filter down to the next revision of Intel cpus making yet another batch of general consumer electric items out of date very soon after release. Upgrade-ability and backward compatibility is certainly something Amd should be praised for.
     
  7. mas0n New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Messages:
    88 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Location:
    dallas
    I don't really think either of them should be praised for it. If Intel would hurry up and just integrate the Northbridge into the CPU then these guys could just use the same socket again, remember Socket 7?

    We should be able to drop any recent processor into any recent board, but these bastards have us ditching whole systems to switch sides.
     
  8. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    intel maybe using old FSB architecture,but their still kicking amd's ass.same for the on chip memory controller,i dont think it showed any advantage at all really.
     
  9. Sovereign

    Sovereign New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    797 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Thats just stupid. Thats like a kid saying "Hey! My dad is bigger than your dad!" and then runs off to hide behind him. :wtf:
     
    tigger says thanks.
  10. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,543 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,314
    Leapfrog.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  11. FR@NK

    FR@NK

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    576 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    I really dont see why this would be a problem since Intel's current mid range chipset(P35) can easily do 2000Mhz Bus.

    [​IMG]

    The X38 would most likely hit 2400Mhz easy. The issue I can see is since the bus will be rated higher on these chips, the multi would be set lower which would limit the max overclocking compared to a 1333 or 1066Mhz chip.
     
  12. Grings

    Grings New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    187
    Location:
    Blighty
    it was a disadvantage in the end, as they had to change from 939 to am2, when they had no real improvement other than ddr2 support to warrant a socket change (and lost me as a customer in the process)
     
  13. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Current generation is Intel 5000 series, not P35 or X38. Also, with 2 sockets (and buses) the strain on the northbridge is higher. Besides, 1600MHz settings do exist in current chipsets, the BIOSes simply don't support it. With the official release the code will appear and might be injected into the current BIOSes like they did with the PC-DL.

    This is no news, the roadmap clearly shows that Tigerton will use CSI. CSI will come to lower end platforms as well. Besides,these platforms have a FSB per socket, so it isn't as crippled as Tulsa for example is.
     
  14. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    Intel is no better. Look how many people had to buy a new board for Core 2, despite having a socket 775 board already.
     
  15. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,807 (3.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Agreed Wil E. Also....the integrated memory controller is still a good thing. The DDR2 support wasnt able to be integrated into socket 939s controller from what was stated. Youd have to redevelop the chipset and that would just lead to confusion in the 939 world. It isnt that bad really going from 939 to AM2 (940)
     
  16. msimax

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    69 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
  17. KennyT772

    KennyT772 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,585 (1.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    holy f***ing s***. I thought I was doing good at 8000mb/s
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page