1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Xbox Durango Packs 16-core PowerPC CPU

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 11, 2012.

  1. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,340 (6.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,112
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    RISC CPU cores tend to be smaller than CISC's. Depending on when this CPU could come out, I could be on a smaller process that could cram a lot of processing power in a CPU. Not to say that a console needs this, but I don't see it being unreasonable. MS isn't saying this is coming out this year. I could easily see this in 2-3 years from now.
     
  2. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,276 (11.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,560
    thats a fair point actually, and not something i'd considered. for all we know they'll up the power of the GPU as well (crossfire? beefier model) before it comes out as well.
     
  3. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (4.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,616
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    Maybe IBM's new optochip technology is a lot closer to prime time than we know.
     
  4. visz963 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    5 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    But can it play Crysis?
     
  5. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,596 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,519
    Location:
    IA, USA
    As I said in the other thread, how do we know these are 16 virtual cores like Xbox 360's 6 virtual cores? That would imply it has 8 physical cores with SMP. Considering Xbox 360 had 3 physical cores with SMP 7 years ago, that isn't unlikely. Even 16 physical cores with SMP doesn't sound unreasonable because we're talking Power PC RISC processors, not x86 CISC processors.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. arunmcops New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
  7. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,936 (2.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,211
    The proletariat does not need more cores.
     
  8. Ferrum Master

    Ferrum Master

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    670 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    150
    Location:
    Rīga
    Bullshit... it is a quad core with 4 threads on each core... I suspect a weak performer...

    Slide
     
  9. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,176 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    thanks god, i hate consoles but that's mean new improvement in games graphics for PC.
    no more crappy engine to force games run smooth on consoles.
     
    NHKS says thanks.
  10. Katanai

    Katanai

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    953 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    112
    No! It's gonna have forty cores, no wait, make that fifty. Why, you ask? Because I dreamed that last night just like the original source of this "article".
     
  11. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,414 (7.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,483
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    So, in reality, it's LIKE Bulldozer/Piledriver .....

    Just a quick glance at the slide.
     
  12. NinkobEi

    NinkobEi

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,045 (0.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Well the 16core cpu is likely not the quality of an intel one. If each core is as powerful as AMD's ol socket 939 cpus then that sounds about right
     
  13. faramir New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Messages:
    203 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    That's because it 99.99% is (too good to be true that is); it's mostlikely a 16 thread CPU, with 4 physical cores.
     
    devguy says thanks.
  14. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,116 (2.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    917
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
  15. Yellow&Nerdy?

    Yellow&Nerdy?

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    374 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    It is 16 cores, but not 16 conventional x86-x64 cores. I bet that the performance won't be that far away from "Orbis", which has a conventional quad-core.
     
  16. ZoneDymo

    ZoneDymo

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    391 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    60
    Bull to the shit, that is all.
     
  17. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,035 (7.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,589
    Yes. Thats exactly what this means.
     
    theoneandonlymrk and Grings say thanks.
  18. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,827 (1.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    HAHAHAHAHA Thats funny they think they are going to put a 16 core Proc in a Box that is around 12" x 10"(just a guess) when SERVERS are starting to make a bigger move to 16Cores+ and can cost well over $600+...

    Now if they meant to say 16 threads then this is a different story.
     
  19. Patriot

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    182 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    Facepalm...
    one more time "It is 16 cores, but not 16 conventional x86-x64 cores. "
    No...no it is not. 4 cores with 4 threads per core is not a 16 core cpu.
    It is a quad core with 16 threads.
    http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/6506/surferibm05s021512.jpg

    Rather interesting that IBM is making it at GF though... guess that is due to the GCN gfx part.

    AMD made their first "fusion" with IBM in the Xbox 360...I wonder what they will gain from this venture.
     
  20. Grings

    Grings New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Location:
    Blighty
    Interesting that that slide shows a 'Blu Ray 3D hardware decoder'

    Guess it will have a Blu Ray drive after all
     
  21. Patriot

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    182 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    meant or not...it the source says 4c/16t
     
  22. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,151 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    913
    That is like comparing apples to oranges! Bulldozer is a desktop CPU, developers don't optimised most PC games.

    Console hardware dates quickly so developers are forced and encouraged to utilise the hardware, thus making your point invalid.
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2012
  23. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    And it will still be an underpowered lump of garbage.
     
  24. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,405 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    568
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Im finding the shared with gfx 80mb edram interesting, its allmost sounding like a conflab between Amd and Ibm , and im half thinking that if this isnt made SOC ,its being designed to become SOC at a later point

    just with the blu ray decode mentioned plus the shared memory it almost sounds like they maybe putting the cores and gpu in the same silicon, which is quite doable since these arent 16 cores just 4 overprovisioned(ALA BD PD) plus a gpu element would fit ,hang on that config has a name:D

    all just ramblings and speculation obv:)
     
    5 Million points folded for TPU
  25. ZoneDymo

    ZoneDymo

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    391 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    60
    You know there is more then "gaming" right?
    NC37 comment still stands, you are the one who has no point.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page