• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT Pulse OC 16 GB

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
28,986 (3.74/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
The Sapphire Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB sells close to MSRP, yet it features a factory overclock and higher power limit. In our testing, its cooler remained whisper-quiet even at full load. Interestingly, this model uses Samsung memory, whereas all other cards we've tested so far use Hynix.

Show full review
 
What the hell happened with the VSync power results? That's got to be a card BIOS or reporting error.

Edit: has to be a reporting error as the voltage at VSync is a normal and expected 0.725 V. There's no way to use 180W in-game at 0.725V with only 2048 cores.
 
Looks like an OG Sapphire 580 Pulse.

Why are the clocks lower under OC than regular gaming clocks (3003Mhz Vs 3196Mhz)
 
Looks like the samsung memory is a decent overclocker according to the max clocks achieved.
 
What the hell happened with the VSync power results? That's got to be a card BIOS or reporting error.

Edit: has to be a reporting error as the voltage at VSync is a normal and expected 0.725 V. There's no way to use 180W in-game at 0.725V with only 2048 cores.
Fixed. I noticed and retested, but didn't upload properly. Underlying reason is that V-Sync wasn't enabled in the 1st test run

Why are the clocks lower under OC than regular gaming clocks (3003Mhz Vs 3196Mhz)
Different workloads scale differently. The clock in GT1 at default was 2830 MHz
 
Fixed. I noticed and retested, but didn't upload properly. Underlying reason is that V-Sync wasn't enabled in the 1st test run


Different workloads scale differently. The clock in GT1 at default was 2830 MHz
Probably also not helped by the lower "max power limit" being capped at 187w Vs 200w for most other models? obviously Sapphire want to save that power limit and headroom for the Nitro+ with the Pulse being the more "budget" model between both
 
Did I just not look at the right reviews, or do none of the 5060/Ti or 9060 XT reviews have GPU compute sections? It would be nice to get AI, Blender, etc comparisons.
 
Good to see W1zz finally testing a RX 90X0 card with Samsung VRAM, I've certainly noticed the lower temperatures reported on my card compared to those with Hynix.
 
Briefly> RX 9060XT ~29700M Transistors but 5% slower as RTX 5060Ti ~21900M (73%) :rolleyes:

Yet the 9060 is 199 sqmm with the 5060 Ti at 181 sqmm, 91% the size, not 73%. Both stats being identically irrelevant.

What's actually relevant is price for FPS and features.
 
Thx, W1zzard! I am a proud user of the Metal-coloured version of this model. Before buying I compared info on Sapphire official websites and believed 16 GB version Pulse and Nitro share the same PCB design. And 240 mm dual fan design makes it the perfect choice for me. And mine's got Samsung VRAM and it runs so cool!
Now I just hope the graphics driver could become really stable very soon. Damn, how annoying that AMD screwed driver up again and again...
IMG_20250606_130419.jpg
 
Past (and current 9070/9070XT) Pulse cards typically used ball bearing fans. They had em for the RX6600/6600XT, RX5600XT, and RX570. It's a shame Sapphire decided to go with sleeve bearings this time around for this model.

1750495172249.png
 
Really a nice card. Thanks for the review.
 
Thanks for a thorough review! And big thanks for taking into account the actual PCI slot accessibility, and an emphasis on the details. That's a minor, but crucial info.
This is just pitty, that the card is not precise 2 slot, while it easilly could be. And this is exactly the place I would put an expansion card. Would be an ideal "little" (low end) card, otherwise.
Also, the lack of fourth connector, is also a big dissapointment. Espcecially, that each previous gen had all the four, and mostly parity of DP/HDMI, or even three DP/one HDMI.

But nevertheless, power consumption and efficiency, performance and the "compact" size is all there. Judging by the tºC, the VRAM cooling is seems to be vastly superior/best among rivals. Regardless, if this is a Samsung chips feature, or the cooler itself, this is still a key thing, as GPU can be cooled much easilly, with just turniging RPM a bit higher. While VRAM cooling design flaws are here to stay.
There's even naught RGBloat makeweight garbage. Only the price is completely bonkers. No way I would put $500 (the exact price here) into an entry level card.
Heck, this is almost what AMD was boasting about to be a price of 9070XT, and how accessible RDNA4 would be. Lies! AMD and it's partnersd just milking the market, while nVidia and Intel can't get their sh*t together. This is exaclty the same thing, that happened during Zen3 launch, with 5600X almost reaching $400 in retail, while dumping millions of units of stock.
 
Last edited:
Thx, W1zzard! I am a proud user of the Metal-coloured version of this model. Before buying I compared info on Sapphire official websites and believed 16 GB version Pulse and Nitro share the same PCB design. And 240 mm dual fan design makes it the perfect choice for me. And mine's got Samsung VRAM and it runs so cool!
Now I just hope the graphics driver could become really stable very soon. Damn, how annoying that AMD screwed driver up again and again...View attachment 404636
What is not working? Zero issues for me with amd drivers.
 
Bought one one week ago and I have mixed feelings. Now I'm ready to comfortably play Witcher 3 and Metro Exodus on my 4K screen and that's nice. But it's ~46% over RX 7600 for ~66% more money and that's absolutely not nice. The only advantage over 7700 XT is lower power consumption, so I don't have to swap my PSU too and it dosn't run hot in my not-so-big Chieftec Visio Air case. Oh yes, and name that match better with mine Ryzen 5 9600X, yeah :rolleyes: But was it worth waiting? I'm not sure.
Are all sapphire pulse rx 9060 xt cards using Samsung memory?
Nope, not all of them. Mine has Hynix memory.
 

Attachments

  • 9060XT16GB.gif
    9060XT16GB.gif
    26.2 KB · Views: 233
What is not working? Zero issues for me with amd drivers.
From what I'm seeing, Radeon Settings: Host Service is causing all the stuttering, almost totally ramdomly. I can't figure out why. When it happens, the whole system stutters very much, games and Windows OS itself, running at 15 fps, with huge lag. GPU only runs at 300 MHz or so, barely moving, so it must've been a driver problem. Anti-Lag doesn't work, nor does Relive.
I hereby strongly advise AMD to simplify their driver, or make the functions optional. I don't need all those things which make it unstable. Can anyone here in TPU tell AMD about this please?
 
Looks like hotspot temperature is real GPU temp. Is it even possible to make lightweight 650 g. card cold and quiet while power consumption is over 180 W. It's about all Radeon RX 9000.
 
Briefly> RX 9060XT ~29700M Transistors but 5% slower as RTX 5060Ti ~21900M (73%) :rolleyes:

Since you're ignoring gpu architecture, the 5060ti has more than double the cores of the 9060 XT
 
Since you're ignoring gpu architecture, the 5060ti has more than double the cores of the 9060 XT

RX 9060 XT is considerably faster, if it doesn't look faster is because Nvidia cheats with the image quality and has DLSS working at "native" settings.

1750615053961.png


1750615068157.png



I don't know why AMD participates in this circus, but doesn't file a class-action law-suit against Nvidia and its shenanigans.
 
Someone doesn’t know the definition of the word “theoretical”.
 
Mostly opened the review out of curiosity about the Samsung memory and it's lower temps. But the real (and nice) surprise are the overall low temperatures, comparable to the nitro model. Better than expected :cool: for a pulse model, maybe the VRAM contributes to this(?).
 
Back
Top