Recent content by Pewzor

It will be ironic since Intel roughly takes double the power for the same performance to Zen 2... The extra power cost the AC in room kicking up more often is a sustained extra cost of ownership to use an Intel rig. Intel is far from best value especially when they still need a Z board to do...

Oh for sure. Intel stuff is like apple stuff people will buy regardless how bad performance and value they might be. I totally agree. Ryzen really screwed up Intel's plan to milk the crap out of isheep using those quad cores.

This is funny because 9700k gives up 50% of the multicore performance to 3700x for 5% gaming using low settings with 2080ti. Requires an OC and double the power draw all for the extremely slight gaming fps advantage that anyone using a GPU less than RTX 2080 wouldnt notice. This is the very...

The deadline for the guesses are December, it's not hard to guess that something will come out during CES at least the "official" cinebench scores from AMD. As for people saying Computex for the tease which is in June, people would've forgot about this "guess the cinebench" event already since...

Not really but easily triggered fanboys are the funniest to piss off especially when they are stupid enough to not able to see outside Intel's little box and unable to take facts that damages their Intel or lack thereof ness.

It got auto corrected. It's "already" unlocked. But yes just like I said you can either get fked and get an Intel HEDT or buy any non-APU Ryzens. For special snowflakes that wants a Ryzen-like Intel processor can feel free to shell out more for Intel HEDT, Intel shareholders will love you long...

Well you could've have just got a Ryzen which is auto unlocked, supports ecc and without a widely unused iGPU, but yea for the specials that has to be an Intel then yes they are right in telling you to go buy a Intel's lulHEDT. Intel could barely keep 9900k from melting thru the socket, so...

Just saying how stupid your comment was, and made me laugh very hard, thanks, and B-Real. Thanks for the GTX 970 and Vega 56 number, weird how it's barely faster than 1060 3gig in 1080p but in 1440p its significantly faster than 1060. Good to see Vega 56 trading blows with RTX 2070 in 1440p...

This is the only account I have for TPU, I am just pointing out the poster I replied to made some comments that made me laugh. And I would love him to B-Real.

This made me laugh. GTX 1080 struggles against Vega 64 in well made games that's not sponsored by Nvidia like Wolfenstein and in many cutting edge API games that properly utilize Vulkan and DX12. GTX 1080 does not support FreeSync, fans are screwed out of $200 to 300 extra for the same thing...

Yea that 2.5fps from the 1060... people on /r/Nvidia were swearing 3gb is all you need for 1080p gaming because nvidia has great memory compression and some other bs... so Nvidia's 3gb is better than AMD's 6GB ect... it can't even handle a 4gb RX570... guess those nvidia guys trolled me good...

Doh Intel did it to show that for 70% to 100% more you can get 50% more than Ryzen. Intel doesn't like the truthful review that reads double the money 100% more for 4% more in 1440p or 10% more in 1080p than 2700x. It's simple get it? Intel wants a fake review they can fake their terribad...

While Lyle trying to blow the dust off the running 2700x bench using a heat gun during benchmarking session. You mean Raja who said it... and you know how that turned out? Intel hired Raja with offer he can't refuse. Says a lot about Intel eh. Raja probably botched Vega because Intel told him...

Why don't you just play in DX11? I mean it's not news that nVidia isn;t very good in next gen API. I would only play games in DX12 using nVidia if it's a GameWorks or nVidia paid games like Tomb Raider and shit, that's the only time nVidia crap works well on dx12.

The game engine simply reserves more vram if they are available but don't really use them unless necessary.