• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

i7 6700 non-k
cpu-z.png
 
Think I have an sempron 145 somewhere, but I'm too lazy to look after it and I don't have any spare ddr2/ddr3 for it.

cpuz sempron 145 data and bench.jpg


took me "only" a couple of months :D. gonna be used in my Linux pc to compile stuff :))

it failed to unlock from the start (it goes past the bios screen but it fails to load vista or newer (it boots in win xp but fails prime95 on second core really fast) and linux gets a kernel panic, the funny part is that it can pass memtest no matter how long i let it run, something regarding the core that is disabled is clearly broken no clue what; it doesn't matter the voltage i push in it second core (even tried 1.65V without luck)is still not stable)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does your 4790K need 1.36 for the Core voltage @ 4.6 GHz? Seems excessive on a Haswell chip.

It's an auto overclock done with the Gigabyte Z97's BIOS. It's stable and runs pretty cool.
 
It's an auto overclock done with the Gigabyte Z97's BIOS. It's stable and runs pretty cool.
That amount of voltage would get me 4.9 GHz but if it's working out for you then never mind.
 
Does your 4790K need 1.36 for the Core voltage @ 4.6 GHz? Seems excessive on a Haswell chip.
My i5-4670k needs 1.35V to reach 4.4 GHz :mad:
 
Close any monitoring apps that u may have running in the background like fraps, hwinfo, cputemp and try again.
Sorry for such lately relay after a few months. Yes you're right the FRAPS was the main issue that bothering my scores,here's the real scores:
cpuname.png
CPUScore.png
ram.png

Overclocked to 4GHz :)
By the way,thanks.
 
^^good score^^
 
Based on this, it was worth the money.

ss+(2016-10-05+at+03.37.50).png


My best setup / achievement so far!
 
I can show you a stock 3770k.
 
@CAPSLOCKSTUCK That is interesting, and thanks!

I feel like my vcore is a little bit overkill, but that must be due to the Base Clock and the GHz itself.

Otherwise why not 200MHz? Would it be that having a lower base clock be more beneficial hence why they are often seen lower with vcore while the multiplier is maxed like in your results? Or is it just a solution for enabling turbo and while the CPU occurs to be boosted to the 4.6GHz? I am quite intrigued, never really thought of that solution before, my focus was mainly to max out the ram speed.

Plus, is LLC enabled? If I may recall properly, I was able to achieve 4.4GHz in a similar range of vcore, but needed LLC enabled, otherwise the vdrop would demand me to set the vcore extremely high during load.
 
Great thread, spent a good 15 minutes laughing at the competition to show off the smallest and most ineffectual bench. This is a bit better than single digit scores but not much.

6b8OHZU.jpg
oIyyVZQ.jpg
c49tkuy.png
 
I7 920 results coming right up stock aswell as oc.

Stock as a rock. Not so powerful any more, but its reliable power even after all these years.

CPU-z%20bench%20stock.jpg


4 GHz daily 24/7 running

CPU-z%20bench%204%20GHz.jpg


Hold your horses for now its going fast or as fast as a nearly 8 year chip can do it at 4.4 GHz.

cpu-z%20bench%204,4%20GHz.jpg
 
Rubbish Pegatron board running.

Clipboard01.png
 
I have two! CPU I use in my "gaming" PC:
cpuz1.png
cpuz2.png


And then I have this gem in my "retro gaming" PC :D
cpuz1sempron.JPG
cpuz2sempron.JPG
 
Back
Top