Radeon Fury to be slower than GTX 980 Ti

Frag_Maniac · Jun 8, 2015

yotano211 said:
My question is, will it make my Prius faster?

No, but it might make RCoon's Viking Raccoon frisky. :twitch:

Anyways, regarding that chart, it's a bit boasty without even mentioning what games were tested. The way a lot of these tit for tat GPU power struggle scenarios have gone is the more closely matched models often have games they excel at, but are beaten in others.

Let's judge the graphics parts by what players see, vs what hit hungry sites claim pre launch.

yotano211 · Jun 8, 2015

Frag Maniac said:
No, but it might make RCoon's Viking Raccoon frisky.

Anyways, regarding that chart, it's a bit boasty without even mentioning what games were tested. The way a lot of these tit for tat GPU power struggle scenarios have gone is the more closely matched models often have games they excel at, but are beaten in others.

Let's judge the graphics parts by what players see, vs what hit hungry sites claim pre launch.

oh man, i was hoping that it could give it more than 110hp.

purecain · Jun 8, 2015

even if fury is a faster card, I may opt for nvidias 980ti... the reason I support amd usually is because I don't want them to go under... the core on the 980ti is amazing though, kidney anyone?????

RCoon · Jun 8, 2015

trodas said:
Well, AMD did not have any excuses to not blow Titan X out of the water with Radeon Fury X card, and they have seriously screw things up, if they did not do it. After all, the performance tests of the slower Fury seems to be more that impressive:

Well, another source show these speed results, that are not much impressive:

http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-390x-nvidia-gtx-980ti-titanx-benchmarks/

So let's hope the real performance will be higher

Also this test shows, that the speed-up over Titan X is consistent thru 21 games (posted already, added the link):

http://wccftech.com/amd-hbm-fury-x-fastest-world/

...so I cannot wait till 16 this month to see the reviews and performance, what AMD set as new standard

I stopped trusting WCCFTech after discovering their writers copy-paste articles from other news sites without citing sources. Most of what they write is utter nonsense anyway. I don't think they've been an original credible source for any leak, it's all just reposts of leak news from elsewhere.

broken pixel · Jun 9, 2015

WTFTech

Frag_Maniac · Jun 9, 2015

purecain said:
even if fury is a faster card, I may opt for nvidias 980ti... the reason I support amd usually is because I don't want them to go under... the core on the 980ti is amazing though, kidney anyone?????

Keep in mind too that even though the 900 series doesn't have NVLink, Maxwell cards WILL get a slight boost once CUDA 6 releases, because they're designed to make use of a virtual software version of NVLink to speed up data between it and the CPU and other GPUs. So we won't really know how the AMD 300s compare to Maxwell cards until then. Plus Nvidia has ShadowPlay, which is miles better than Raptr Game DVR.

Xzibit · Jun 9, 2015

Frag Maniac said:
Keep in mind too that even though the 900 series doesn't have NVLink, Maxwell cards WILL get a slight boost once CUDA 6 releases, because they're designed to make use of a virtual software version of NVLink to speed up data between it and the CPU and other GPUs. So we won't really know how the AMD 300s compare to Maxwell cards until then. Plus Nvidia has ShadowPlay, which is miles better than Raptr Game DVR.

NVLink is an interconnect for HPC systems. PCIe is replaced in favor of a mezzanine form to achive it.

NvidiaNews said:
NVIDIA has designed a module to house GPUs based on the Pascal architecture with NVLink. This new GPU module is one-third the size of the standard PCIe boards used for GPUs today. Connectors at the bottom of the Pascal module enable it to be plugged into the motherboard, improving system design and signal integrity

Frag_Maniac · Jun 9, 2015

Xzibit said:
NVLink is an interconnect for HPC systems. PCIe is replaced in favor of a mezzanine form to achive it.

I've seen people say that, but it's NOT limited to HPC. The only reason people are assuming that is because Nvidia first sold (marketed) it to businesses seeking powerful compute GPUs. Recently they've added that it also helps for SLI, because it also speeds up data flow between GPUs as well.

Keep in mind, Nvidia has been building HPC power into their consumer grade GPUs since Fermi. NVLink is not workstation exclusive. It would be a real travesty to create a feature that effectively has the same end result as unified memory, and not use it for gaming, especially when Dx12's higher draw call capability will compliment it so well.

You have to realize, Nivida corp has big investors that they first pitch new tech to. Their investments are a big part of affording to bring the tech to the consumer market as well. So naturally they're initial presentations will be geared toward them.

Ja.KooLit · Jun 9, 2015

ill be very disappointed if new AMD cards will be slower than 980ti.....

but i will just have to wait for the reviews rather than just rumors

Xzibit · Jun 9, 2015

Frag Maniac said:
I've seen people say that, but it's NOT limited to HPC. The only reason people are assuming that is because Nvidia first sold (marketed) it to businesses seeking powerful compute GPUs. Recently they've added that it also helps for SLI, because it also speeds up data flow between GPUs as well.

Keep in mind, Nvidia has been building HPC power into their consumer grade GPUs since Fermi. NVLink is not workstation exclusive. It would be a real travesty to create a feature that effectively has the same end result as unified memory, and not use it for gaming, especially when DX12's higher draw call capability will compliment it so well.

You have to realize, Nivida corp has big investors that they first pitch new tech to. Their investments are a big part of affording to bring the tech to the consumer market as well. So naturally they're initial presentations will be geared toward them.

What ?

NVLink is HPC exclusive because the system is made to specs for the mezzanine form factor of 2/3/4. Unless Nvidia is planning a major motherboard ecosystem change with AMD & Intel its not happening. The best you can expect is something similar to what AMDs has done with XDMA.

GreiverBlade · Jun 9, 2015

night.fox said:
ill be very disappointed if new AMD cards will be slower than 980ti.....

but i will just have to wait for the reviews rather than just rumors

if it's by a small margin i would not be disappointed ...

and yep! REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW!

Frag_Maniac · Jun 9, 2015

Xzibit said:
NVLink is HPC exclusive because the system is made to specs for the mezzanine form factor of 2/3/4.

Source to prove that it's not for consumer cards?

Why would they be calling it unified memory, planning to implement a software version of it on the Maxwell cards via CUDA 6, and showing charts of NVLink benefits in SLI?

I've seen people claim Pascal will not be a consumer card too, which is also false. At Nvidia's stage demo debuting Pascal, they compared it's estimated power to Maxwell, not workstation specific cards.

And here is their article verifying Pascal will have NVLink.

http://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/nvlink-pascal-stacked-memory-feeding-appetite-big-data/

Here is AnandTech's article showing an Nvidia road map chart indicating the software version of uni mem will be implemented on Maxwell cards.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7515/nvidia-announces-cuda-6-unified-memory-for-cuda

erocker · Jun 9, 2015

I really don't find this rumor to be plausible. I could see the 390x being slower, but not the top Fury card... Actually I don't think the lower-end Fury card will be slower either. I'm kind of expecting (based on what I've read) that there will be three Fury cards. W/C version, air version (slower), and a slightly cut-down pro version.

BorisDG · Jun 9, 2015

Just this:

"Hunting Titans" LOL!

horik · Jun 9, 2015

I wonder when AMD will "leak" some numbers.

BiggieShady · Jun 9, 2015

broken pixel said:
WTFTech

or even ...

WaterClosetCrapFestTech

the54thvoid · Jun 9, 2015

erocker said:
I really don't find this rumor to be plausible. I could see the 390x being slower, but not the top Fury card... Actually I don't think the lower-end Fury card will be slower either. I'm kind of expecting (based on what I've read) that there will be three Fury cards. W/C version, air version (slower), and a slightly cut-down pro version.

390X is rebranded 290X which is far behind 980ti. Its not that it could be slower, it will be.
Fury however, yes, unknown but I don't see it being slower. And it might come bundled with BF Star Wars (Hexus article). Ooooh.

erocker · Jun 9, 2015

I'm not sure it's an apples to apples rebrand. I hope not anyways, hopefully they tweaked the silicon a little bit for some sort of improvement.

uuuaaaaaa · Jun 9, 2015

I will just leave this here...

http://wccftech.com/benchmarks-amds-fiji-gpu-surface-open-cl-compubench-performance-beats-titanx/

v12dock · Jun 9, 2015

All these “leaks“ with numbers all over the place just a bunch of FUD

the54thvoid · Jun 9, 2015

erocker said:
I'm not sure it's an apples to apples rebrand. I hope not anyways, hopefully they tweaked the silicon a little bit for some sort of improvement.

I'm sure it's been tweaked but its 290x origin is a long way behind 980ti perf. I'm ambivalent about the whole 3xx range tbh. Only the Fiji parts interest me on a tech and prospective purchase point.

A lot of AMD peeps have banged on about supporting the underdog, well, I hope they display their loyalty when Fiji arrives and help AMD out by purchasing it. (Not aimed at you erocker).

I might.

arbiter · Jun 9, 2015

trodas said:
Well, AMD did not have any excuses to not blow Titan X out of the water with Radeon Fury X card, and they have seriously screw things up, if they did not do it. After all, the performance tests of the slower Fury seems to be more that impressive:

Well, another source show these speed results, that are not much impressive:

http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-390x-nvidia-gtx-980ti-titanx-benchmarks/

The thing about your "source" is:
"[May 24th 2015] UPDATE : Benchmarks below were confirmed to be fake."
Next time READ your source BS story you post a link for so you don't look like a complete moron Tool.

trodas said:
So let's hope the real performance will be higher

Also this test shows, that the speed-up over Titan X is consistent thru 21 games (posted already, added the link):

http://wccftech.com/amd-hbm-fury-x-fastest-world/

...so I cannot wait till 16 this month to see the reviews and performance, what AMD set as new standard

Might want to read how they came up with those results, Based using scaling how they claim GCN scales. Which they claim it scales 1:1 for every gcn core that is added. So they numbers are based on fixed scaling which isn't how it works. Just cause you take a cpu go from 1 core to 10, doesn't mean it scales to be 10x faster.

#1 We Divide the number of stream processors of Fiji by the number of stream processors of Hawaii, trusting that the performance will scale linearly with each additional SP. Based on the scaling we observed with all other GCN GPUs we found that the performance scales with perfect linearity at 4K.
You can go back back to the R9 290 vs 7870 data as a reference point.

For example the 2560 GCN unit R9 290 was precisely 2.0x faster than the 1280 GCN unit HD 7870. Even though the 290 is clocked slightly below the 7870, so this would account for the architectural improvements that AMD introduced with GCN 1.1 vs GCN 1.0. In this particular exercise around Fiji we do not account for any possible architectural improvements because they’re difficult to quantify.

#2 We then multiply the result by Fiji’s clock speed, which is purported to be 1050Mhz vs 1000Mhz for Hawaii. Which makes Fiji’s clock speed 1.05 that of Hawaii.
Performance = core count x clock speed
= (4096 / 2816) x 1.05
= 1.45 x 1.05
= 1.53
This makes Fiji exactly 53% faster than Hawaii. We then use the data of Hawaii’s average performance in the 21 tested games and multiply it by 1.53. Below is the final result laid out neatly in two bar graphs for your viewing pleasure.

That is HOW they got the numbers, not based on any game testing but expecting it will scale 1 for 1.

HumanSmoke · Jun 9, 2015

uuuaaaaaa said:
I will just leave this here...

http://wccftech.com/benchmarks-amds-fiji-gpu-surface-open-cl-compubench-performance-beats-titanx/

Pretty funny. WTFtech print a sensationalist headline, but conveniently overlook that the Fury scores lower than the mobile 980M and 290X in other tests. I guess they are setting it up for tomorrows scoop headline.

Xzibit · Jun 9, 2015

Frag Maniac said:
Source to prove that it's not for consumer cards?

Why would they be calling it unified memory, planning to implement a software version of it on the Maxwell cards via CUDA 6, and showing charts of NVLink benefits in SLI?

I've seen people claim Pascal will not be a consumer card too, which is also false. At Nvidia's stage demo debuting Pascal, they compared it's estimated power to Maxwell, not workstation specific cards.

And here is their article verifying Pascal will have NVLink.

http://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/nvlink-pascal-stacked-memory-feeding-appetite-big-data/

Here is AnandTech's article showing an Nvidia road map chart indicating the software version of uni mem will be implemented on Maxwell cards.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7515/nvidia-announces-cuda-6-unified-memory-for-cuda

Both articles make no mention of any sort of benefit to SLI or what your implying.

First article explains NVLink.

The interconnect had to change from PCIE to "NVLink" for the addition connections needed.

Pascal is coming to the consumer in PCIE.

We just had Computex 2015. Did you see any of the new motherboards with "NVLink" connectors ?

Frag_Maniac · Jun 9, 2015

One of the links I just showed you talks about Pascal having NVLink AND being compared to Maxwell. How would it make sense that they'd compare Pascal to Maxwell, since they explain it will take NVLink to reach that claimed 10x power?

PC needs uni mem, consoles have had it for a while. It would be stupid to bring this only to workstation cards. And the charts clearly show multi GPU use as per SLI.

Then there's the fact that they've said Maxwell will have the software version of NVLink via Cuda 6. You're implying they'll go from that to leaving consumer Pascal cards without ANY uni mem. Otherwise they'd have said Maxwell AND Pascal will have the Cuda 6 software version of uni mem.

And here's an article that shows NVLink version 1.0 having the GPU connected to CPU via Pci Ex, and using NVLink between GPUs. To carry it further in consumer MBs to use it between GPU and CPU is just a matter of Intel and AMD jumping on board with it. Which seems the obvious next step since Pci Ex bottlenecks exist even in gaming.

http://www.enterprisetech.com/2014/11/18/early-nvlink-tests-show-gpu-speed-burst/

It may take a bit longer to reach it's full potential on the consumer side, but Nvidia ARE making it possible on their end.

I can see Intel jumping on this fairly soon. If they do, AMD will have to follow or sink even deeper financially than they have already. I don't give a crap what they had at Computex 2015, it will be some time before Pascal is released, that's NEXT year bud.

There are MANY levels of NVLink being mentioned from 30Gb/s all the way to 200GB/s. It's conceivable we'll soon see consumer gaming MBs with one of those lower levels of it, just enough to balance data flow.

Nvidia's hardware has been bridging the gap between gaming and HPC for some time, from Fermi, to the Titans, to NVLink. This shouldn't surprise you. It's time to move forward where we need it most, on the platform itself.

System Name	Space Station
Processor	Intel 13700K
Motherboard	ASRock Z790 PG Riptide
Cooling	Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory	Corsair Vengeance 6400 2x16GB @ CL34
Video Card(s)	PNY RTX 4080
Storage	SSDs - Nextorage 4TB, Samsung EVO 970 500GB, Plextor M5Pro 128GB, HDDs - WD Black 6TB, 2x 1TB
Display(s)	LG C3 OLED 42"
Case	Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s)	Yamaha RX-V371
Power Supply	SeaSonic Vertex 1200w Gold
Mouse	Razer Basilisk V3
Keyboard	Bloody B840-LK
Software	Windows 11 Pro 23H2

System Name	MSI GP76
Processor	intel i7 11800h
Cooling	2 laptop fans
Memory	32gb of 3000mhz DDR4
Video Card(s)	Nvidia 3070
Storage	x2 PNY 8tb cs2130 m.2 SSD--16tb of space
Display(s)	17.3" IPS 1920x1080 240Hz
Power Supply	280w laptop power supply
Mouse	Logitech m705
Keyboard	laptop keyboard
Software	lots of movies and Windows 10 with win 7 shell
Benchmark Scores	Good enough for me

System Name	ROG 7900X3d By purecain
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 7900X3D
Motherboard	ASUS Crosshair X670E Hero
Cooling	Noctua NH U12A
Memory	64Gb G.Skill Trident Z5 neo RGB 6400@6000mhz@1.41v
Video Card(s)	Aorus RTX4090 Extreme Waterforce
Storage	990Pro2Tb-1TbSamsung Evo M.2/ 2TbSamsung QVO/ 1TbSamsung Evo780/ 120gbKingston Now
Display(s)	LG 65UN85006LA 65" Smart 4K Ultra HD HDR LED TV
Case	Thermaltake CoreX71 Limited Edition Etched Tempered Glass Door
Audio Device(s)	On board/NIcomplete audio 6
Power Supply	Seasonic FOCUS 1000w 80+
Mouse	M65 RGB Elite
Keyboard	K95 RGB Platinum
Software	Windows11pro
Benchmark Scores	[url=https://valid.x86.fr/gtle1y][img]https://valid.x86.fr/cache/banner/gtle1y-6.png[/img][/url]

System Name	HP Omen 17
Processor	i7 7700HQ
Memory	16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s)	GTX 1060
Storage	Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s)	1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s)	Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply	230W
Mouse	Roccat Kone XTD+
Software	Win 10 Pro

System Name	X99
Processor	5930K @ 4.7GHz @ 1.323v
Motherboard	Rampage V Edition 10
Cooling	EK
Memory	Dominator Platinum 32GB
Video Card(s)	2x Gigabyte xtreme gaming 980ti
Storage	Samsung 950 Pro M.2, 850 Pro & WD320
Display(s)	Tempest X270OC @100Hz
Case	Thermaltake Core P5
Audio Device(s)	On-board
Power Supply	120-G2-1600-X1
Mouse	Mamba 2012
Keyboard	K70
Software	Win10
Benchmark Scores	http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6823139

Radeon Fury to be slower than GTX 980 Ti

Frag_Maniac

yotano211

purecain

RCoon

broken pixel

Frag_Maniac

Xzibit

Frag_Maniac

Ja.KooLit

Xzibit

GreiverBlade

Frag_Maniac

erocker

*

BorisDG

horik

BiggieShady

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator

erocker

*

uuuaaaaaa

v12dock

Block Caption of Rainey Street

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator

arbiter

HumanSmoke

Xzibit

Frag_Maniac

System Name	Gen2
Processor	Ryzen R9 5950X
Motherboard	Asus ROG Crosshair Viii Hero Wifi
Cooling	Lian Li 360 Galahad
Memory	G.Skill Trident Z RGB 64gb @ 3600 Mhz CL14-13-13-24 1T @ 1.45V
Video Card(s)	Sapphire RX 6900 XT Nitro+
Storage	Seagate 520 1TB + Samsung 970 Evo Plus 1TB + lots of HDD's
Display(s)	Samsung Odyssey G7
Case	Lian Li PC-O11D XL White
Audio Device(s)	Onboard
Power Supply	Super Flower Leadex SE Platinum 1000W
Mouse	Xenics Titan GX Air Wireless
Keyboard	Kemove Snowfox 61
Software	Main: Gentoo+Arch + Windows 11
Benchmark Scores	Have tried but can't beat the leaders :)

System Name	main/SFFHTPCARGH!(tm)/Xiaomi Mi TV Stick/Samsung Galaxy S23/Ally
Processor	Ryzen 7 5800X3D/i7-3770/S905X/Snapdragon 8 Gen 2/Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk/HP SFF Q77 Express/uh?/uh?/Asus
Cooling	Enermax ETS-T50 Axe aRGB /basic HP HSF /errr.../oh! liqui..wait, no:sizable vapor chamber/a nice one
Memory	64gb Corsair Vengeance Pro 3600mhz DDR4/8gb DDR3 1600/2gb LPDDR3/8gb LPDDR5x 4200/16gb LPDDR5
Video Card(s)	Hellhound Spectral White RX 7900 XTX 24gb/GT 730/Mali 450MP5/Adreno 740/RDNA3 768 core
Storage	250gb870EVO/500gb860EVO/2tbSandisk/NVMe2tb+1tb/4tbextreme V2/1TB Arion/500gb/8gb/256gb/2tb SN770M
Display(s)	X58222 32" 2880x1620/32"FHDTV/273E3LHSB 27" 1920x1080/6.67"/AMOLED 2X panel FHD+120hz/FHD 120hz
Case	Cougar Panzer Max/Elite 8300 SFF/None/back/back-front Gorilla Glass Victus 2+ UAG Monarch Carbon
Audio Device(s)	Logi Z333/SB Audigy RX/HDMI/HDMI/Dolby Atmos/KZ x HBB PR2/Edifier STAX Spirit S3 & SamsungxAKG beans
Power Supply	Chieftec Proton BDF-1000C /HP 240w/12v 1.5A/4Smart Voltplug PD 30W/Asus USB-C 65W
Mouse	Speedlink Sovos Vertical-Asus ROG Spatha-Logi Ergo M575/Xiaomi XMRM-006/touch/touch
Keyboard	Endorfy Thock 75% <3/none/touch/virtual
VR HMD	Medion Erazer
Software	Win10 64/Win8.1 64/Android TV 8.1/Android 13/Win11 64
Benchmark Scores	bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o

Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard	ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling	EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory	32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s)	Asus RTX 4090
Storage	WD m.2
Display(s)	LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case	Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s)	Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply	FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse	Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard	Tester84
Software	Windows 11

System Name	Black Knight \| White Queen
Processor	Intel Core i9-10940X \| Intel Core i7-5775C
Motherboard	ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore X299G \| ASUS Sabertooth Z97 Mark S (White)
Cooling	Noctua NH-D15 chromax.black \| Xigmatek Dark Knight SD-1283 Night Hawk (White)
Memory	G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 4x8GB DDR4 3600MHz CL16 \| Corsair Vengeance LP 4x4GB DDR3L 1600MHz CL9 (White)
Video Card(s)	ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 OC \| KFA2/Galax GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Hall of Fame Edition
Storage	Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, 980 Pro 1TB, 850 Pro 256GB, 840 Pro 256GB, WD 10TB+ (incl. VelociRaptors)
Display(s)	Dell Alienware AW2721D 240Hz, ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q 170Hz, ASUS PA246Q 60Hz\| Samsung JU7500 48'' TV
Case	Corsair 7000D AIRFLOW (Black) \| NZXT ??? w/ ASUS DRW-24B1ST
Audio Device(s)	ASUS Xonar Essence STX \| Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply	Enermax Revolution 1250W 85+ \| Super Flower Leadex Gold 650W (White)
Mouse	Razer Basilisk Ultimate, Razer Naga Trinity \| Razer Mamba 16000
Keyboard	Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 (Orange switch) \| Razer Ornata Chroma
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64bit

Processor	X5650 @3,7 Ghz
Motherboard	Gigabyte Ga-EX58-UD5
Cooling	Cogage True Spirit
Memory	2x8 GB Kingston HyperX Fury 1866 CL10
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 1070
Storage	250Gb MX100 SSD+1TB WD Green
Display(s)	QNIX QX2710 2560x1440 27" PLS 96Hz
Case	NZXT Tempest
Power Supply	Corsair RM750 750w 80 Plus Gold Modular
Keyboard	Logitech K120
Software	Win 10 Home 64 bits

System Name	Windows 10 64-bit Core i7 6700
Processor	Intel Core i7 6700
Motherboard	Asus Z170M-PLUS
Cooling	Corsair AIO
Memory	2 x 8 GB Kingston DDR4 2666
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage	Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB, Seagate Baracuda 1 TB
Display(s)	Dell P2414H
Case	Corsair Carbide Air 540
Audio Device(s)	Realtek HD Audio
Power Supply	Corsair TX v2 650W
Mouse	Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard	CM Storm Quickfire Pro, Cherry MX Reds
Software	MS Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

Processor	Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard	MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling	be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory	32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s)	Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage	Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s)	LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case	Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s)	On Board
Power Supply	be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software	W10

System Name	No name / Purple Haze
Processor	Phenom II 1100T @ 3.8Ghz / Pentium 4 3.4 EE Gallatin @ 3.825Ghz
Motherboard	MSI 970 Gaming/ Abit IC7-MAX3
Cooling	CM Hyper 212X / Scythe Andy Samurai Master (CPU) - Modded Ati Silencer 5 rev. 2 (GPU)
Memory	8GB GEIL GB38GB2133C10ADC + 8GB G.Skill F3-14900CL9-4GBXL / 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC4000
Video Card(s)	Asus R9 Fury X Strix (4096 SP's/1050 Mhz)/ PowerColor X850XT PE @ (600/1230) AGP + (HD3850 AGP)
Storage	Samsung 250 GB / WD Caviar 160GB
Display(s)	Benq XL2411T
Audio Device(s)	motherboard / Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro + Front panel
Power Supply	Tagan BZ 900W / Corsair HX620w
Mouse	Zowie AM
Keyboard	Qpad MK-50
Software	Windows 7 Pro 64Bit / Windows XP
Benchmark Scores	64CU Fury: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11269229 / X850XT PE http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5532432

Processor	i7-13700k
Motherboard	Asus Tuf Gaming z790-plus
Cooling	Coolermaster Hyper 212 RGB
Memory	Corsair Vengeance RGB 32GB DDR5 7000mhz
Video Card(s)	Asus Dual Geforce RTX 4070 Super ( 2800mhz @ 1.0volt, ~60mhz overlock -.1volts. 180-190watt draw)
Storage	1x Samsung 980 Pro PCIe4 NVme, 2x Samsung 1tb 850evo SSD, 3x WD drives, 2 seagate
Display(s)	Acer Predator XB273u 27inch IPS G-Sync 165hz
Power Supply	Corsair RMx Series RM850x (OCZ Z series PSU retired after 13 years of service)
Mouse	Logitech G502 hero
Keyboard	Logitech G710+

System Name	MoneySink
Processor	2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard	P8Z77-V
Cooling	AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory	16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s)	GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage	Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s)	Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case	NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s)	onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply	Seasonic X-1050
Software	Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores	3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.