1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

New GK104 SKU Details Surface

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 5, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,201 (11.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,572
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    We know from a late-March article that NVIDIA is working on two new SKUs based on its GK104 silicon, for launch in May. With the Kepler architecture, particularly with the design of the new-generation Streaming Multiprocessors (SMX), NVIDIA substantially increased CUDA core density. Each SMX holds 192 CUDA cores, and as with the previous-generation Fermi architecture, the SMX count is the only thing NVIDIA can tinker with, to control CUDA core count in new GPUs. GeForce GTX 680's little brother, hence will have 7 out of 8 SMX units enabled, and end up with a CUDA core count of 1344. This leaves easier to configure parameters such as clock speeds, for NVIDIA to design the perfect SKU to capture a price-point. NVIDIA is targeting the sub-$399 market, while somehow maintaining competitiveness with Radeon HD 7950.

    [​IMG]

    Specifications of the new SKU follow.

    GeForce GTX 670 Ti, by the numbers
    • 4 Graphics Processing Cores (GPCs), 7 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMX)
    • 1344 CUDA cores
    • 112 Texture Memory Units (TMUs), 32 Raster Operation Processors (ROPs)
    • 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface
    • Around 900 MHz base core clock, boost clock and feature availability not known
    • Around 1250 MHz (5.00 GHz GDDR5 effective) memory clock, around 160 GB/s memory bandwidth
    • Estimated price US $349-399
    The new report reinforces the May launch time-frame.

    Source: VR-Zone
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
    Delta6326 says thanks.
  2. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,613 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    348
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
    That would make it as fast as a tricycle:p.
  3. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,199 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    Sweet. Hopefully it can OC to match a 680.
  4. hardcore_gamer

    hardcore_gamer

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    378 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Location:
    Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
    This card might take away the power efficiency crown from Pitcairn.
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  5. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,154 (5.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,959
    Location:
    Home
    Gogo competition! The price has stagnated over the past year due to Nvidia's incompetence, now with GK104 things will heat up nicely, hopefully translating to cheaper wares for all:)
  6. Maban

    Maban

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,334 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    979
    Um...math check? I do believe you mean 1250MHz.
    btarunr says thanks.
  7. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,201 (11.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,572
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    Fixed. I relied on Theo's math.
    cadaveca and Maban say thanks.
  8. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,819 (1.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    665
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Nice now this is fitting in to my budget I like!
  9. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    992 (0.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    218
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    Never rely on his math. :laugh:
  10. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,573 (6.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,030
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    god if this thing is around the price of 350-399 and beats the 7950 and obviously the 7870 it will be so much win.
  11. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,124 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    No mention of how much VRAM. Better be 2GB...
  12. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,613 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    348
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
    They mention 256bit so it must have 2gb.
    I really hope they dont cut down the vrms even further.
  13. happita

    happita

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,354 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    392
    They will. If this rest in a real nice spot on the priceboard. AMD will be forced to lower prices if Nvidia takes away customers :D
    Might be the first time I might consider going back to the green side if the price/performance is right :)
  14. illli

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    150 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    funny how the 680 was originally named 670 Ti. if it were not for amd, we would have had the 680 today at the 670 Ti price. too bad for us
  15. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,124 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    Yea, I assumed 2GB, but you never know. Stranger things have happened. If I could get a 670 that performs near or at the level of an HD7950 for $350, I'd take the leap. Not sure if I want to wait and see what comes this fall or jump on GK104 though. The GTX680 did impress me quite a bit, just have to see how it scales down.
  16. hhumas

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2011
    Messages:
    551 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Islamabad
    its for those who can't buy 680 but want to get rid of old cards
  17. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,123 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    God... with all the time Nividia's taking I'd hope so! While you can say in May, by October AMD could have some 8850 that beat that... it's the same thing! This is no longer competition, just you buy what in the market when you need it.

    While here's my question... why not sooner? Face it these are from production GK104 wafers, you mean Nividia doesn't have enough chips from those wafer to start production. I understand the GTX680 as it got changed midstream, but these products have been pretty well canned in terms of design and PCB while they've known what they need to beat 2-3 months back in terms of 7890/7950. So it would appear everything shoulds be ready but we wait again? By May they'll have lost any momentum gain by the GTX680 and without SKu's to buy that waning fast.
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  18. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,334 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    i think im waiting on the half smx modelx4 , whatever that will be
  19. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,495 (13.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,910
    No no, Nvidia is awesome, it doesn't matter what the timetable is. Any card that marginally beats another card is just awesome.
  20. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    If the 670Ti will bring a proportional increase in performance over the 570 as the 680 is over the 580 (let's say 30%) at the same pricepoint as the 570 was launched in 2010 then it's not so bad considering that AMD offers 5% increase (7870/7850) for the same price that you could buy in 2010 cards like 6970/6950.
  21. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    Would there be a sub 200$, 28nm parts from nvidia's side?
  22. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    There will certainly be. But when?
  23. Novaguy New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    16 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    It's 7 SMX units while the 680 has 8 SMX units, so it's probably around that ballpark of 7/8th's the speed of the 680 (plus adjustments for clock speed and bad silicon and memory). My guess is 7/8ths of the 680 but a similar power envelope, but who knows until we get some numbers.
  24. nikko New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    42 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    GK104 is the sub-200$ part but only after it satisfies the needs of early eager adopters and the card is largely unavailable to begin with. I think there should be a 1152 part at GTX570 level of performance just like GTX460 was positioned between 275 and 285, anything below goes to sub 150$ like GTS450.
  25. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,163 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    170
    :):):)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page