- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 47,164 (7.57/day)
- Location
- Hyderabad, India
System Name | RBMK-1000 |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming |
Cooling | DeepCool Gammax L240 V2 |
Memory | 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X |
Video Card(s) | Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock |
Storage | Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB |
Display(s) | BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch |
Case | Corsair Carbide 100R |
Audio Device(s) | ASUS SupremeFX S1220A |
Power Supply | Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W |
Mouse | ASUS ROG Strix Impact |
Keyboard | Gamdias Hermes E2 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
Graphics giant NVIDIA found itself in trouble last year, with the infamous mGPU failure fiasco, that ended up costing the company around $200m over replacement of faulty GeForce mGPUs. The company then assured investors that the money spent on handling the situation would be covered by insurance claims. Now, the insurance provider, National Union Fire Insurance Company (NFUI) of Pittsburgh filed a case against NVIDIA at a California district court, leaving it to decide upon insurance coverage.
The filing reads "Concurrently with, or prior to, placing National Union on notice of the chip claims, NVIDIA has engaged in settlement negotiations with the chip claimants and, on information and belief, has agreed to settlements and/or the material terms of settlements with respect to some or all of the chip claims." The company complains that NVIDIA did not permit NFUI to participate in any of the settlement negotiations with the clients NVIDIA sold the faulty GPUs to. Instead of sharing data relating to the actual settlement negotiations, NVIDIA allegedly "flooded" NFUI with technical data the insurer could make little or no sense of, what it takes as an evasive move to cloak the actual dealings. "[NVIDIA]cloaked its refusals to provide information under the guise of preserving commercial relationships with the chip claimants." In short, the insurer doesn't want to pay up, and wants the court to decide upon the matter.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site
The filing reads "Concurrently with, or prior to, placing National Union on notice of the chip claims, NVIDIA has engaged in settlement negotiations with the chip claimants and, on information and belief, has agreed to settlements and/or the material terms of settlements with respect to some or all of the chip claims." The company complains that NVIDIA did not permit NFUI to participate in any of the settlement negotiations with the clients NVIDIA sold the faulty GPUs to. Instead of sharing data relating to the actual settlement negotiations, NVIDIA allegedly "flooded" NFUI with technical data the insurer could make little or no sense of, what it takes as an evasive move to cloak the actual dealings. "[NVIDIA]cloaked its refusals to provide information under the guise of preserving commercial relationships with the chip claimants." In short, the insurer doesn't want to pay up, and wants the court to decide upon the matter.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site