Recent content by maximoor

It's ridiculous... just like the 4070 ti Super. Why on earth doesn't Nvidia simply reduce the price of the original versions? So far, only the 4070 Super has shown any noteworthy gains. Good times when the super suffix really made a difference, like on the RTX2060 / 2070.

In fact, I think the best bang-for-buck is the RX5700 XT for 150$ or the 1080 Ti for 170$. The 5700 XT is faster than the 6600 and at higher resolutions it's even close to the 6600XT because it has more bandwidth (256 Bit vs 128). The ARC580 is equivalent to or slower than the 6600 for 10$ more...

I would go for a RX6600 (~220$), it's perfect for that CPU for 1080p and a new 500W PSU. You wouldn't even spend 300$

Great review! Very interesting. Was an excelent idea for an early look at 7800X3D!

Works with its full x16 lanes, has more vram, more cache, more shader units, more TMUs, more rt units, it performes slightly better and it's cheaper than the RX 6650XT!! Hey, is less power hungry too by a good margin! here in Portugal, costs 389€, the 6600XT costs 369€ and cheapest 6650XT costs...

what's the point of this?

R5 2600 @ 3.9 Undervolted to 1.23v & 2x8 RipjawsV 3200 Cl16

Another bench results from @Techspot @Techspot full Review: http://www.techspot.com/review/1345-amd-ryzen-7-1800x-1700x/

What? :confused: Do you even read what i wrote? I'm referring to GTX 980 ... :toast:

Faster than 2x 980 SLI? Becouse this beast actually doubles the performance of the previous generation in 4K. Almost 100% faster... Nice job Nvidia (and Zotac!).

yeah.. I remember that. I still have an MSI 7850 Power Edition OCed to 1290 mhz (on my extreme profile) with "only" 1.250v. Remember.. Stock card is 860Mhz, so that's a 430 mhz improvement over reference or, in other words, an woopi 50% overclock! In some benchs/games, like BF3 or Metro LL, i...

Yeah, me too! That's it! It's in fact a 212 Evo with a better fan and much more expensive. I have my 212 Evo since 2012 in push-pull. The original CM fan is in "Pull" side and at the front side, i put a cheap (but much better) 5,00€ white arctic F12. The cooler costs me 29€, so... 34€ with two...

completely agree with you. ..and the fact that nVidia comparing 1070 to Titan X instead 980 Ti is becouse Titan X is indeed the fastest card.

What I see in this chart is that the 980 Ti has only 79% of the performance of GB 980 Ti WF .. which translates into +~26.6% boost for GB card relatively to 980 Ti reference. Or am I wrong?

So, same price as R9 Fury X, Same specs of R9 Fury X, but performance below R9 Fury??? WTF AMD? No thanks...