1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Lenovo and Motorola adopting Intel's Atom 'Medfield' SoC

Discussion in 'News' started by Cristian_25H, Jan 11, 2012.

  1. Cristian_25H

    Cristian_25H News Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,626 (4.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,164
    Location:
    Still on the East Side
    After many years of planning, work and investment, Intel is now finally looking ready to step up and challenge ARM in the smartphone space. Yesterday at CES 2012 Intel announced that not one but two major companies - Lenovo and Motorola, will be using its 32 nm Medfield SoC (System-on-chip) for smartphones and tablets coming out later this year.

    Lenovo is set to kick off the Medfield game as soon as Q2 when it will release in China the K800 smartphone running Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich). The K800 is powered by a 1.6 GHz (single-core/dual-threaded) Atom Z2460 chip, and features a 4.5-inch TFT touchscreen, an 8-megapixel rear-facing camera, 802.11 b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth 3.0, and GPS. Lenovo's plans also include a 10-inch Android tablet that's likely also scheduled for a Q2 arrival.

    [​IMG]

    As for Motorola, it entered a 'multi-year, multi-device strategic relationship' with Intel and will introduce Medfield-based, Android-running smartphones and tablets in the second half of 2012. Details are scarce at this time but there will surely be leaks in the coming months.

    Image courtesy of Engadget
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 11, 2012
  2. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,794 (2.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    I invested in INTC with the thought that they would be heading in this direction... and now they have demonstrable results. 22nm tri-gate will give them the edge in the end. :toast:
     
  3. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    785 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    83
    Android support,….check
    4.5-inch TFT touchscreen,….check
    8-megapixel rear-facing camera,….check
    802.11 b/g/n WiFi,….check
    Bluetooth 3.0,….check
    GPS,….check
    1.6 GHz (single-core/dual-threaded) Atom Z2460 chip,…cheeeee,…wait what!?!

    Aren’t ARM devices starting to use quad core processors or in the case of nVidia Kal-El AKA Tegra 3,…5 cores (4 Superman plus one Clark Kent). I’ll bet the iPad 3 will have a quad SoC as well as the next iPhone. Hell even the HP Touchpad running WebOS uses a real dual core ARM SoC (albeit 1.2GHz but they were hitting ~1.4 to ~1.5).

    I don’t know man,…..

    Maybe it can perform well and will have decent battery life but I’m not so sure how good that processor looks on paper. If I’m wrong here that OK, wont be the first time or the last, but many uninitiated gadget buyers will likely be thinking the same thing. Right or wrong in that case doesn’t really matter if no one buys into the platform.
     
  4. dir_d

    dir_d

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    848 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Manteca, Ca
    we dont know how this dual thread chip will run. It could be possible to out shine the tegra 3. Time will tell if its up to the task.
     
  5. joyman

    joyman

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    86 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Using Intel Atom in the last year of the Mayan calendar is fail. We have less than 12 months of life and still they throw at us Atoms... Geez start using molecules already:laugh:
     
  6. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,448 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    you cant really compare arm vs x86 with just clock speed as the two have very diff design in the way they do things. tho quad arm vs single x86 is a different story.

    if there was ever a reason for MS to abondon ARM aupport in windows 8, intel entering the smartphone and tablet market like this would be it. lets hope not.
     
    More than 25k PPD
  7. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,269 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    230
    EXCUSE ME....COMING THROUGH...PARDoN ME...800 pound blue gorillia entering the room here..
     
  8. scoutingwraith

    scoutingwraith

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    726 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    60
    Im interested if they solved the battery saving issue compared to the ARM chips. I think i can recall that they were not as efficient.
     
  9. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,651 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    175
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    LOL. The battery will drain in minutes. Forget hours. I wonder how much intel is paying them to make this pile.
     
  10. iLLz

    iLLz

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    93 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Location:
    West Deptford, NJ
    xBruce88x says thanks.
  11. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,448 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    looks pretty sweet so far. with 22nm i wouldn't be surprised to see dual core 2ghz and a 500mhz gpu.
     
    More than 25k PPD

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page