1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Prepares GeForce 9500, up to 3 times Faster than 8500 GT

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 5, 2008.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,749 (11.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,676
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    NVIDIA is preparing an addition to its GeForce 9 series, the GeForce 9500, slated for a July 29, 2008 launch. This product is positioned at an entry-mid range level, consists of two variants, the GeForce 9500 GDDR3, and a DDR2 model. Early tests prove this graphics processor (GPU) to be close to three times faster than the previous-generation 8500 GT. Unlike the reference 8500, this GPU supports 2-way SLI.

    The nomenclature isn't certain yet. While the GDDR3 variant could be named 9500 GT, it remains to be seen what the DDR2 variant would be named. Provided, are images (in order) of the DDR2 and GDDR3 variants, followed by the specifications sheet.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    With inputs from Hardspell, Images courtesy Tom's Hardware
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2008
  2. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    If nvidia can keep prices low, this 9500GT will be a winner...
     
  3. TheGoat Eater

    TheGoat Eater

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    752 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    126
    Location:
    West Des Moines,IA (USA)
    nice, short, and looks like no extra PCI-E 6pin power needed overall looks like it could be a winner if the performance is there
     
  4. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    I hope its "at least 3 times faster" and not "3 times faster in 3d mark vantage"
     
  5. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,414 (6.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,483
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    Depending on price these could be a worthwhile SLi configuration. Nvidia is kinda competing with itself with this card, referring to the 8800GS/9600GSO.
     
  6. calvary1980

    calvary1980 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,801 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    310
    Location:
    Toronto, CA
    chinese did a review months ago, expreview did one too it isn't that much faster however this card supports the VP3 Engine and Hybrid Power.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    it also has a nifty feature according to expreview that underclocks the GPU to save energy in Idle.

    [​IMG]

    - Christine
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2008
    lemonadesoda and tkpenalty say thanks.
  7. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,063 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,122
    The 8500 supported 2-way SLI. Some cards used software SLI, and others had the connecter, but they did do SLI.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2008
    btarunr says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  8. Swansen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    182 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    confused???

    so wait, if this is suppose to be three times better than the 8500, than it would place it above the current 9600 correct????
     
  9. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,749 (11.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,676
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I didn't know that. Every 8500 I came across, at least the NV reference PCB ones had no SLI finger.
     
  10. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,414 (6.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,483
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    I for one, know they support SLi but as for not having an SLi "finger" and which ones do not, is unsure information here.

    I do know that eVGA's flavor of the 8500GT did/does.
     
  11. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,063 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,122
    Some had the finger, most didn't. The ones without the finger did "software" SLI over the PCI-E bus. Doing it this way didn't really affect performance either since the cards weren't powerful enough to even come close to maxing out the bus.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  12. Swansen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    182 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    .... so know one has any input on my question???
     
  13. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,063 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,122
    Three times the 8500GT performance doesn't make it better than the 9600GT.

    [​IMG]

    The 8500GT relative performance is only 22% of the 9600GT, three times that only puts it at 66%. The 9500GT will probably be just a little better than the 8600GTS.
     
    Swansen says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  14. Swansen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    182 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    awesome, thanks for the graph, on a side note, Nvidia's various nomenclatures lately are so confusing its ridiculous... Nothing follows any real order..
     
  15. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,063 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,122
    It all follows an order, I don't know how you can be confused by it. The only thing that really throws it off is the 9600GSO, it is supposed to be weaker than the 9600GT, but the extra shaders makes it about equal overall.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  16. Swansen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    182 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    did you look at the chart? My problem is this, all the seven series cards were better than previous generations, same with the six series. Since the 8 and nine series came out, nothing really follows an order, there are seven series cards that are a lot better than 8 series cards, and same into the 9 and 8 series. then, there are cards within each nomenclature which don't follow an order. When they came out with the new cores in the 8 series they have lower number cards that were better than higher number cards, so you basically just had to pay attention to what core you were buying, thats all just craziness.
     
  17. calvary1980

    calvary1980 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,801 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    310
    Location:
    Toronto, CA
    I like this card. saves energy, gddr3, vp3, ports are emi shielded and no external power connection = perfect htpc card

    it needs a nice passive heatsink from Asus though :)

    - Christine
     
  18. Swansen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    182 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Yes, my friend had exact same mentality when he was putting together a machine for his uncle's media PC.
     
  19. candle_86 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,916 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    233
    well the reports ive gotten on core config are 32 shaders, 8rops, 8tmu's so this should be right there with the 8600GT unless they suddenly give it a 256bit bus
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page