• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TSMC Faces $1 Billion Fine from US Government Over Shipments to Huawei

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
3,267 (1.12/day)
TSMC is confronting a potential $1 billion-plus penalty from the US Commerce Department after inadvertently fabricating compute chiplets later integrated into Huawei's Ascend 910 AI processor. The fine, potentially reaching twice the value of unauthorized shipments, reflects the scale of components that circumvented export controls limiting Chinese access to advanced semiconductor technology. The regulatory breach originated in late 2023 when TSMC processed orders from Sophgo, a design partner of crypto-mining firm Bitmain. These chiplets, which are manufactured on advanced process nodes and contain tens of billions of transistors, were identified in TechInsights teardown analysis of Huawei Ascend 910 AI accelerator, revealing a supply chain vulnerability where TSMC lacked visibility into the components' end-use.

Upon discovery of the diversion, TSMC immediately halted Sophgo shipments and engaged in discussions with Commerce Department officials. By January, Sophgo had been added to the Entity List, limiting its access to US semiconductor technology. A Center for Strategic and International Studies report revealed that Huawei obtained approximately two million Ascend 910B logic dies through shell companies that misled TSMC. Huawei's preference for TSMC-made dies was due to manufacturing challenges in domestic chip production. This incident has forced TSMC to strengthen its customer vetting protocols, including terminating its relationship with Singapore-based PowerAIR following internal compliance reviews. The enforcement process typically begins with a proposed charging letter detailing violations and penalty calculations, followed by a 30-day response period. As Washington tightens restrictions on AI processor exports to Chinese entities, semiconductor manufacturers are under increased pressure to implement rigorous controls throughout multinational supply chains.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
1000005025.gif
 
Whoopsie! Anyway I thought they got 6.6 billion dollar subsidy under the chips act so a prospective 1 billion dollar fine is a non-issue.
 
I'm all for regulations and fining those who break them, but this is one has about the same logical validity as extortion rackets fines are often accused of being...

If y'all want to weasel out of that CHIPS money, just do it. It's not as if you're that into honouring old agreements these days...

What about Nvidia, huh?
Jensen is keeping Elon happy.
 
What about Nvidia, huh?

nvidia "complies" with trade regulations :D


 
No "good" deed left goes unpunished.

TSMC reports that huawei circumvented trade restrictions and what do they get in return? a fucking billion dollar fine.

Seems hardly a day goes by that the US isn't threatening Taiwan now, they might decide to join China voluntarily at this rate.
 
Seems hardly a day goes by that the US isn't threatening Taiwan now, they might decide to join China voluntarily at this rate.

Yeah, at this point when there were several clear statements that USA won't help if China decides to invade, with all the tariffs and penalties... Imagine the surprised Pikachu face when the complete Western World finds out we don't have the access to best and biggest semiconductor manufacturer any more...
 
Another brain dead decision from the US.
 
Another brain dead decision from the US.
What decision? The article says "potential $1 billion-plus penalty" so isn't this just speculation at this point?
 
Wait, TSMC is a Taiwanese company. What do you mean US fines?? When did the US make the law in Taiwan??
Is not like the TSMC fabs in US exported to China in order to receive the fines.
 
What decision? The article says "potential $1 billion-plus penalty" so isn't this just speculation at this point?

potential brain dead decision. is this better for you?

What are we doing here if not commenting the news. I guess you're not upset at my comment but at TPU for posting speculation. Is that it?
 
Wait, TSMC is a Taiwanese company. What do you mean US fines?? When did the US make the law in Taiwan??
Is not like the TSMC fabs in US exported to China in order to receive the fines.

USA likes to have it both ways - to still act as a world's policeman, but at the same time the won't honour any of their agreements and partnerships any more.

At this point it wouldn't surprise me if they would order precision strikes on TSMC,ASML, other "threats" to US glory, to leapfrog their way to no. 1 in semiconductor manufacturing. After all, allies are now worse than enemies, right?

Good luck to all tech sites to separate debates about tech and political ones - when nearly all that affects the sector are political decisions.
 
potential brain dead decision. is this better for you?
Yes that better reflects the state of reality. No need to get worked up about something that didn't actually happen.
What are we doing here if not commenting the news. I guess you're not upset at my comment but at TPU for posting speculation. Is that it?
I'm not upset at anything but there is a difference between what can potentially happen and what has not happened.
 
USA likes to have it both ways - to still act as a world's policeman, but at the same time the won't honour any of their agreements and partnerships any more.
On the other hand the world likes to have it both ways too. They want the USA to be the policeman because nobody likes the policeman or wants to take the heat from being their own policeman in their own jurisdiction. It's much easier to contract out the blame when the criticism starts flying.
At this point it wouldn't surprise me if they would order precision strikes on TSMC,ASML, other "threats" to US glory, to leapfrog their way to no. 1 in semiconductor manufacturing. After all, allies are now worse than enemies, right?
That's kind of outlandish like injecting bleach or nuking a hurricane.
Good luck to all tech sites to separate debates about tech and political ones - when nearly all that affects the sector are political decisions.
But it's always been this way. Trade has always been effected by politics throughout history. The question is can one talk about the subject without going off topic politically? It's a difficult thing to do apparently by the recent number of locked threads.

I think it's fair to question How does the US Commerce Department decide and enforce fees of this nature? How are jurisdiction issues decided and handled? If anyone can actually answer those questions without going off topic about orange man we might all learn something about policy making (good and bad) and how these things are negotiated in global commerce before the thread gets locked. I'm just trying to be constructive and on topic.
 
Last edited:
I didn't know the CHIPS ACT funding could get a discount
 
That's quite a large fine.
 
I think it's fair to question How does the US Commerce Department decide and enforce fees of this nature? How are jurisdiction issues decided and handled? If anyone can actually answer those questions without going off topic about orange man we might all learn something about policy making (good and bad) and how these things are negotiated in global commerce before the thread gets locked. I'm just trying to be constructive and on topic.
You can't have these types of productive conversations because one man has the ultimate say and no formal process or policymaking apparatus can stand in the way of his whims. It really does come down to what one man wants or doesn't want.
 
Last edited:
You can't have these types of productive conversations because said one man ...
He's not here stopping anyone here from discussion so that's a bunch of nonsense. I guess you missed my point.
 
Man watching the current global politics is more fun than PC gaming :roll:.

download.jpg
 
Pocket change for them, besides they are "bribing" investing that money into US now.
 
Back
Top