Recent content by mpc755

I'm not watching a 43 minute video simply because you posted it. Is there a couple of minutes I should watch?

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE' http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf “When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and...

'Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics John W.M. Bush' http://math.mit.edu/~bush/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Bush-ARFM-2015.pdf "Finally, as concerns my alignment vis-a-vis quantum interpretations, I remain steadfastly agnostic; however, if forced to choose, I would be inclined to back, by virtue...

An analogy would be a boat and its bow wave. In a boat double slit experiment the boat travels through a single slit and the bow wave passes through both. If the bow wave were far enough in front of the boat it would exit both slits prior to the boat exiting a single slit. As the bow wave exited...

Which doesn't refute weak measurement. In the following article the aether has mass and is what waves in a double slit experiment. 'From the Newton's laws to motions of the fluid and superfluid vacuum: vortex tubes, rings, and others' http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3900

When you have evidence which refutes the Steinberg experiments, which are the ones I am referring to, then post it.

Steinberg and his group is in Canada.

Point to an article which says they used biased data. And the article you referred to has nothing to do with the Steinberg experiments.

No one said anything about aether drag. In the following video what is referred to as frame dragging is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as honey in the following article is the aether. What is referred to as the swirl in the honey is the state of displacement of...

What you see in the following image is the state of displacement of the aether. What you see in the following image is deformed spacetime. The caption in the image is incorrect.

This is my understanding of entanglement and downconverted photon pairs. It is not the mainstream physics understanding.

No, if you reverse the spin of one it does not reverse the spin of the other. They are not physically or superluminally connected. Due to conservation of momentum they are created with opposite polarizations. They are propagating as exact opposites. The mathematics of quantum mechanics applies...

Nothing is transmitted. Due to conservation of momentum they are created with opposite angular momemtums. This "knowledge" does not have to be transmitted. It is already known by each of the pair. Each of the pair know their state so they know the state of each other. The pair are not...

The spin corresponds due to conservation of momentum.

'The pilot-wave dynamics of walking droplets' At the 2:00 minute mark it discusses walking droplets as an exposed variable theory. I think the whole notion of non-locality and hidden variables is a red herring. In order for there to be conservation of momentum, downconverted photon pairs are...