Recent content by Armagg3don

I don't understand what the surprise is since the 5.5 to 6 Gbps NVMe was already announced months ago for the end of this year. Maybe with the pandemic they'll be delayed, though.

Maybe, but then it's too soon to talk about not supporting SLI in DX12 for this game because it' s only a few days since it was released.

You are wrong, SLI support depends on the developer and not on the API (in this case DX12). There are DX12 games that do support SLI, like GoW4 and RoTTR, and I must say that the support is quite good.

But the architecture is the same (x86-x64) so there is no magic here, just "optimizations" that are nothing more than visual degradations to make people believe that xbox one x runs to "4k". In any case, even if the cpu was not a bottleneck, don't forget the igpu, which is also not something to...

As a matter of frequency, the xbox one x's iGPU is closer to a 470 than a 480. In addition, the console carries a literally toy CPU. What do you think that gives for a quality native 4K? Please, let's be serious.

It is undeniable that the xbox one x has a very austere hardware and low level, so it can not run a real 4K native of quality. And that running at 20-30fps seems to me a little more than embarrassing experience.

Same situation here.

So does it feel good to lose 20-40fps? It is not fanboyism, it is to stand in reality. Or maybe you think someone who has a 1080 or 1080ti just wants to get a portion of their performance ?? I think the fanboy here is you.

It is a fact that for someone who has a 1080Ti, it is primordial an Intel to get the most out of it. With that or any Ryzen is being wasted, and I do not say it, they say the real tests:

And murderers.

They are cold and blunt those numbers, but are the result of false promises that can not meet expectations. AMD can not live life smoke.

For that situation it is that I said this: "I refer not only to the stress caused by synthetic tests, but also for highly demanding games like Crysis 3." Metro Last Light is far from representing more stress scenario for a graphics card. You can check the cap that I put up.

Sorry but the 390 can achieve peak consumption much higher than 253w. I refer not only to the stress caused by synthetic tests, but also for highly demanding games like Crysis 3. It is in these situations where peak power of 390 (as well as other GCN) is triggered. Why do you think that...

"A bit more efficient"?? I'll leave this here: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-amd-radeon-r9-390-8gb-review

GTX970 all the way. OC, less power ungry, more efficient architecture. The 8GB of rebrand 390 are just marketing because before the card can use that amount of memory, the GPU would drown.