Recent content by E.S

Aren't all the SSDs with problems (870evo 970 980) 128-layer? 870qvo is 96-layer, but there were no problems. Is it possible that the firmware for 128-layer was not created properly?

I discovered something interesting. The SSD on this review site is the same serial as SPDIF's SSD. how could that happen? Did SPDIF plagiarize images from this site? https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/sata-3/samsung-870-evo-sata3-ssd-review-1-4tb-are-notebook-ssds-still-a-thing-u-bet/2/...

Is that SSD really manufactured in 2023? For SSDs manufactured in 2023, the 8th digit of the serial number is "W". Your SSD is "N". ・・・According to research, "N" is manufactured in 2020. The manufacturing date of that SSD is "10/2020".

Samsung says that the cause of the 870evo problem is the firmware. Someone posted about it on this forum. No one said that bad nand was the cause.

they change the subject. why? They hate this post. So they change the subject. are they getting paid?

The health status of Samsung ssd is shown truncated. Whenever Wear Leveling Count around 20 times increase, in 870evo, 1% of health condition decreases. Since your Wear Leveling Count is 1,your actual health status is 99.95%.

Imalti's 870evo has no problems. Besides, he talked about the unrelated 850evo many times. It seems that the purpose is to make important posts difficult to read with meaningless posts. is he getting paid?

You could have guessed that it wasn't correct and that it was probably just a display issue. You have been using PCs for a long time and are familiar with hardware.

There have been a lot of irrelevant posts on this forum lately. I suspect that you want to hijack the important topic with an unrelated topic. are they getting paid?

250GB has a very low error rate. Does it have something to do with NAND density?

https://github.com/linuxhw/SMART/tree/master/SSD/Samsung This page collects many S.M.A.R.T data. Days - avg. days per sample, Err - avg. errors per sample, MTBF - avg. MTBF in years per sample. MFG Model Size Samples Days Err MTBF Samsung SSD 870 EVO 250 GB 90 58 1 0.15 Samsung SSD 870...

My concern is that the 990 story will hijack the 870evo story and forget about the 870evo issue.

The data retention lifetime of NAND is shortened at high temperature. If the 870evo were also subjected to the same aging test on a heating table, wouldn't it be possible to quickly reproduce the issue?

Why 870evo only new hardware revision? What about 980? I think the cause of both problems is probably the same. Both 870evo and 980 have the same 128 layers. The 870qvo has 96 layers and there was no problem.