1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Thunderbolt To Become Standard for PC in 2013, Optical at That

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 16, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,669
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Towards the end of 2012, Intel will alter Thunderbolt specification from a copper wire-based interconnect to a fiber-optic or photonic interconnect. An analysis by DigiTimes which takes into account information by industry sources, states that Thunderbolt will become standard for PCs only in 2013, and that too the optical one. This comes even as copper wire-based Thunderbolt is beginning to feature on some high-end socket LGA1155 motherboards based on Intel 7-series chipset.

    Thunderbolt will get its big push in 2013, when the port will be standard on mainstream desktops and notebooks by OEM majors such as Lenovo, and several PC motherboard vendors, such as ASUS. The optical Thunderbolt IO, apart from allowing greater cable-lengths than 6 m (a limitation of copper-wire Thunderbolt), could push bandwidth greater than 10 Gbps, as a possible incentive for the industry to facilitate the transition to the optical variant.

    [​IMG]

    Source: DigiTimes
     
  2. R_1

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    449 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    That Thunderbolt is provided by additional ASIC, not incorporated in the chipset. The basic problem with Thunderbolt implementation is it's price - $25 per chip. Intel is the sole provider of the Thunderbolt controller. It is not licensed to anyone. :) What I've heard about additional features is that mobo vendor tend to like them , when their price is $1-$3, $5 max. Thunderbolt is much pricey than $5, so nobody likes it. It is that simple. :)
     
  3. Dos101

    Dos101

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Messages:
    565 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    That, and Thunderbolt peripherals are so sparse right now and crazy expensive. Heck, there aren't even any Thunderbolt docks out yet afaik (I'd like to have Gigabit Ethernet for my Macbook Air).

    Seems like AMD users aren't going to have the luxury of Thunderbolt unless mobo manufacturers incorporate it, at a premium of course due to the reasons that R_1 stated, or they get an add-in card to add that functionality.
     
  4. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,680
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Yeah, I think 2013 is overly optimistic. Yes, it is cost prohibitive but it is also USB prohibitive. Everything the every-man owns is USB so you're talking a large expense to convert all those items to Thunderbolt ports. And then you have the explosion of smartphones and their manufacturers finally agreeing to use a standardized micro-USB for charging and data exchange--something they aren't likely to change again. I doubt Thunderbolt will become standard until at least 2015 and even then, there will be a ton of USB devices.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. rpsgc

    rpsgc

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    696 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    133
    Location:
    Portugal
    Why do we need this again?



    Also, "Firewire".
     
  6. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    769 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Perhaps the hardware implementation costs is part of what lead to Apple being able to introduce Intel Thunderbolt (Light Peak) on their hardware. Many PC manufacturers or motherboard manufactures may not have been interested at the initial introductory cost. Apple may have been willing if it were coupled with an exclusivity deal (for a limited time).

    Who knows, but its clear that even Thunderbolts release on LGA1155 hardware will be limited to the higher-end of the spectrum. So clearly its not cheap. This quasi exclusive nature may attribute to retarding its growth in the market. This could keep peripherals limited in number and relatively expensive,…unlike USB.

    As for AMD, apparently AMD is working something they call “Lightning Bolt”,….the poor mans Thunderbolt:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5413/amds-lightning-bolt-low-cost-thunderbolt-alternative-for-usb-30dp
     
  7. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,680
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Apple likely heard about Thunderbolt and demanded they have access to it on their hardware. Apple has always adapted non-industry-standard ports for their products (hell if I know why). Intel pushed it out the door as a copper product for Apple because optical wasn't ready.

    Lightning Bolt is not optical and basically just extends the DisplayPort packet structure.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,379 (11.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,683
    thunderbolt will be fantastic for addons to laptops, netbooks, and ultrabooks.
     
  9. v12dock

    v12dock

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,591 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    319
    So now my USB3.0 is trivial thanks Intel...
     
  10. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,680
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Naw, USB 3.0 is gonna thrive because of its backwards compatibility with 2.0 and 1.1 (devices o'plenty). USB 4.0 is trivial and that's fine by me. As demonstrated with Super Speed connectors, USB wasn't intended to be expanded in this way. 4.0 connectors would probably have more in common with Frankenstein than USB 2.0. USB also has severe length limitations due to its copper wiring. Intel is going to use Thunderbolt to make sure 4.0 never happens. If Intel were in complete control of USB, they wouldn't have allowed 3.0 to happen.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,621 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Thunderbolt is a nonsensical name. Congrats, intel haha.

    Lightningbolt at least makes sense.
     
  12. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,379 (11.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,683
    sure, except that its a word already in use so they couldn't trademark it easily.
     
  13. DarthCyclonis New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    69 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    From what I understand Apple helped Intel develop it.
     
  14. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,621 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    but did AMD get it 1st or was intel just trying to sound cool :p? *shrugs*
     
  15. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,680
    Location:
    IA, USA
    They did not. Apple basically set the technical requirements they wanted met (like using a mini DP connector) and likely funded the research. Intel did all the heavy lifting on a stipulation that the first Thunderbolt products would be Apple computers. Intel aquired the name "Thunderbolt" from Apple through the deal.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. v12dock

    v12dock

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,591 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    319
    Fiber cables I feel like I will be breaking these left and right
     
    NC37 says thanks.
  17. nt300

    nt300

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    868 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Toronto, ON. Canada
    Intel need to make sure Thunderbolt is cost effective in order for it to succeed. USB4.0 is just around the corner with approx: specs at 15.2Gbit/s (1900 MB/s) and will have backward compatability with USB 2.0 and 3.0 but not 1.0.
     
  18. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,197 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Wake me when a device is made for this that I'll actually care about...

    Got a feeling TB is gonna turn into the Bluray of cabling. With USB3 and then 4 coming...I'm sure TB will have it's place but I don't expect it to become anything more than Firewire was. The major standards like USB will still dominate for awhile.
     
  19. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,680
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Thunderbolt will almost instantly replace USB for all long-distance cable runs. I think it will coexist with USB until Thunderbolt becomes cheaper (kind of like IEEE1394).
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,764 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    If they can make this SuperFast Optical Cable become the next standard (The only cable you'll ever need), then I am all for it. The price just has to come down.
     
  21. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,379 (11.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,683
    i just think its going to be a huge win in the portable market. this really opens up the 'dock' market - dock your tablet and bam, HDMI, DP, gigabit ethernet, USB ports, etc.
     
  22. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,680
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I think that's a little too optimistic. Putting graphics on a shared bus with NICs, keyboards, mice, external drives, and everything else is destined to create problems of its own (namely bandwidth issues). I think it will be a long time before any interface achieves that kind of bandwidth.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,379 (11.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,683
    thats the whole point, and why it uses displayport connectors. video is the only really high bandwidth application, and HDMI 1.4 already includes 100Mb ethernet.
     
  24. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (4.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,616
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    Fiber is the next logical progression of data transfer to/from the PC.
    I would think that good QOS prioritization would eliminate a lot of issues with devices becoming starved for bandwidth (if it's even needed).
     
  25. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,798 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,680
    Location:
    IA, USA
    The push for 10 gigabit ethernet has already begun. That, by itself, can overflow current Thunderbolt specifications, not to mention the issues of interfacing with established networks. Add in a 900 MB/s external SSD and you're already well into no-man's land of interfaces. Right now, if they smoosh them all into one port, there will be major drawbacks. Optical Thunderbolt also won't supply power initially.

    The Thunderbolt implementation in Apple products likely used mini-DP connectors because it's cheap (and Apple probably demanded it). The mini-DP connectors are not likely to work for the optical implementation without substantially increasing the price of the cables.


    Video cards, NICs, etc. all share the PCI Express bus. If you are aiming to combine their outputs, you need a separate bus for that. No PC hardware available now is intended to do that. As far as I know, PCI Express bus isn't even capable of those changes without a serious overhaul.


    I'm not saying it couldn't be done with smartphones and other low bandwidth devices but it is extremely unlikely to happen any time soon with laptops, desktops, workstations, nor servers.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page