Recent content by mahirzukic2

Guess not, everyone is running away from that garbage.

Why didn't you RMA it? Or return to the shop you bought it from? I had the exact same issue with 2 RAM sticks from another company and after discovering issues with it (in the first 2-3 days of buying it and assembling the new PC) I promptly returned it for a refund. Also bought another RAM kit...

I am very sure that they will though. :laugh:

Nothing as good as good ole competition.

Driving stock up 100% in 3 years in no underperformance in no one's book, especially the board members' book, otherwise they would have fired her by now as you kindly pointed out.

I am running some financial simulations for days on end for the last 10 months. Just today I had to disable some cores and not run 32 threads but rather only 22, due to memory. And I have 64 GB of RAM. So if I had 96 GB I would be able to run using all threads on my 13900k processor.

This review right here proves what we were saying long before it happened. Not like it is any surprise though.

Apparently the company is a German one based in Braunschweig near Hanover. It could be worth a look. It just jumped 10% in price to 220 euros. :( It will keep getting worse unfortunately.

Hey @W1zzard, could you review the 'Innovation IT PerformanceY GEN4 4TB' drive available here? I would like to see its performance given it is still cheap ~200 euros. It might be a new performance king until it too rises in price.

Oh my, I was just about to comment on the guy above how this is equal(ish) to Galahad 2 while costing almost half of it. Only for you to point us in the right direction. This even cheaper variant of the same cooler is even cheaper, about 40% of the Galahad 2's price (when converted to USD) with...

I would suspect that 14900 non-k would have a similar v-f (voltage-frequency) curve like 14900k just pulled downwards a little bit, meaning lower clocks for the same voltage, or higher voltage for the same frequency due to being worse bins than K bins. That might translate into 22 - 25% lost...

I don't think you are crazy. He said that I (we) are missing the context. We are not though. It has low base clock of 2Ghz at a low wattage of 65w, and a pretty high PL2 wattage of 220w at 5.8 Ghz. How high of a sustained all-core clock can be had at 220w is not yet known, but it is certainly...

If I'd have to take a guess, I would bet my money on the latter.

You think it's 225w for 6 GHz all core? :eek: Not a chance, more like 450w. That's probably for single or lightly-threaded app, 1 to 2 threads. The T and non K bins are worse than K bins, so its power draw would be even worse than that in 14900k.

I was thinking the same. They were not known for the PC Storage which is more directed to HDDs and SSDs, but specifically CD/DVDs and the related tech.