Recent content by Silent_Scone

I do not think it was the stance being taken to begin with. The service agent got this completely wrong.

The article is unfounded and should be updated.

Ok, it still doesn’t explain why precharge cannot be tBL-1 in both scenarios I knew you’d dodge me if I asked directly, so yes, I created an alternative account. But, in no way is any of this childish. The questions are valid, 1usmus. These are valid ones that bring the formula into question...

Yes, but this does not explain why PRECHARGE has to be sent at a minimum of CL-1 in this scenario, why not simply tBL-1, which is always 7. If this is not allowed here, why is it allowed in tRAS min? 1) Why do most white papers include tCAS in tRAS min, and it’s outside the tBL time window...

Great, while you’re at it please add why PRECHARGE needs to wait tCAS-1, when tras min can be only tRCD+(bl-1), otherwise you risk confusing people trying to understand relationships. Your article is way too short there. You can also explain why tWR should be considered within a read tRC cycle...

@1usmus @W1zzard Wait, just spotted this in the article: If tCL does not affect tRAS, why is the delay before PRECHARGE defined by the variable x=(tCL-1)? Otherwise, you would just write the delay before PRECHARGE is bl-1 or, simply 7. Somehow that doesn’t sound right to me. If CAS isn’t...

Hmm, this is a good article. Leaves me with a few questions I’ve always wanted to be answered, and I think I’ve finally found someone that can answer them! 1) Can you please explain the role of CAS in this tRAS timing table? 2) Isn’t tWR for recovery after write transactions? How does this...

AFAIK, the photo feature was requested by users that participate in the ROG GPU Tweak beta programme, for streaming or capturing screenies. 1) I don't know who decided on the stock image, but it is just a static picture, not a live banner or real-time advert. 2) The overlay isn't active by...

It's bought, not brought. At £2,500 at the least I doubt the last part of your post will be right, either.

Better to check if the information is valid before posting, shows that you're speaking vicariously rather than experiencing these things for yourself. I've not had the issue he has been speaking of.

Following up from a thread that was posted by another member, that got met with criticism due to naming terminology of all things(very mature from a moderator in all honesty). I'm posting it on his behalf for the benefit of others, this time without the unnecessary knit picking and insults from...