Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
- Messages
- 18,937 (2.85/day)
- Location
- Piteå
System Name | Black MC in Tokyo |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 5600 |
Motherboard | Asrock B450M-HDV |
Cooling | Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2 |
Memory | 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz |
Video Card(s) | XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319 |
Storage | Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB |
Display(s) | Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p |
Case | Fractal Design Define R4 |
Audio Device(s) | Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850x v3 |
Mouse | Logitech G602 |
Keyboard | Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown |
VR HMD | Acer Mixed Reality Headset |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | Rimworld 4K ready! |
From what i seen of AMD they tend to over state what their products can do. Claim they are faster then they really are. Case in point a recent even AMD claimed their 8350 cpu was comparable to i7 4770k, which if look at benchmarks their 9590 is still slower even though its overclocked ~20%. Been several cases of that kinda stuff over the years as well, So their claim of 45% i wouldn't believe that for a sec til a 3rd party reviewer comes out with results.
For one thing it's cherry picked. Under specific circumstances a 8350 would be as fast an i7. They never speak in general terms. I'm quite confident that %45 number is true, the question is a) circumstances and b) 45% over what exactly?