- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
- Messages
- 328 (0.47/day)
That doesn't make much sense. It's mostly a side-grade. Unless you're doing it just out of curiosity.
I am going to go for more cores and turn off hyper threading.
Plus I am curious.
That doesn't make much sense. It's mostly a side-grade. Unless you're doing it just out of curiosity.
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D -30 uv |
---|---|
Motherboard | AsRock Steel Legend B650 |
Cooling | MSI C360 AIO |
Memory | T-Create 32gb 6000 CL 30-36-36-36 |
Video Card(s) | MERC310 7900 XT -60 uv +150 core |
Display(s) | NZXT Canvas IPS 1440p 165hz 27" |
Case | NZXT H710 (Red/Black) |
Audio Device(s) | HD58X, Asgard 2, Modi 3 |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850W |
I have heard so many say e-cores are good and help in games yet I also read reports that they cause stuttering in some games like Star Citizen Elden Ring and even Cyberpunk??
Well I will give a pass for Star Citizen as it is a bad buggy beta game, but 2 year old Elden Ring and what Cyberpunk which is supposed to be good with them? That gives me pause as well?
Are the issues popping up just FUD and anti e-core propaganda ( I will admit my own fears and skepticism and preference for more P cores has had me biased against e-cores a lot but I am willing to give them a chance now) and easy work arounds or are they real?
And you you effectively use WIN10 with 12-14th Gen or is WIN11 actually required to not have those issues. Cause I hate WIN11 interface and hearing about the more embedded telemetry harder to turn off than on WIN10.
I would prefer more than 8 P cores on a single ring/CCD, but none exists, so have thought of getting a 14700K or 14900K/138900K and disabling HT and just using e-cores for extra threads and seeing how it goes. Will things work smoother in games than just a good 8 core 16 thread CPU with HT on from either intel or AMD Zen4 and Raptor Cove or newer for today's most threaded games and tomorrow's as well? Or not really?
Yes AMD has Zen 5 coming and supposedly better IPC, but still the dual CCD severe latency issues and Intel is much better in that regard even with e-cores it seems as thread director 2 likely works very well and all e-cores and P cores are on the same ring bus unlike AMD's extra P cores.
System Name | BigRed |
---|---|
Processor | I7 12700k |
Motherboard | Asus Rog Strix z690-A WiFi D4 |
Cooling | Noctua D15s/MX6 |
Memory | TEAM GROUP 32GB DDR4 4000C16 B die |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3080 Gaming Trio X 10GB |
Storage | M.2 drives-Crucial P5 500GB 4x4/WD SN850X 4TB 4x4/WD SN850X 2TB 4x4 |
Display(s) | Dell s3422dwg 34" 3440x1440p 144hz ultrawide |
Case | Corsair 7000D |
Audio Device(s) | Topping D10s DAC/PCamp TC 1680 AMP/MS M10 Speakers/Bowers and Wilkins P7 Headphones |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850x 80% gold |
Mouse | Logitech G604 wireless |
Keyboard | Logitech G413 carbon |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | Who cares |
System Name | Computer of Theseus |
---|---|
Processor | Intel i9-12900KS: 50x Pcore multi @ 1.18Vcore (target 1.275V -100mv offset) |
Motherboard | EVGA Z690 Classified |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S, 2xThermalRight TY-143, 4xNoctua NF-A12x25,3xNF-A12x15, 2xAquacomputer Splitty9Active |
Memory | G-Skill Trident Z5 (32GB) DDR5-6000 C36 F5-6000J3636F16GX2-TZ5RK |
Video Card(s) | EVGA Geforce 3060 XC Black Gaming 12GB |
Storage | 1x Samsung 970 Pro 512GB NVMe (OS), 2x Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB (data 1 and 2), ASUS BW-16D1HT |
Display(s) | Dell S3220DGF 32" 2560x1440 165Hz Primary, Dell P2017H 19.5" 1600x900 Secondary, Ergotron LX arms. |
Case | Lian Li O11 Air Mini |
Audio Device(s) | Audiotechnica ATR2100X-USB, El Gato Wave XLR Mic Preamp, ATH M50X Headphones, Behringer 302USB Mixer |
Power Supply | Super Flower Leadex Platinum SE 1000W 80+ Platinum White |
Mouse | Zowie EC3-C |
Keyboard | Vortex Multix 87 Winter TKL (Gateron G Pro Yellow) |
Software | Win 10 LTSC 21H2 |
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock X670E Taichi |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 Chromax |
Memory | 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4090 Trio |
Storage | Too much |
Display(s) | Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz |
Case | Thermaltake Core X9 |
Audio Device(s) | Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w |
Mouse | G305 |
Keyboard | Wooting HE60 |
VR HMD | Valve Index |
Software | Win 10 |
Basically everyone in this thread that has / uses Intel CPUS recommends leaving Ecores on for games, everyone that DOESNT have Intel recommends turning them off. I wonder who knows what they are talking about and who is spewing the usual hatred towards a specific company. Hmm, hard question
Hi,
Open box time to run away not buy lol
I am going to go for more cores and turn off hyper threading.
Plus I am curious.
In my experience with mine, E-cores or not, stability and ram compatability is the most compelling reasons to stick with or buy intel right now. No constant ageesa fixes, and with mine at least, granite stable. There was no X3D when i built it, and given the choice between AM4 with its xx years old boards or risk a new LGA setup, guess which i picked, glad i did. It is pointless and blinkered to not consider the other option when building new.
Roll on LGA1851/AM5 when i will consider the merits of both and switch or stick with Intel. Also i don not care and never have about power use, i can pay my bills and as long as i can keep the chip within it's temp limit, what does it matter.
Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
Case | Raijintek Thetis |
Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
This is all you need to know: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i7-14700k/20.htmlI am going to go for more cores and turn off hyper threading.
Plus I am curious.
System Name | Good enough |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge |
Motherboard | ASRock B650 Pro RS |
Cooling | 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30 |
Memory | 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora |
Storage | 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB |
Display(s) | LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV |
Case | Phanteks NV7 |
Power Supply | GPS-750C |
System Name | Teh Beast |
---|---|
Processor | Intel i9 14900K | 7800X3d |
Motherboard | Asus STRIX Z790E-E | Strix B650E-F |
Cooling | NZXT Kraken Elite 280 | Kraken Elite 280 |
Memory | 64GB G.Skill T5 6400Mhz | 32GB G.skill 6000mhz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire 7900XTX Pulse | 4070 Super |
Storage | 1X 1TB SN850X - 1 X 4TB SN850X - 2 X 2TB 980 Pro |
Display(s) | LG 38" 38GL950G + LG 27" 27GP83B-B |
Case | Lian Li o11 Air Mini |
Power Supply | Corsair RM1000x |
Software | WIndows 11 Pro |
System Name | BigRed |
---|---|
Processor | I7 12700k |
Motherboard | Asus Rog Strix z690-A WiFi D4 |
Cooling | Noctua D15s/MX6 |
Memory | TEAM GROUP 32GB DDR4 4000C16 B die |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3080 Gaming Trio X 10GB |
Storage | M.2 drives-Crucial P5 500GB 4x4/WD SN850X 4TB 4x4/WD SN850X 2TB 4x4 |
Display(s) | Dell s3422dwg 34" 3440x1440p 144hz ultrawide |
Case | Corsair 7000D |
Audio Device(s) | Topping D10s DAC/PCamp TC 1680 AMP/MS M10 Speakers/Bowers and Wilkins P7 Headphones |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850x 80% gold |
Mouse | Logitech G604 wireless |
Keyboard | Logitech G413 carbon |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | Who cares |
The funny thing is that all the scheduler does is avoid using e-cores for foreground task, that's about it. Games run "fine" with e-cores enabled because the scheduler is actively trying to minimize their use.
I am adamant they have no place in desktop PCs, they're only purpose is to give Intel some wins in multithreaded benchmarks, that's about it.
Absolutely disagree on this. AMD is a pain to do any memory related tweaking. I really enjoy having to reset CMOS when I put the tFAW to low lol.stability and compatibility has been good on Ryzen for awhile now. Recent AGESA updates even allow 7000 series CPUs to reach higher memory clocks than Intel, although it is pointless due to the higher latency. Ryzen is a better platform for RAM OC as well.
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock X670E Taichi |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 Chromax |
Memory | 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4090 Trio |
Storage | Too much |
Display(s) | Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz |
Case | Thermaltake Core X9 |
Audio Device(s) | Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w |
Mouse | G305 |
Keyboard | Wooting HE60 |
VR HMD | Valve Index |
Software | Win 10 |
What does it matter, a win is a win is it not, and MP is important to some people, so much that they would go with an intel with E-cores over a Ryzen without them.
Absolutely disagree on this. AMD is a pain to do any memory related tweaking.
The OP never stated that it would be a "win", just that they wanted to try it. I'm not really sure what the "win" part would be for a 14700K with HT disabled either. You are getting 13600K level MT performance at that point and 7600 level gaming performance for a price higher than a 7800X3D.
Ah the older stuff. Well AMD pretty much didnt have any memory tweaks until Ryzen and the first gen was quite bad in support for different types of RAM ICs. Never had a X99, but the Z87/Z97 ( 4th gen) stuff was great. So was Z490 (10th gen).Can't say I've had the same experience. Took my vastly less time to tune in my memory settings as compared to my 5820K. The X99 platform in general was terrible for memory overclocking. Not even 1st gen Ryzen was nearly as bad as that platform.
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock X670E Taichi |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 Chromax |
Memory | 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4090 Trio |
Storage | Too much |
Display(s) | Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz |
Case | Thermaltake Core X9 |
Audio Device(s) | Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w |
Mouse | G305 |
Keyboard | Wooting HE60 |
VR HMD | Valve Index |
Software | Win 10 |
HT are not real cores. If you have enough real cores its not needed
Games perform better with it off and e-cores on per benchmarks
Majority of games do anyways.
Intel is ditching HT with Arrow Lake.
Some have stated HT going away is to be celebrated.
Better latency with it off and not helpful nor needed when you have more than 8 cores on a single ring or CCD
Ah the older stuff. Well AMD pretty much didnt have any memory tweaks until Ryzen and the first gen was quite bad in support for different types of RAM ICs. Never had a X99, but the Z87/Z97 ( 4th gen) stuff was great. So was Z490 (10th gen).
Overall Intel slaps AMD year after year in memory.
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | 13900k |
Motherboard | MSI Unify X |
Cooling | Noctua U12A |
Memory | 7600c34 |
Video Card(s) | 4090 Gamerock oc |
Storage | 980 pro 2tb |
Display(s) | Samsung crg90 |
Case | Fractal Torent |
Audio Device(s) | Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack |
Power Supply | Be quiet dark power pro 1200 |
Mouse | Viper ultimate |
Keyboard | Blackwidow 65% |
Totally falseThe funny thing is that all the scheduler does is avoid using e-cores for foreground task, that's about it. Games run "fine" with e-cores enabled because the scheduler is actively trying to minimize their use.
I am adamant they have no place in desktop PCs, they're only purpose is to give Intel some wins in multithreaded benchmarks, that's about it.
Totally false too. You are not getting 13600k levels of MT. HT only exists in the 8pcores, disabling them drops performance by 10-15%. CBR23 is still going to be above 30k, making it still more than 50% faster than the x3d. 50%. With HT off. Enough said.The OP never stated that it would be a "win", just that they wanted to try it. I'm not really sure what the "win" part would be for a 14700K with HT disabled either. You are getting 13600K level MT performance at that point and 7600 level gaming performance for a price higher than a 7800X3D.
System Name | BigRed |
---|---|
Processor | I7 12700k |
Motherboard | Asus Rog Strix z690-A WiFi D4 |
Cooling | Noctua D15s/MX6 |
Memory | TEAM GROUP 32GB DDR4 4000C16 B die |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3080 Gaming Trio X 10GB |
Storage | M.2 drives-Crucial P5 500GB 4x4/WD SN850X 4TB 4x4/WD SN850X 2TB 4x4 |
Display(s) | Dell s3422dwg 34" 3440x1440p 144hz ultrawide |
Case | Corsair 7000D |
Audio Device(s) | Topping D10s DAC/PCamp TC 1680 AMP/MS M10 Speakers/Bowers and Wilkins P7 Headphones |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850x 80% gold |
Mouse | Logitech G604 wireless |
Keyboard | Logitech G413 carbon |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | Who cares |
The OP never stated that it would be a "win", just that they wanted to try it. I'm not really sure what the "win" part would be for a 14700K with HT disabled either. You are getting 13600K level MT performance at that point and 7600 level gaming performance for a price higher than a 7800X3D.
Can't say I've had the same experience. Took my vastly less time to tune in my memory settings as compared to my 5820K. The X99 platform in general was terrible for memory overclocking. Not even 1st gen Ryzen was nearly as bad as that platform.
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | 13900k |
Motherboard | MSI Unify X |
Cooling | Noctua U12A |
Memory | 7600c34 |
Video Card(s) | 4090 Gamerock oc |
Storage | 980 pro 2tb |
Display(s) | Samsung crg90 |
Case | Fractal Torent |
Audio Device(s) | Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack |
Power Supply | Be quiet dark power pro 1200 |
Mouse | Viper ultimate |
Keyboard | Blackwidow 65% |
It's not an assumption. When someone claims that games don't put any load on ecores (see post below) it's blatantly obvious theyve actually never, ever used a cpu with ecores, cause if they had theyd know that's absolutely wrong. Games constantly put load on ecores, in fact that's the whole point of them, to remove any load from the logical cores (HT).Character assassination nonsense based on nothing but an assumption. People can have systems outside of the one listed on their profile. It's pretty silly to assume anyone on a tech enthusiast form would only have a single system.
Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
Case | Raijintek Thetis |
Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
Right... Another AMD user that knows and is adamant about it. This forums is just full of useful and objective advice.The funny thing is that all the scheduler does is avoid using e-cores for foreground task, that's about it. Games run "fine" with e-cores enabled because the scheduler is actively trying to minimize their use.
I am adamant they have no place in desktop PCs, they're only purpose is to give Intel some wins in multithreaded benchmarks, that's about it.
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | 13900k |
Motherboard | MSI Unify X |
Cooling | Noctua U12A |
Memory | 7600c34 |
Video Card(s) | 4090 Gamerock oc |
Storage | 980 pro 2tb |
Display(s) | Samsung crg90 |
Case | Fractal Torent |
Audio Device(s) | Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack |
Power Supply | Be quiet dark power pro 1200 |
Mouse | Viper ultimate |
Keyboard | Blackwidow 65% |
I hate to quote user benchmark but man was he right when he was calling most of the internet "amd religious fanatics".Right... Another AMD user that knows and is adamant about it. This forums is just full of useful and objective advice.
System Name | Good enough |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge |
Motherboard | ASRock B650 Pro RS |
Cooling | 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30 |
Memory | 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora |
Storage | 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB |
Display(s) | LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV |
Case | Phanteks NV7 |
Power Supply | GPS-750C |
It matters because adding X amount of normal cores to reach a certain level of MT performance is not the same as adding an Y amount of e-cores to get to the same level of performance. An e-core has roughly half the performance of a normal core, whenever there is any process/thread where it's individual performance is important rather than the collective set of threads for that process (which is most of them) lands on an e-core it will run abnormally slow, no matter how good the scheduler can get it's impossible to not come short of a system that just has normal cores.What does it matter, a win is a win is it not, and MP is important to some people
Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
Case | Raijintek Thetis |
Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
Yes and if Achilles gives an advantage to the tortoise, he will never be able to catch it. It's all just a matter of logic, isn't it?It matters because adding X amount of normal cores to reach a certain level of MT performance is not the same as adding an Y amount of e-cores to get to the same level of performance. An e-core has roughly half the performance of a normal core, whenever there is any process/thread where it's individual performance is important rather than the collective set of threads for that process (which is most of them) lands on an e-core it will run abnormally slow, no matter how good the scheduler can get it's impossible to not come short of a system that just has normal cores.
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | 13900k |
Motherboard | MSI Unify X |
Cooling | Noctua U12A |
Memory | 7600c34 |
Video Card(s) | 4090 Gamerock oc |
Storage | 980 pro 2tb |
Display(s) | Samsung crg90 |
Case | Fractal Torent |
Audio Device(s) | Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack |
Power Supply | Be quiet dark power pro 1200 |
Mouse | Viper ultimate |
Keyboard | Blackwidow 65% |
Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
Case | Raijintek Thetis |
Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
I don't think the E-cores are faster than a Zen4 core. If you disable all P-cores and and try to go against the same number of Zen4 cores, Intel will lose badly. But the total processing power, with P and E cores pooled together, is indeed higher than whatever AMD can muster. This is proof that Intel was smart to go for perf/sq mm, even if E-cores aren't a win in every single scenario.The 14900k, the 13900ks and the 13900k is sitting at the top of the TPU application benchmark graph. All 3 of these CPUs are at the top, with the 7950x being number 4 (soon number 5, after 900ks launches) So even with the scheduler sending tasks to the ecores or whatever the guy above is claiming, the cpus with ecores are the fastest.
So the conclusion is that even ecores are faster than Zen 4 cores. I have no other explanation but I'm all ears.
Processor | Intel i5 8400 |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus Prime H370M-Plus/CSM |
Cooling | Scythe Big Shuriken & Noctua NF-A15 HS-PWM chromax.black.swap |
Memory | 8GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2400 |
Video Card(s) | ROG-STRIX-GTX1060-O6G-GAMING |
Storage | 1TB 980 Pro |
Display(s) | Samsung UN55KU6300F |
Case | Cooler Master MasterCase Pro 3 |
Power Supply | Super Flower Leadex III 750w |
Software | W11 Pro |
Some have stated HT going away is to be celebrated.
The 14900k, the 13900ks and the 13900k is sitting at the top of the TPU application benchmark graph. All 3 of these CPUs are at the top, with the 7950x being number 4 (soon number 5, after 900ks launches) So even with the scheduler sending tasks to the ecores or whatever the guy above is claiming, the cpus with ecores are the fastest.
So the conclusion is that even ecores are faster than Zen 4 cores. I have no other explanation but I'm all ears.
Admittedly someone with Zero experience modern P/E core. Who also stated future unrealized implementation would be the most important decider if it going away should be celebrated.
More of a reactive statement on my part than one that should taken as directly relevant to gaming. Quite a large range of programs were developed in direct conflict with HT.