wolf
Performance Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 7, 2007
- Messages
- 7,786 (1.25/day)
System Name | MightyX |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5800X3D |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi |
Cooling | Scythe Fuma 2 |
Memory | 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16 |
Video Card(s) | Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded |
Storage | WD Black SN850X 2TB |
Display(s) | LG 42C2 4K OLED |
Case | Coolermaster NR200P |
Audio Device(s) | LG SN5Y / Focal Clear |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 Platinum |
Mouse | Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE |
Keyboard | Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding |
VR HMD | Meta Quest 3 |
Software | case populated with Artic P12's |
Benchmark Scores | 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss |
ok so as per the title i want a consensus from members on some particular OC numbers from some cards in the GT200 series, exactly 3 questions to be precise.
1. What clock speeds does a GTX 260 core 216 need to attain GTX 280 actual performance
2. What clock speeds does a GTX 260 core 192 need to attain GTX 280 actual performance.
I do realize that some situations the physical (ie framebuffer) difference will prohibit attaining 280 performance, but on the whole (1920x1200 and below) i know 280 actual performance is possible.
My thoughts on those 2 clock frequencies are about the same with a varying shader clock only. my guesses are.
GTX260 core216 - core: 684mhz - shader: 1436 mhz - Memory: 2430mhz
GTX260 core192 - core: 684mhz - shader: 1620 mhz - Memory: 2430mhz
3. what clocks on a 295 to get GTX280 SLi actual performance.
My guess is,
core: 684mhz - shader: 1296 mhz - Memory: 2430mhz
All of these numbers are based on the theoretical peak specs of all cards, like core clock X rops gets you pixel fillrate, calculating mem bandwith and finally shader compute power.
I have found interestingly that at the aforementioned guess speeds, the GTX260 + 295 cards i have tested equal their rivals or surpass them due to a clock speed advantage.
i realize if you overclock the 280 (SLi) they will naturally win out but its an interesting question.
thoughts?
1. What clock speeds does a GTX 260 core 216 need to attain GTX 280 actual performance
2. What clock speeds does a GTX 260 core 192 need to attain GTX 280 actual performance.
I do realize that some situations the physical (ie framebuffer) difference will prohibit attaining 280 performance, but on the whole (1920x1200 and below) i know 280 actual performance is possible.
My thoughts on those 2 clock frequencies are about the same with a varying shader clock only. my guesses are.
GTX260 core216 - core: 684mhz - shader: 1436 mhz - Memory: 2430mhz
GTX260 core192 - core: 684mhz - shader: 1620 mhz - Memory: 2430mhz
3. what clocks on a 295 to get GTX280 SLi actual performance.
My guess is,
core: 684mhz - shader: 1296 mhz - Memory: 2430mhz
All of these numbers are based on the theoretical peak specs of all cards, like core clock X rops gets you pixel fillrate, calculating mem bandwith and finally shader compute power.
I have found interestingly that at the aforementioned guess speeds, the GTX260 + 295 cards i have tested equal their rivals or surpass them due to a clock speed advantage.
i realize if you overclock the 280 (SLi) they will naturally win out but its an interesting question.
thoughts?