1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

UNIGINE-Valley BENCHMARK scores

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by purecain, May 8, 2013.

  1. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,951 (13.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,378
    Quality should be on "Ultra" as well.
     
  2. Wrigleyvillain

    Wrigleyvillain PTFO or GTFO

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,676 (2.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,776
    Location:
    Chicago
    Oops will rerun in a bit and edit the post with new result. I should have looked at the OP closer...

    Edit: Done
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2013
  3. GamerGuy

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2012
    Messages:
    183 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Babylon 5
    That's what I'd said, Heaven has less emphasis on CPU than, say, this Valley benchmark.....which is similar to 3DMark where a good CPU OC separates the men from the boys. Metro 2033 is a better GPU benchmark in that a lot of stress is put on the GPU(s) especially when totally maxed out @1080P, Very High Specs, 4xMSAA + DoF (disable PhysX for a more even comparison between AMD and NV cards).
     
  4. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,566 (3.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,677
    CPU@ 4.4
    GPU@ stock (Single 7970)
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    CPU@ 4.4
    GPU@ stock (crossfire)
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Over clocked the GPU's to 1100MHz:
    CPU@ 4.4
    GPU's@ 1100
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Nice to see that Metal's Titan beat my two 7970's:toast:
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,593 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    529
    Location:
    Australia
    Metro 2033 does like alot of GPU thats for sure but i think it like alot of CPU as well. My FPS in Metro 2033 almost doubled going from my Phenom II 965 to my FX8350, it just loved the 8cores.

    Does the benchmarks "have" to be in 1080 before he records them?
     
  6. The Von Matrices

    The Von Matrices

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,394 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    476
    My cards were at 1150MHz core and 6.4Ghz memory when I ran the tests, in case you want to update the OP.
     
    purecain says thanks.
  7. MetalRacer

    MetalRacer

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    871 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    714
    Location:
    The Lone Star State
    CPU 5.0
    GPU 1136/6768

    [​IMG]
     
    purecain says thanks.
  8. purecain

    purecain

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    639 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    166
    nice score there MetalRacer...

    if everyone uses different settings, then the scores will vary too much. please use 1920x1080 as

    this is the most popular res... im sorry if this is not possible.

    also I prefer 1920x1200 but unfortunately the panel makers have been selling tv res screens to

    pc monitor manufacturers saturating the market with this nasty res...

    but we have to use the most popular unfortunately for this bench to be of any use...

    I chose this bench because unlike heaven, it looks cool and has better music...

    personally I couldn't bare to watch another run of heaven benchmark....

    thankyou to everyone that's posted so far...

    your helping to support the pc community...
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2013
  9. puma99dk|

    puma99dk|

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,481 (1.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    790
    thx purecain to put me on the list, but u may need to point out my GTX670 is 4gb version not 2gb bcs unfortunately, the 4gb ain't that good of a clocker or my card ain't :(
     
    purecain says thanks.
  10. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,562 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    954
    We all only get listed once right? Might as well add my 4.9 ghz run, and it would probably help if everybody listed their cpu speed since it is relevant.
     
    purecain says thanks.
  11. D007

    D007

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,291 (1.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    455
    Location:
    Pompano beach, Florida
    I posted my results on page 2 but I am not on the list yet. XD
    I should be 3rd place I think. :p
     
    purecain says thanks.
  12. Mydog

    Mydog

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    488 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    606
    purecain says thanks.
  13. Spider-Vice

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2013
    Messages:
    24 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Portugal
    Well, I just noticed that I made the test on 8xAA when the requirement was 4x AA :p Here's my rectified score, same specs: Q6600 @ 3.0 Ghz and HD6870 @ Stock. Plus I can't do 1080p, no monitor for that.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. purecain

    purecain

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    639 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    166
    Mydog:slap: read the rules... I just changed your score only to realise you cheated by turning off tessellation... right everybody round to Mydogs place... i'll bring the rope... itsa linchin time.....lol

    please run your card at those same overclocked settings but with tessellation.
    thankyou...:pimp:

    BTW... this is what I used to like about x s... we'd have little bench threads popping up but that site has gone way down hill...

    I appreciate Wiz's work and everyone else that helps keep the forum going so this is me giving something back...
     
    Last edited: May 17, 2013
  15. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,472 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,690
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    I just tried a cpu run at 4.4GHz as well. GPU at 1176 (occasional drops to 1163) core and memory at 6772 - scored 92.8fps average. Gives abetter idea an oc'd titan probably doesn't beat two oc'd 7970's when the cpu's are matched. ;)
     
    HammerON says thanks.
  16. Mydog

    Mydog

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    488 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    606
    My bad :shadedshu

    Here's the run with Tesselation, not much difference :toast:

    Same speed on CPU and GPU's
    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    purecain says thanks.
  17. purecain

    purecain

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    639 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    166
    Brilliant run....
     
    Mydog says thanks.
  18. khemist

    khemist

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    198 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    452
    Location:
    Scotland, UK
    [​IMG]

    2500K @ 5.0 GTX Titan @ 1163/7406

    Was running at 1215 core on this benchmark up until now... need to investigate.
     
    Last edited: May 15, 2013
  19. Mydog

    Mydog

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    488 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Great score :toast:
    Why does it only show 4GB memory on the Titans, should it not be 6GB?
     
  20. khemist

    khemist

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    198 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    452
    Location:
    Scotland, UK
    Must be buggy like the wrong core speeds it gives also.
     
    Last edited: May 15, 2013
  21. Fatal

    Fatal

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    732 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Location:
    Golden, Colorado
    880/1375
     

    Attached Files:

  22. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Titan such a beast, gonna post SLI score later.

    1215core/+500mem

    [​IMG]
     
  23. Knight091

    Knight091

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    446 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    Jacksonville FL
    I will Run the test and see were I stand.
     
  24. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,472 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,690
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    All very interesting..
    Titan scores:
    92.8 fps @ 1163/1176 core 6800 memory (me)
    96.9 fps @ 1163 core 7406 :eek: memory (khemist)
    99.8 fps @ 1215 core 7000 memory (Radrok)
    101.6 fps @ 1190 core 6908 memory (Metal Racer)

    Albeit with the 101 fps with a 5GHz cpu as well. Come on Radrok, get your cpu clocks up. Or it seems you're losing out to the masterful tricks of the benching whore hero that is Metal Racer :cool:
     
    purecain says thanks.
  25. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Yes you are right, I'll rebench single tomorrow :p

    Can do +800 mem stable, should give us a nice score ;)

    CPU was 4,7 GHz HT on
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)

Share This Page