• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

Did it again a retest fined tuned settings!
Desktop Screenshot 2020.02.10 - 10.21.53.57.png
 

Attachments

  • Desktop Screenshot 2020.02.10 - 10.22.30.76.png
    Desktop Screenshot 2020.02.10 - 10.22.30.76.png
    116.8 KB · Views: 244
  • Desktop Screenshot 2020.02.10 - 10.23.15.02.png
    Desktop Screenshot 2020.02.10 - 10.23.15.02.png
    109.8 KB · Views: 243
  • Desktop Screenshot 2020.02.10 - 10.34.23.96.png
    Desktop Screenshot 2020.02.10 - 10.34.23.96.png
    864.1 KB · Views: 236
Here's my 3900x going strong... this is just 24/7 with several windows open idle etc...
 

Attachments

  • 3900xcpuz.png
    3900xcpuz.png
    124.2 KB · Views: 474
Last edited:
just stock settings

cpuz benchmark.PNG
 
:D

Core i5 8600k @ 5.26 GHz




 
3900X PPT/EDC 90W/90A , single thread got a small boost, multicore was a little over 8400 before, so not much of a loss.
load temp went down ~10C

3900xECO.jpg
 
First pic - run from WinPE
Second pic - run from Win10
What's wrong with single thread test? Also results vary with Win10, from 360 to 420.
 

Attachments

  • 111.jpg
    111.jpg
    125.8 KB · Views: 244
cpu z.PNG


Stock xeon non overclockable chip (times two)... but at least it turbos to 3.5GHz... I've always wanted a CPUz screenshot like this ;)

uhwx2f.png


cpuz.PNG
 
Last edited:
Core i5 8600k @ 5.26 GHz




0.PNG
 
Not sure if this effects all CPU's but on my 3570k I ran the new 1,92 version and scored 472, 1872, which seemed low.
I ran older 1.90 and get 486, 1912. That pretty big change.
 
Here's 5 runs on 1.92:

Run 1: 456.9 3382.3
Run 2: 457.8 3373.1
Run 3: 459.8 3370.7
Run 4: 458.3 3361.7
Run 5: 458.5 3353.9
average: 458.26 3368.14

The consistent drop per run for me on multi-threaded score makes me fairly sure it's a heat related degradation.

Trying 5 runs on 1.90 now:

Run 1: 449 3340.7
Run 2: 462 3375.5
Run 3: 461.7 3369.5
Run 4: 461.3 3369.1
Run 5: 464.5 3369.1
Average: 459.7 3364.78

I'm not convinced there's much difference between versions. Just minor variation between runs.

Your runs varied by 14 single-core, 40 multi-core, mine varied by 15 single-core, 42 multi-core.
 
Last edited:
Here's 5 runs on 1.92:

Run 1: 456.9 3382.3
Run 2: 457.8 3373.1
Run 3: 459.8 3370.7
Run 4: 458.3 3361.7
Run 5: 458.5 3353.9
average: 458.26 3368.14

The consistent drop per run for me on multi-threaded score makes me fairly sure it's a heat related degradation.

Trying 5 runs on 1.90 now:

Run 1: 449 3340.7
Run 2: 462 3375.5
Run 3: 461.7 3369.5
Run 4: 461.3 3369.1
Run 5: 464.5 3369.1
Average: 459.7 3364.78

I'm not convinced there's much difference between versions. Just minor variation between runs.

Your runs varied by 14 single-core, 40 multi-core, mine varied by 15 single-core, 42 multi-core.
I ran it 3 more times, rebooting each time so same fresh start, I get the same avg results, always better with 1.90 than 1.92.
I run clocks at 4700mhz and I would get about the same results if I ran 1.90 at somewhere around 4500-4600mhz (closer to 4600).

PS: my temps are low, like 60-65c.
 
60-65 C doesn't actually strike me as particularly low for a benchmark that short, or one lacking a GPU-taxing component.

My CPU idles around 58 C, it reached 79 C during the benchmark. Still pretty cool for a laptop CPU. It's a i7-9750H that I was testing it on, so during really intensive benchmarks it's common for me to see temps that reach around 95 C.
 
It´s been a while since i last posted, as i whas planning to upgrade to at Ryzen 9 3950X setup. But thanks to Covid-19 and lock down i lost my job and by that my income. I had to put it on hold sadly. But luckely X58 is still going strong and works flawless even throw i have given my old I7 980X i good beating over the last 3 years i have had it. result are done with my every day settings. Seems like it pretty much match a stock AMD Ryzen 5 1600 that is a 3 year old CPU vs. my 10 year old CPU al throw overclock.
cpu-z.jpg
 
60-65 C doesn't actually strike me as particularly low for a benchmark that short, or one lacking a GPU-taxing component.

My CPU idles around 58 C, it reached 79 C during the benchmark. Still pretty cool for a laptop CPU. It's a i7-9750H that I was testing it on, so during really intensive benchmarks it's common for me to see temps that reach around 95 C.
That wasn't pertaining to CPU-Z only, as that BM is short I get like 60c, prime95 I get like 68-70 after mins of running. Either way, it's moot as I have never seen any throttling conditions with my chip, though I have not gone above 80c ever, AFAIK I would need to hit over 100c.
I will just use 1.90 so my old tests are still valid when I update to new CPU I just use the latest as it won't matter.
 
Here one of the old girl.
Capture.PNG


Vcore is a little high, that's normally what I use to run 4500mhz, but its what I needed to pass linpack xtreme.
 
Stock out of the box running XMP no other changes

Untitled.png
 
Back
Top