Ryzen 3000 listed online early on russian site.

[Vya Domus]

The bigger the chip (or the more cores that are enabled) the lesser that chances that it'll clock higher. Chances are those 12 core CPUs (6+6) or 4+4 will clock higher on average than anything else , including TR and EPYC.

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

Hmm these looks to be 100% the same as AdoredTV’s speculations. Coincidence?

No, he was right, his lead was right too.
He has been before.

 

[R0H1T]

Are we still talking about single core turbo? If so then I don't see why bigger (better) chips can't have higher single core turbo? We've seen the same with 8086k or 9900k in MSDT lineup from Intel, there was also the 5GHz chilled Xeon demo. Bigger chips not only give the TDP headroom, but also the thermal headroom for max core clock on a single core. Again, assuming they're better bins than the rest of the lineup.

 

[cucker tarlson]

the 3600x and 3700x,what is the ccx configuration of those ? is it 1x8 on 3600x and 2x 6 on 3700x or 2x4/3x4 ?

 

[TheLostSwede]

No, he was right, his lead was right too.
He has been before.

If you read his comments over at Videocardz you'll see that he's sceptical about the source of this "leak", so let's take it with a healthy dose of salt until next week.

 

[Vayra86]

the 3600x and 3700x,what is the ccx configuration of those ? is it 1x8 on 3600x and 2x 6 on 3700x or 2x4/3x4 ?

Smelling that 5775C replacement?

 

[cucker tarlson]

Smelling that 5775C replacement?

sadly,I'll have to replace it some day.

 

[ShurikN]

Sure but the point is that for a 7nm chip 4.7 is not a lot. And GloFo's 14nm wasn't that great.

That's just one chip, others (it all these leaks are to be believed) boost to 4.8 and 5GHz.

 

[Hellfire]

The 3800x looks nice, and 4.7 is not slouch,

IF the 3800x is confirmed with these details next week it would put A LOT of credence to the rumours of the 3850x with a 5.1 ghz boost clock being correct.

I'm just happy as CES is on my birthday so hopefully AMD will be giving me a nice birthday present.

 

[R0H1T]

Your birthday spans 5 days

 

[Hellfire]

Your birthday spans 5 days

It was a hell of a long labour but no, it's on the 8th when it starts

 

[Metroid]

AMD CES is on 9th January around 9-10am, intel is done for and I'm glad about it, enough with the 4 cores cpus milkman show days, my next cpu will be that one with 12 cores 5 ghz or so to speak, 3770x.

 

[Tomgang]

The leaks before this said something simular, i took that with a gain of salt.

But now that a store has leaked spec that is so dam close to the ealy leaks, that this time i have a bit bigger trust that this is real in fact.

If those turbo clocks are real and the same with core count and the promised ipc gain gain is true about 25-30 % i have read. Also prices are spot on, amd this time around really has a cpu line up that can make intels ass really hurt.

I mean intels best defence for ryzen in my opinion else has been higher core clock and and a bit better ipc. But if all these spec are true, intels really need to up there ass or else amd might get most of the marked share for 2019. Intel is still on 14 nm fabrication for four years now and amd is already soon on 7 nm. I smelll trouble for intel in the near future, until they can go to a lower nm fabrication.

 

[eidairaman1]

AMD CES is on 9th January around 9-10am, intel is done for and I'm glad about it, enough with the 4 cores cpus milkman show days, my next cpu will be that one with 12 cores 5 ghz or so to speak, 3770x.

Be Realistic here dude.

 

[Hellfire]

The leaks before this said something simular, i took that with a gain of salt.

But now that a store has leaked spec that is so dam close to the ealy leaks, that this time i have a bit bigger trust that this is real in fact.

If those turbo clocks are real and the same with core count and the promised ipc gain gain is true about 25-30 % i have read. Also prices are spot on, amd this time around really has a cpu line up that can make intels ass really hurt.

I mean intels best defence for ryzen in my opinion else has been higher core clock and and a bit better ipc. But if all these spec are true, intels really need to up there ass or else amd might get most of the marked share for 2019. Intel is still on 14 nm fabrication for four year now and is already soon on 7 nm. I smelll trouble for intel in the near future, until they can go to a lower nm fabrication.

Agreed, Hell even a 15-20% increase in IPC will be more than enough to take the running spot in my opinion.

 

[SL2]

http://www.e-katalog.ru/m1_compare....85968,1485970,1485972,1485975,1485976,1485980

 

[Supercrit]

I thought my 2700X would suffice for the next 5 years I guess not. Thank you AMD for hurting my wallet more, I just can't resist if it ends up real.

 

[Deleted member 50521]

Done some reading. It is the Russian equal of PCPartPicker. I would take this with a metric ton of salt. Very likely some Russian dude came across AdoredTV and thought this is a good idea.


I wish AMD all the good luck for bringing competitive products. But hyping things out of proportion is bad for everyone

 

[phanbuey]

I thought my 2700X would suffice for the next 5 years I guess not. Thank you AMD for hurting my wallet more, I just can't resist if it ends up real.

This is the exact reason I went with Intel for the gaming rig....

Going the 1700 > 2700x > 3700x route would cost a ton and limit my ram options. If this is true then I can expect price drops on the 10 core x299 chips, if it isn't then the 7820x @ 5ghz will last me some time anyways. The AMD chip releases are amazing but it would send my upgrade itch into full meltdown mode. I'm bad enough as it is...

 

[theonek]

Well, games have to be learned to use all that cores. otherwise it will be slower in games even than 2700, like the last threadripers....

 

[Vario]

Will internal latency be an issue with the chiplet design?

 

[TheLostSwede]

Well, games have to be learned to use all that cores. otherwise it will be slower in games even than 2700, like the last threadripers....

Why? Threadripper had cache related issues, which will most likely not be a problem here. You got any solid facts here, or are you just throwing out FUD?

 

[SL2]

I wish AMD all the good luck for bringing competitive products. But hyping things out of proportion is bad for everyone

I think the specs looks realistic, even if the price speculations might not be.

The 3600X runs 300 MHz faster than the 2700X, that's less than a 10 % speed bump.

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

Done some reading. It is the Russian equal of PCPartPicker. I would take this with a metric ton of salt. Very likely some Russian dude came across AdoredTV and thought this is a good idea.


I wish AMD all the good luck for bringing competitive products. But hyping things out of proportion is bad for everyone

Amd aren't hyping anything until Ces ,the hype is based on rumours ,no more, I think they could be right but regardless are meaningless compared to reviews and benches

Well, games have to be learned to use all that cores. otherwise it will be slower in games even than 2700, like the last threadripers....

Nah more Ipc and higher single core clocks will benefit the legacy dx11 Api's and zen + added 15-17% ,not insubstantial in itself.

 

[phanbuey]

I think the specs looks realistic, even if the price speculations might not be.

The 3600X runs 300 MHz faster than the 2700X, that's less than a 10 % speed bump.

Isn't there a 10-15% IPC bump on top of that though? If so then it will be quite a bit faster.